Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Commercial Real Estate Losses Could Hit $300 Billion: TARP Panel(could topple 3000 banks)
DSNews ^ | 02/12/10 | Carrie Bay

Posted on 02/14/2010 3:51:58 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Commercial Real Estate Losses Could Hit $300 Billion: TARP Panel

02/12/2010 By: Carrie Bay

Losses from defaults on commercial real estate loans maturing in the next few years could go as high as $300 billion, threatening to topple nearly 3,000 community banks nationwide, a federal watchdog group has concluded.

Market analysis by the Congressional Oversight Panel (COP), charged with keeping tabs on the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), shows that $1.4 trillion in loans made over the last decade for retail properties, office space, industrial facilities, hotels, and apartments will reach the end of their terms and require refinancing between 2011 and 2014.

According to the panel, the loans most likely to fail are those made at the height of the real estate bubble, when it seemed property values could go nowhere but up. Since that time, commercial property values have fallen more than 40 percent, and now, nearly half of the loans coming due are “underwater,” the panel said, making refinancing particularly difficult to secure.

As the panel notes, “Even borrowers who own profitable properties may be unable to refinance their loans as they face tightened underwriting standards, increased demands for additional investment by borrowers, and restricted credit.”

The COP says community banks, rather than large Wall Street institutions, face the greatest risk of insolvency due to mounting commercial real estate (CRE) loan losses. According to federal guidelines, 2,988 banks nationwide are classified as having a “CRE Concentration.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bankfailure; cre; default
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2010 3:51:59 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...

P!


2 posted on 02/14/2010 3:52:21 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Mark my words: $300B is just a drop in the bucket! ! ! !
ZERO pocket change. . . . .
3 posted on 02/14/2010 4:07:20 AM PST by DeaconRed (Everything Is Broken (RL Burnside) & Zero still blames Bush-So pour me another Tequila Sheila)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537
Obama will be remembered as “Trillion Dollar Man.”
4 posted on 02/14/2010 4:09:51 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“As the panel notes, “Even borrowers who own profitable properties may be unable to refinance their loans as they face tightened underwriting standards, increased demands for additional investment by borrowers, and restricted credit.””

Unless you have significant collateral you can forget a business loan.


5 posted on 02/14/2010 4:15:08 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The CRE snowball is beginning to roll. This will have significant downward pressure upon Wall Street and the markets. Flight will be to commodities which will lead to higher consumer prices and further contraction of consumer spending. 0 & Co. are getting exactly what they want.


6 posted on 02/14/2010 4:21:57 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
CRE is just the beginning of The Great Writedown.

Burn Baby Burn

7 posted on 02/14/2010 4:42:19 AM PST by Vet_6780 ("I see debt people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
"Unless you have significant collateral you can forget a business loan." Yes

The value of commercial real estate is heavily dependent on its stabilized cash flow, i.e., how much net income the property makes.

A lot of properties out there that made very good sense and had conservative loans on them have so dropped in value that they do not work with the current loans they have.

8 posted on 02/14/2010 5:05:05 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

I’m looking for office space right now. Negotiating is down to which office will give me the most free rent. Had one at 6 months free.


9 posted on 02/14/2010 5:16:59 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
If you are in the Washington, D.C. area you can do better.42 million square feet of pace are currently available. Go for the free rent and a huge Landlord buildout credit, no escalators etc. etc..

They will squeeze you eventually so get 'em while you can.

10 posted on 02/14/2010 5:41:41 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
“As the panel notes, “Even borrowers who own profitable properties may be unable to refinance their loans as they face tightened underwriting standards, increased demands for additional investment by borrowers, and restricted credit.””

Unless you have significant collateral you can forget a business loan.

Yep, the boxchecking auditors are in charge and clear the way 'cause the ball is rolling downhill.

11 posted on 02/14/2010 5:59:05 AM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

>>Flight will be to commodities

AKA more bullshyte manipulation of prices by “investors” - just as we saw with the manufactured oil prices when gas hit $5+ in 2008.

If you can’t/don’t intend to take physical delivery of the commodity you shouldn’t be allowed to trade....

Demand should be real - not a figment of Goldman’s trading accounts.


12 posted on 02/14/2010 7:22:24 AM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine
[The value of commercial real estate is heavily dependent on its stabilized cash flow]

Yep. Can't run a business on empty...



...this building on Space Center Drive / Technology Ct in Colorado Springs was completed in 2008. It has never been occupied. To me, it's the canary in the economic coal mine.
13 posted on 02/14/2010 7:37:37 AM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
If you can’t/don’t intend to take physical delivery of the commodity you shouldn’t be allowed to trade....

Agree 100%. Most people do not know that 4 men basically in NYC (4 firms) possessed 71% of all the oil futures contracts for July 2008.

And the SEC regulates how?

Food, clean water, oil and electrical power will be the commodities that are run on next. We've just witnessed this summer the use of a non-native minnow to fry 30% of the agriculture in central CA.

I say oil because Zeewoe's thugs, the EPA, etc. are on an all out push to ban exploratory drilling of the coasts off the US and all federal lands not covered to date.

14 posted on 02/14/2010 7:42:00 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
re #13.......wow...what a prime example as to why AIG and others have had to suck more on the taxpayers' teat.

I wonder whom all owns all the CDS junk paper on that money pit?

OF course, their prized CDS paper doesn't say spit about their percentage of investment on that address and its value/loan amount.

15 posted on 02/14/2010 7:46:47 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

The worst part of the AIG/CDS bailout is that many holders of credit default swaps did not even own the underlying securities - it was a novel way to short the securities. And we bailed them out on their bets against the economy.


16 posted on 02/14/2010 8:02:58 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

bump for later.


17 posted on 02/14/2010 8:16:56 AM PST by khnyny (Our government is becoming "The Committee of Public Safety")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
People need to understand the CDS/CDO false economy is a global snafu estimated to range between $500-$700 trillion.

A lot of fictional money was generated on the books that allowed investment firms to leverage practically everything to include commodities in the top 5 too (2008 oil /gas prices).

To this date there still has not been any regulations enacted to prevent banks from leveraging at 80:1, where the norm use to be 12:1, 15:1 tops.

That is the golden calf that the taxpayer paid for but 'they' keep.

Repeal of the Glass-Stegall Act under the GOP watch was the first step to the global rip-off.

Couple the fore mentioned with the recent SEC vote of 4-1 in January to enact rules ('legislation') to allow money market mutual funds / investment companies / banks to deny payouts to investors 'in the event of a crisis' even in proven & documented financial hardship really has soured my stomach.

No where in the 'rules' changes is it specified (I have read it several times) does is specify what constitutes 'a crisis'. That is one major loophole and a huge red flag.

Though the rule changes specifically addressed money market mutual funds, there is no grace period to prevent investment institutions from rolling all money market monies (bank CD's included) into a money market mutual fund w/o the investors consent.

Some major is coming down the tubes very very soon and it ain't no cake walk.

18 posted on 02/14/2010 8:38:24 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

Some major = some major convulsing sh$t


19 posted on 02/14/2010 8:40:41 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
Somebody is catching a major fanny whipping on that one. I wonder if the owners have turned the keys over to the bank yet.

Any big developer can stand a dead building or two. After that the carry multiplies to the point that it drags down other properties.

There is a domino effect,which only accelerates.

20 posted on 02/14/2010 8:44:10 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson