Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Biggirl

Michelle Malkin:
“”All well and good, but if the signers of all these new documents support political candidates who brazenly undermine the grand principles they put forth, what’s the point?””


2 posted on 02/16/2010 7:07:39 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: iowamark

Why do we need new documents? Why don’t they just sign copies of the one they have already sworn to uphold? The Constitution.


3 posted on 02/16/2010 7:11:14 AM PST by kalee (The offences we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

I know a lot of people have been dismissing this gathering. I don’t. While I won’t agree with every pol in that group, I do know they’re much closer to being CORRECT than a similarly gathered group from the leftists.

Heck, not every member of the first Constitutional Convention agreed with everyone else. :)

These folks know we folks in the Tea Party movement are not kidding around. We can’t be bought, we aren’t just playing games, and we respect Christianity, the Constitution, and Capitalism.

Strange then, that we can say along with the drug-induced British band “The Who” the words “Won’t Be Fooled Again!”


4 posted on 02/16/2010 7:12:51 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

We won’t know for sure until tomorrow, but if it is specific enough in its discussion of these principles (and their application), I think it could help. Many self-described conservatives do not quite “get” conservatism, or at least some of its crucial details. The right to freedom can be too easily dismissed by people saying, “There are limits to freedom,” a point that could be made in defense of every act of coercion. If more of us understood how the right to freedom works, as a self-limiting right (in that there is no right to the “freedom” to deprive others of their own freedom) I don’t think that this mistake would be made so frequently. That’s just an example, of course.

But my point is that the fact that these people signed the Mount Vernon Statement could cause others to read it and take it seriously, and if it were to turn out to be any good, that could cause the ocnservative community to become more focused and, on average, less confused as to what the conservative philosophy really is.

I don’t know why they didn’t just adopt the Twelve Points (http://conservatism.the12points.com; see also http://the12points.com), but with any luck, the Mount Vernon Statement will turn out to be worth something.


6 posted on 02/16/2010 3:12:48 PM PST by Duodecim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson