Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: svcw
A study just released said that the states that have had bans for two years have had no measurable decrease in accidents.

The study might just indicate poor enforcement or that hands free cell phones aren't any better. NJ has a handheld cell phone ban but I see cops themselves driving along with a cell phone pasted to their ear. Cell phone driving is as much a hazard now as drunk driving used to be. Many drivers could really use robotic driver assist as they are no longer really driving but just responding. Safe driving requires actively predicting the future a few seconds out, and that can't be done in the middle of a conversation.

53 posted on 02/19/2010 7:10:18 AM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Reeses

AAA did a five year study that said only 6% of accidents were caused by cell phone use.
Is using a cell phone a distraction, sure.
Is using a cell phone more of a distraction than eating, drinking a soda, listening to the radio, a crying baby strapped in a car seat, kids fighting in the back seat, talking to your passenger - I don’t think so.
The issues is distracted driving.


56 posted on 02/19/2010 7:13:38 AM PST by svcw (If you are going to quote the Bible know what you are quoting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson