The Ron Paul Delusion

What are we to make of the Republican Party's future now that libertarian Rep. Ron Paul won the presidential straw poll at the well-attended Conservative Political Action Conference last week?

Let's, for a moment, forget Paul (and how I wish this could be a permanent condition, considering the congressman is neither a serious politician nor -- and I can't stress this enough -- a serious thinker).

Libertarianism offers conservatives -- many of them new to political activism -- an earnest ideological alternative to the process-heavy politics that dominate Washington.

It allows Republicans to cleanse themselves of the GOP's failure to deliver on promises of smaller government and fiscal restraint.

None of which is new. The 1964 Barry Goldwater would be considered a libertarian today by many measures. The National Review constructed a "fusionist" effort to bring the parties together. Ronald Reagan explained to Reason magazine back in 1975 that "the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism."

Two sticking points preventing this fling from turning into something more serious have been social issues and war. Has anything changed to alter the dynamics of the relationship? Probably not.

Patrick Buchanan recently claimed that the GOP is showing signs of turning away from its recent foreign policy positions. The focus of policy may have changed -- and perhaps there's more reluctance in nation building -- but polls pretty clearly illustrate Republicans still believe in a robust and proactive national defense.

Social issues are far more complex -- and they always have been, despite caricatures. But the reality is that most of the cultural issues that divide Americans have been mired in political stalemates. You can debate abortion all day long; policy won't be changing.

Economics, on the other hand, touches almost everything in a tangible way. That -- and one of the most aggressive left-wing economic agendas in American history -- makes the libertarian fiscal message seductive.

"Congressman Paul is committed to bringing the conservative movement back to its traditional platform of limited government, balanced budgets and a foreign policy of nonintervention," claims Jesse Benton, Paul's spokesman.

If only it stopped there. Paul isn't a traditional conservative. His obsession with long-decided monetary policy and isolationism are not his only half-baked crusades. Paul's newsletters of the '80s and '90s were filled with anti-Semitic and racist rants, proving his slumming in the ugliest corners of conspiracyland today is no mistake.

Perhaps the greatest tragedy of Paul is that thousands of intellectually curious young people will have read his silly books, including "End the Fed," as serious manifestoes. Though you wouldn't know it by listening to Paul or reading his words, libertarians do have genuine ideas that conservatives might embrace.

A serious libertarian, David Boaz at the Cato Institute, found that 14 percent of American voters could be classified as libertarian. "Other surveys," he points out, "find a larger number of people who hold views that are neither consistently liberal nor conservative but are best described as libertarian."

Seeing as the two top concerns at CPAC were "reducing size of federal government" (35 percent) followed by "reducing government spending," it is obvious the message of individual freedom and small government has resonance. But accepting Ron Paul as the leader of this -- or, actually, any -- charge is a mistake for both parties.

And vitriolic too...

I get a kick out of the ones here - it's what keeps me coming back to such a hostile website. Amusing, in a sad sort of way.

they've already anointed her President and the primary hasn't even begun

You know, I hate to say it but I think Palin is about the best we can expect in 2012, at least as far as someone who has a realistic chance of winning goes.

There's a lot I like about her, but I suspect that she's weak on immigration and it looks like she's drank of the neocon kool-aide as far as foreign policy goes.

My guy as of now is Ron Paul...

Right there with you FRiend... probably not electable at the national level, we may not be able to force him to run this time, but he has my vote in 2012 if he wants it.

I have never resorted, in response, to their name-calling and the other childish stuff I've witnessed here. It's sad

You're a better man than I am then... I take as much as I can, but sometimes I just have to throw a personal insult back at 'em.

Got to be careful though. I've seen more than one libertarian-leaning freeper take personal attack after personal attack, finally throw one back and then get immediately banned.

You know the mods and owner have their pet neocons here that you just have to take it from. I try to just ignore them.

Actually got called out by one guy yesterday ("you wanna do something about it... well, do ya - PUNK!). I was very amused.

I'm getting up near 50 & I've been sitting at a desk for 25 yrs now, but I'm a big, ugly, mean-looking guy, and the thought of the wet stain on the front of their pants that I'd see if I actually ran into one of these keyboard warriors makes me laugh every time I get "threatened" by one of them.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.