Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

One way that Progressive Democrats have managed to keep alive their dead, defeated,

bankrupting theories on issues like so-called health care is by perverting the

definition of very basic terms.

The word “right” is one of the most glaring examples of a definition that’s been

distorted by the intellectual house-of-horrors mirror that is leftist theory.

Every American has the “right” to health care they argue.

They’re right. Every American does have a right to health care. In fact, they have

that “right” right now. They have the right to buy insurance. They have the right

to not buy insurance. They have the right to pay out of pocket. They have the

right get a second opinion. They have the right to rub a little dirt on it and suck

it up. They have a right to help out a friend in need. These are individual rights.

America is set upon individual rights.

What they don’t have is the “right” to health care in the perverted leftist sense

of the word.

A “right,” in the traditional American lexicon laid out by the likes of Thomas

Jefferson, is something that exists by virtue of our humanity. It is “inalienable”

and we are endowed with these rights by our creator. No government or

institution has the power to take away these rights. You exist, therefore these

rights exist.

In the leftist sense of the word, though, a “right” is something very different. In

fact, it’s not a “right” at all: it’s a handout provided to you by government, often

at exorbitant costs to society.

“I have the ‘right’ to health care!” the leftists demand angrily. “Therefore, the

government must provide it for me!” This is where they veer off course. You

do not have a ‘right to healthcare provided by government’. Or a house, or a

college degree or education, or car loan or food etc, etc, etc.

B-b-b-b-b-but!,” scream the leftists. “Insurance companies can already deny you

health care.”

No, they can’t. Insurance companies are certainly part of the problem. We’ve

grown to depend on them too much and on ourselves too little. The system does

need to be fixed.

But insurance companies cannot deny you the inalienable ”right” to health care.

They do not have that power. They can only choose not to pay for certain

procedures. You can still find another insurance company, seek help in a

different state, find a charitable doctor to pay for it, benefit from a fundraiser

or, worst-case scenario, benefit from the generosity of a well-funded, for-profit

private health care institution.

After all, you still have the “right” to find that care. Even in a worst-case

scenario in the current system, you only need the means.

But when government monopolizes the system, when government first decides

what kind of care you’ll get, and when government next decides if they’ll even

pay for it, your right to health care no longer exists


18 posted on 03/06/2010 5:09:18 PM PST by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Freddd

Very well written, thanks!


22 posted on 03/06/2010 5:39:04 PM PST by EmilyGeiger (Our constitution was written so that we could have equal opportunity, not equal results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Freddd
A “right,” in the traditional American lexicon laid out by the likes of Thomas Jefferson, is something that exists by virtue of our humanity. It is “inalienable” and we are endowed with these rights by our creator. No government or institution has the power to take away these rights. You exist, therefore these rights exist. In the leftist sense of the word, though, a “right” is something very different. In fact, it’s not a “right” at all: it’s a handout provided to you by government, often at exorbitant costs to society.

The ones who control the language end up controlling the agenda and that is why it is so important to stop such nonsense right in its tracks. Your definition of what is a right and what the left defines as a right should be ingrained into our youth along with a zillion of other 'agenda seizing words'. The words 'tolerance' and 'diversity' come to mind...along with 'choice', and so on....

25 posted on 03/06/2010 5:59:12 PM PST by Asfarastheeastisfromthewest... (“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false-face for the urge to rule it.”....Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Freddd
But when government monopolizes the system, when government first decides what kind of care you’ll get, and when government next decides if they’ll even pay for it, your right to health care no longer exists

Bravo.

31 posted on 03/06/2010 6:20:26 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Freddd

Very well said. I’m going to borrow heavily from that in future arguments and pretend it’s my own. :-)


51 posted on 03/09/2010 2:22:02 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson