Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On the Bubble (Major developments from the “yes” and “no” columns in the House)
Politico ^ | March 9, 2010

Posted on 03/09/2010 4:55:39 AM PST by Second Amendment First

UNDECIDED/LEANING UNDECIDED

UPDATED 3/8: Rep. Michael Arcuri (D-N.Y.) moved from "no" to "undecided." He told local media outlets on March 2 and March 7 that he was voting against reform. But his spokesman told the Plum Line blog on March 8 that he’s undecided. Arcuri voted for the House bill.

--Rep. Dan Maffei (D-N.Y.) voted yes on the House bill, but told the Syracuse paper March 8 the he is undecided on the final bill.

--Rep Bill Owens (D-N.Y.) voted yes on the House bill, but told the Syracuse paper March 8 the he is undecided on the final bill.

--Democratic Rep. Dan Lipinski of Illinois voted for the House bill but the Weekly Standard reported March 8 that he would not back a final bill that doesn’t include Stupak’s abortion language.

Democratic Rep. James Oberstar of Minnesota voted for the House bill but the Weekly Standard reported March 8 that he would not back a final bill that doesn’t include Stupak’s abortion language.

--Retiring Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.), who voted against the House bill, told CNN March 7 that he’s now undecided, but still might vote against a health care bill -- even if it kills reform.

--Rep. Jason Altmire (D-Pa.), who voted “no” on the House bill, told “Fox News Sunday” on March 7 that he’s not leaning one way or the other though he sounded more “yes” than “no.”

--Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nev.), a “yes” vote on the House bill, told the AP March 4 that she’s undecided.

--Retiring Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.) voted against the House bill but said in a statement March 4 that the president’s proposal is “moving in a more fiscally responsible direction.”

NO/LEANING NO

--Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.) won't be changing his "no" vote, The Hill reported March 8.

--Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.) won’t be changing his “no” votes, The Daily Caller reported March 8.

--Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) told MSNBC March 8 that he will vote against reform because he doesn’t “see the Senate bill as the solution.”

--On the March 7 edition of “Fox News Sunday,” Rep. John Adler (D-N.J.), a House bill “no” vote, said Speaker Pelosi hasn’t been working him to support reform.

--Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.), a House bill “yes” vote, told the NYT March 4 that she’s “not inclined to support” the Senate bill.

--Rep. Nathan Deal (R-Ga.) announced March 4 that he won’t resign from the House as planned on March 8 in order to stay and fight health reform, keeping one more “no” vote in the House and forcing Dems to get 217 votes instead of 216.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/09/2010 4:55:39 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Just by looking at that list, it is clearly the Republicans who are blocking this much needed reform!/sarc


2 posted on 03/09/2010 4:59:11 AM PST by stefanbatory (Weed out the RINOs! Sign the pledge. conservativepledge.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Nothing in the United States Constitution empowers the Federal Government to become as involved in people lives as this bill would enable to happen.

Why does NO ONE say this!

Put the U.S. Constitution away, out of view if it is not going to be used and we will heed our other cherished document, the Declaration of Independence.

It has the perscription for what to do with an over reaching government.


3 posted on 03/09/2010 5:05:47 AM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I thought Obama was focussed 100% on the economy and jobs??

I guess he really meant he’ll get around to that sometime when his ongoing health-care soap-opera wraps up....


4 posted on 03/09/2010 5:09:51 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory

Rat bastards aren’t “holding it up”, they’re “holding out” for the max they can whore themselves for.


5 posted on 03/09/2010 5:12:11 AM PST by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory

Any new current info on likelihood of passage in House?


6 posted on 03/09/2010 5:12:32 AM PST by newfreep (Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Follow the money...


7 posted on 03/09/2010 5:18:42 AM PST by Fresh Wind ("...a whip of political correctness strangles their voice"-Vaclav Klaus on GW skeptics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

Who will be the first Governor to utter these words again I wonder? If things keep going the way they are I truly think this will be the end result that's coming.

8 posted on 03/09/2010 5:18:46 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Retiring Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.) voted against the House bill but said in a statement March 4 . . .

that the president’s proposal is “moving in a more fiscally responsible direction.”

I am still trying to figure out how anyone can intellectually say something of this nature. They have to and are being asked to vote up or down on the "Senate" version.

No where in that version is the president's proposals PLUS . . .

They have to vote for the premiums on the "cadillac insurance"

Stearn and his minions get to pay extra !!

It will never be fixed because the American people will not accept any ammendment of that nature in future bills

9 posted on 03/09/2010 5:18:51 AM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

The left has succeeded in dumbing down the populace to the point that such a Constitutional argument might as well be spoken in Martian.

And the left DISDAINS the concept of the Constitution - limiting their ability to meddle in people’s lives.


10 posted on 03/09/2010 5:20:47 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
The Dems were out en mass yesterday claiming that no one can find the Stupak 12. That it is a myth.
11 posted on 03/09/2010 5:22:50 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Their DemocRATS!! Pelosi will get the votes by force, fear intimidation and bribery. So they’ll force Obamacare down our throats. Hopefully, we’ll have our day in Nov.


12 posted on 03/09/2010 5:27:38 AM PST by kenmcg (uicl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

I don’t have any...but I will say that the Democrats have the votes in the House to do whatever they want...but only if they disregard the wishes of their employers...


13 posted on 03/09/2010 5:38:44 AM PST by stefanbatory (Weed out the RINOs! Sign the pledge. conservativepledge.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Never, ever trust a Democrat.....


14 posted on 03/09/2010 5:40:03 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Well looking at that roll call, looks like a net loss of -5 to -7 for Pelosi. Altmire wll not vote for the bill, it would be a death sentence for his career. He sounds like Howdy Doody and the joke up here is he looks and acts like a marionette. I'd say that 198-200 votes yes is a good guess, 17 votes is alot to makeup. If there is no vote by Easter recess it's dead. So everyday we don't see Pelosi calling for a vote is a good thing. I expect by end of next week, the fervor in the MSM about getting this done to reach fever pitch with almost hourly stories of its inevitability, how “A Deal” has been reached.
15 posted on 03/09/2010 6:01:25 AM PST by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

Hope you are right on the count.


16 posted on 03/09/2010 6:03:23 AM PST by rlbedfor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

the blonde woman on Bret Baier’s Fox News panel...I think her name is Stoddard?...predicted they will all break “yea” the morning of the vote and then get the heck out of Dodge


17 posted on 03/09/2010 6:06:40 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

scuttlebutt is two BIG local Tea Parties being planned this week for Altmire’s PA offices


18 posted on 03/09/2010 6:07:25 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Haven’t we learned by now? This manufactured “suspense” is a farce. Nobody is really changing their stance, except in districts where it will reduce damage for the demonocrats, provided the bill itself passes.

The demoncrats move as one. There are no “moderates” who are on the fence.

The American public is once again being played. They already have the votes. The fix is already in. Wake up everyone.


19 posted on 03/09/2010 6:10:54 AM PST by Hazwaste (Some people are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
scuttlebutt is two BIG local Tea Parties being planned this week for Altmire’s PA offices

Great! We need to run a good candidate against him, not the same old RINO Melissa Hart.

20 posted on 03/09/2010 6:15:26 AM PST by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

I prefer Jay Cost’s blog here....... http://www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/

Here is what he has to say about the current state of affairs..........

Updated 3-9
Remember, check back in for updates as I find them. If you have news that I haven’t covered, send it my way! Also, you can follow me on Twitter for updates.

Current Categories (As of 1:30 AM 3/9)
Democrats Who Voted Nay in November
Very Hard to Persuade: 25
Hard to Persuade: 6
Persuadable: 6
Democrats Who Voted Yea in November
Suggested Might Now Vote Nay (Including Confirmed Stupak Democrats): 16
Other Possible Stupak Democrats: 10

Update, 1:30 AM 3/9 Adding Steve Kagen (WI-8) to the list of Democrats who voted yea in November but who are now undecided, thanks to this report:

(Fox News 11) asked the Congressmen from Northeast Wisconsin about voting on the Senate bill...
“Let me put it this way: you’re asking whether or not I trust the United States Senate, where they came up with a deal for Nebraska that the other states didn’t get; where Louisiana would get a special deal. No, I don’t trust the U.S. Senate,” said Rep. Steve Kagen (D-8th District). “So I think I’d like to have a vote on something very meaningful.”

Kagen said the health care bill should be split up into smaller bills.

“I have made the case to the speaker and also to the White House that we should take small pieces, small bites,” Kagen said. “In the practice of medicine, I can’t give a child a big pill. What do we do? We cut it up into pieces. Let’s find things we can agree on.”

Update, 6 PM 3/8 Adding Dan Maffei (NY-25) to the list of Democrats who voted yea in November but who are now undecided, thanks to this report, in which Maffei says, “The Senate bill, in my view, burns the village in order to save it. I will say, however, the president’s direct involvement gives me hope they will come up with a compromise.”

Update, 5:30 PM 3/8 Adding Henry Cuellar (TX-28) to the list of Democrats who voted yea in November but who are now undecided, thanks to this report. Also, Kathy Dahlkemper was on the list of suspected Stupak Democrats. Her representative confirms that the Senate abortion language is unacceptable, “period.” Thus, I move her to the list of Democrats who voted yea in November but who are now undecided.

Update, 12:15 PM 3/8: Moved Dan Lipinski (IL-3) to the category of Democrats who voted yea in November who have now explicitly said something negative about the current legislation. The Weekly Standard reports:


21 posted on 03/09/2010 6:16:55 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

Concur. This weekend will be a fever pitch and this whole drama is going to get very ugly.

The American people can still kill this if they rise up. The RATS are banking on wearing us down.


22 posted on 03/09/2010 6:18:22 AM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

They go home after voting yes? You want to see riots? Stoddard has been wrong before. Did anyone on the panel disagree with her?


23 posted on 03/09/2010 6:21:29 AM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787
Yes, like Maha Rushie said this is a psyops campaign straight form the Obama himself. Plant news stories of it's inevitability, how there is a tidal wave coming, how day after day votes are swinging his way. This is the crown jewel of socialism and the 5th colum and the statists know the stakes are this high. We have some Democrats who are having honey poured in their ears and being fed lies by the Whorehouse and the leadership and it's our job to "Shake them the hell out of it.";. Don't believe the news folks until the votes are cast, keep fighting, the MSM lies.
24 posted on 03/09/2010 6:27:32 AM PST by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“Code Red” - House Target List on Health Care
The National Republican Congressional Committee has published a target list on health care. In addition to continuing to contact the five Tennessee Democrat Congressmen, you can go http://www.votervoice.net/link/clickthrough/ext/94697.aspx to contact some of these targets. Much of the talk following Obama’s announcement has focused on how to defeat this second bill through reconciliation, but that is misleading because the first step to defeating Obamacare is not by concentrating on defeating the “fixer” bill but by defeating the Senate bill in the House when it goes to the floor for an up-or-down vote on Thursday, March 18th.
Rep. Lincoln Davis 202-225-6831 Columbia office: 931-490-8699
Rep. Jim Cooper 202-225-4311 Nashville office: 615-736-5295
Rep. Bart Gordon 202-225-4231 Murfreesboro office: 615-896-1986
Rep. John S. Tanner 202-225-4714 Jackson office: 731-423-4848
Rep. Steve Cohen 202-225-3265 Memphis office: 901-544-4131

.....................................................

Defeat Obamacare call list: Courtsey of TN Eagle Forum: List now contains the new MAYBES culled from FR posts.

PLEASE CALL! DC OFFICE LOCAL OFFICE State District

Harry Mitchell (202) 225-2190 (480) 946-2411 AZ 5th District
Gabrielle Giffords (202) 225-2542 (520) 881-3588 AZ 8th District
Ann Kirkpatrick (202) 225-2315 (928) 226-6914 AZ 1st District
Jerry McNerney (202) 225-1947 925-833-0643 CA 11th District
John Salazar 202-225-4761 970-245-7107 CO 3rd District
Jim Himes (202) 225-5541 (866) 453-0028 CT 4th District
Alan Grayson (202) 225-2176 (407) 841-1757 FL 8th District
Bill Foster (202) 225-2976 630-406-1114 IL 14th District
Baron Hill 202 225 5315 812 288 3999 IN 9th District
Mark Schauer (202) 225-6276 (517) 780-9075 MI 7th District
Gary Peters (202) 225-5802 (248) 273-4227 MI 9th District
Dina Titus (202) 225-3252 702-256-DINA (3462) NV 3rd District
Carol Shea-Porter (202) 225-5456 (603) 743-4813 NH 1st District
Tim Bishop (202) 225-3826 (631) 696-6500 NY 1st District
John Hall (202) 225-5441 (845) 225-3641 x49371 NY 19th District
Bill Owens (202) 225-4611 (315) 782-3150 NY 23rd District
Mike Arcuri (202)225-3665 (315)793-8146 NY 24th District
Dan Maffei (202) 225-3701 (315) 423-5657 NY 25th District
Earl Pomeroy (202) 225-2611 (701) 224-0355 ND At-Large District
Steven Driehaus (202) 225-2216 (513) 684-2723 OH 1st District
Mary Jo Kilroy (202) 225-2015 (614) 294-2196 OH 15th District
Zach Space (202) 225-6265 (330) 364-4300 OH 18th District
Kathy Dahlkemper (202) 225-5406 (814) 456-2038 PA 3rd District
Patrick Murphy (202) 225-4276 (215) 826-1963 PA 8th District
Christopher Carney (202) 225-3731 (570) 585-9988 PA 10th District
Paul Kanjorski (202) 225-6511 (570) 825-2200 PA 11th District
John Spratt (202) 225-5501 (803)327-1114 SC 5th District
Tom Perriello (202) 225-4711 (276) 656-2291 VA 5th District
Alan Mollohan (202) 225-4172 (304) 623-4422 WVA 1st District
Nick Rahall (202) 225-3452 (304) 252-5000 WVA 3rd District
Steve Kagen (202) 225-5665 (920) 437-1954 WI 8th District
Bart Gordon (202) 225-4231 TN (MAYBE)
Bart Stupak (202) 225 4735 MI (MAYBE)
Brian Baird (202) 225-3536, Vancouver, (360) 695-6292. Olympia, (360) 352-9768, (MAYBE)
senator mark begich (202) 224-3004 toll free. (877) 501 - 6275 just became a MAYBE
John Tanner (202) 225-4714, Union City, (731) 885-7070, Jackson Phone: (731) 423-4848, Millington (901) 873-5690 TN (MAYBE)
Jason Altmire 202-225-2565, Aliquippa, 724-378-0928, Natrona Heights, 724-226-1304 (MAYBE)


25 posted on 03/09/2010 6:30:32 AM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste
The American public is once again being played. They already have the votes. The fix is already in. Wake up everyone.

If they had the votes already they would have voted already so as not to have anyone waver and fall off the wagon. They do not have the votes yet. They want everyone to think it is inevitable and that the Prez is generating some momentum.

26 posted on 03/09/2010 6:34:22 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

I think you are correct about the Dems and MSM trying desperately to say that Obama has his mojo back and people are coming around to ObamaCare. Unfortunately for them, Rasmussen is showing dear leader at -19% favorable/unfavorable so obviously the bitter clingers are not listening to the media or the POTUS.

I think the media has failed to grasp the most important thing about Obama. Obama was elected because of what he said. The media fell in love with his words, and ignored his deeds. From Rev Wright to the most liberal voting record in the Senate, the MSM was basically an advertising arm for Obama 08.

Now that Obama is POTUS, the media still shills for him relentlessly, with tingles up their leg and all. The DIFFERENCE now is that the people are not just LISTENING to what Obama says, they are WATCHING what he is DOING. They still like his WORDS, but they now realize his words do not match up to his deeds. The left saw him as the anti-Bush, who would end the wars, try the CIA waterboarders, close GITMO, enact universal health care, etc, etc, etc. Obama has talked a good game to them, but is too weak for their liking.

The BIGGER problem is the independant bitter clingers. The hope and change talk of Obama is not matched by his takeover of the auto industry, takeover of the banking industry, and now his attempted takeover of their health care. They did not vote for this kind of change. Obama’s words do not match what he is doing, and people no longer believe his words, or those of the media who shill for him.

The key question is whether the Rats in the HOuse realize Obama is playing them for fools too. I think they are starting to see the light about how Obama could care less about their political future, he is only intent on his own vision for America. Whether enough have the balls to stand up to Rahm/Obama/Pelosi is an open question. I actually think momentum is starting to go against the POTUS on health care, regardless of what the media is saying. I listened to a House whip for the Dems yesterday and he said they only have about 200 votes right now.


27 posted on 03/09/2010 6:47:19 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: reaganator
Nothing in the United States Constitution empowers the Federal Government to become as involved in people lives as this bill would enable to happen. Why does NO ONE say this! Put the U.S. Constitution away, out of view if it is not going to be used and we will heed our other cherished document, the Declaration of Independence. It has the perscription for what to do with an over reaching government.

You may be missing the point. The Constitution protects nothing. It is a set of rules, the effectiveness of which depends on the willingness of We the People to accept and follow them. But:

"We have no government armed in power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other." -- John Adams

What we're seeing is not a failure of government, per se -- that's just the symptom. Rather, it's a failure of morals ... and we're all guilty of it, possibly conservatives most of all. We wave the Constitution around like it's a magic talisman, expecting all in view to abide by it out of sheer awe ... because it's The Constitution, after all.

It's not enough simply to wave the Constitution -- the principles it embodies require defense. And the type of defense required has to do more with morals and responsibility than anything else: we need to convince people that it's better to be moral and responsible for their actions: rights are fine, but responsibility and duty are more important, even though less fun.

But we're lazy, and we have short attention spans, and we're continually being outflanked by a group of folks who have created a wonderful story about how the government can relieve us of our responsibilities. And we don't have a good response to that.

28 posted on 03/09/2010 6:58:39 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

expect most of the undecided and leaning no to break yes once they strike their deal. They have seen how to play it.


29 posted on 03/09/2010 7:08:02 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

Yeah, if the Dims had the votes they would have already voted for it. That’s probably the best indicator, IMO. I quit listening to what these guys say a long, long time ago (both sides of the aisle). You can just about count on whatever they say being the exact polar opposite from the truth.....


30 posted on 03/09/2010 7:42:05 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
Good stuff. Try to find Hannity’s great American panel video from last night. Beckel was hot and spewing his own kind of hate. Really showed his hand.
31 posted on 03/09/2010 9:10:45 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush
If they had the votes already they would have voted already so as not to have anyone waver and fall off the wagon. They do not have the votes yet. They want everyone to think it is inevitable and that the Prez is generating some momentum.

They want everyone to think that there is a chance it will not pass. All that remains is figuring out who votes "No" to retain their seat, and who votes "Yes" to take one for the party. But they've already got the votes.

As history tells us, this "suspense" is being manufactured by the Demonicrats for the public's consumption, to put forth an illusion that the party has moderates and conservatives. P.T. Barnum lives.

32 posted on 03/09/2010 10:07:07 AM PST by Hazwaste (Some people are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste
As history tells us, this "suspense" is being manufactured by the Demonicrats for the public's consumption, to put forth an illusion that the party has moderates and conservatives. P.T. Barnum lives.

I wish I had access to your sources.

33 posted on 03/09/2010 10:33:44 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush
I wish I had access to your sources.

How many times do they have to pull the same trick before we figure out there's no marble under the cups?

34 posted on 03/09/2010 11:09:16 AM PST by Hazwaste (Some people are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste

Not sure I follow you, but press on. You may be wrong, but you are never in doubt.


35 posted on 03/09/2010 5:37:52 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

Please be right!!!!! I live up North of Pittsburgh....Altmire is a marionette...but I will call more than once!


36 posted on 03/09/2010 9:03:39 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
“The Senate bill, in my view, burns the village in order to save it." -Dan Maffei (NY-25).

You just now figured this out? More like curing the disease by killing the patient.

37 posted on 03/12/2010 8:16:14 PM PST by UAConservative (Audemus Jura Nostra Defendere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

HERE IS MY OWN LIST OF 13 KEY TARGETS.
* = Voted for Stupak Amd. (Y/N) = previous vote on House bill.

Suzanne Kosmas (Fla.) (N) her 2010 race will be tighter
Brad Ellsworth (Ind.) * (Y) Senate hopeful who is supporter of Stupak language
Kathy Dahlkemper (Pa.) * (Y) STUPAK
Jerry Costello (Ill.) * (Y) STUPAK
Jason Altmire (Pa.) * (N) said on Fox has “open mind.” no in committee and on floor
Sanford Bishop Jr. (Ga.) * (Y) Favors Stupak provision
John Boccieri (Ohio) * (N) GOP target
Rick Boucher (Va.) (N) GOP target
Allen Boyd (Fla.) (N) Facing primary challenge
Solomon Ortiz (Texas) * (Y) STUPAK
Alan Mollohan (W.Va.) * (Y) he’s in a tight race (NRLC score of 97%)
Bart Gordon (Tenn.) * (N) Retiring committee chairman
John Tanner (Tenn.) * (N) House deputy whip not running for reelection, Voted no in committee and on floor

anyone got local phone numbers in their district?


38 posted on 03/13/2010 1:47:28 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

“Fiscally responsible” by gutting Medicare!! The Democratic physicians know this will save money when those pesky senior citizens start dropping like flies. And the Comparative Effectiveness Committee chairman, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel will make sure that care is denied. Saves tons of money.Fixes Social Security as well. No more 30 years of retirement.


39 posted on 03/14/2010 5:47:30 PM PDT by Semperfiwife (My doctor is NOT a congressman. They have not healed anyone, but hurt plenty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Where the heck are the polls? The most recent polls I can find with a quick googling are a week or more old.


40 posted on 03/14/2010 6:10:07 PM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste
But they've already got the votes.

I don't think so. I think the most they have is 201 yeas, and that is likely to FALL not rise as it becomes clear to some members in vulnerable seats that the bill will fail, and they have nothing to gain by casting a yes vote and everything to gain by appearing to be courageous.

I also see this aas an opportunity for a revolt against Nancy Pelosi. This bill fails and she is diminished. Politics being the ruthless game it is, there may be some who will vote no for no other reason that to bring Pelosi down, once they see that outcome in the cards anyway.

41 posted on 03/15/2010 6:59:30 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

“Jerry Costello (Ill.) * (Y) STUPAK”

On this morning’s radio news, Congressman Costello said he was a “no” vote, because he thinks the federal government should be concentrating on jobs - not health care.

I hope that he is sincere - not just holding out for a porkulus handout of some sort.


42 posted on 03/15/2010 7:19:37 AM PDT by SelmaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SelmaLee

Selma,
that is significant. Costello. Not just because his vote puts some counts up now to ‘214 NO’, but because if Pelosi has failed so totally with Costello, then she is likely failing with so many others on that list.


43 posted on 03/15/2010 8:26:53 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: reaganator
Obama is asking for a “Simple up or down vote.” What he is trying to do usually requires a constitutional amendment, ratified by 2/3 of the states.
44 posted on 03/15/2010 2:45:08 PM PDT by NJJ (Support al Qaeda . . . Give to the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NJJ
"Obama is asking for a “Simple up or down vote.”

Well bring it on. Let's vote today! The Republicans should call them on this and remind the world that it is Obama and Pelosi who are dragging their feet on a vote.

45 posted on 03/16/2010 7:30:05 AM PDT by cookcounty (Let us not speak of the honor of men. Rather, let us bind them with the Constitution. --Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
I don't think so.

Sadly, I'm afraid I hit the nail directly on the head.

46 posted on 03/21/2010 6:58:00 PM PDT by Hazwaste (Democrats are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste

Yes, and if ever we needed as a Nation to be sheltered by the Almighty, now is the time.


47 posted on 03/21/2010 7:22:54 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush
Not sure I follow you, but press on. You may be wrong, but you are never in doubt.

Nope, wasn't in doubt. And wasn't wrong either.

48 posted on 08/01/2010 11:16:48 AM PDT by Hazwaste (Democrats are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste
Nope, wasn't in doubt. And wasn't wrong either.

Hey! I guess your head was finally able to get squeezed back into the forum. Better not stay too long, you might not be able to get back out.

49 posted on 08/01/2010 11:27:13 AM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush
Hey! I guess your head was finally able to get squeezed back into the forum. Better not stay too long, you might not be able to get back out.

That explains why your head is still stuck where it is.

50 posted on 08/02/2010 3:53:51 PM PDT by Hazwaste (Democrats are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson