Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five Myths about Same Sex Marriage
Townhall.com ^ | March 9, 2010 | Janice Shaw Crouse

Posted on 03/09/2010 12:18:39 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-233 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2010 12:18:39 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Myth #2: Same-sex “marriage” is an “equal rights” issue.

Gays already have equal rights.

Any gay man can marry any unmarried woman he chooses, and no straight man can marry another man.

Civil rights don't extend to preferences.

2 posted on 03/09/2010 12:26:00 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Myth #3: Any group of people — including homosexual couples — can contribute to the well-being of children and form a productive unit of society.”

this is the most grievously damaging myth...it is a simple fact that children do better when they are from stable opposite sex, 2 parent homes. Period. That is the optimum.


3 posted on 03/09/2010 12:27:43 PM PST by jessduntno (Read the mainstream media. Do the opposite. You can't go wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Homosexuals marrying is not "marriage". It is a mockery of marriage.

I also agree with the article in that, when two men or two women are considered a "married" couple, then the floodgates will open. If there is nothing special about marriage being between one man and one woman, than what is so special about the number two?

4 posted on 03/09/2010 12:29:38 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Quix

Ping.


5 posted on 03/09/2010 12:32:38 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (ONLINE TAX REVOLT 150,000 AND GROWING. http://www.onlinetaxrevolt.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Myth #1: It doesn’t hurt straights financially.

It’s an insurance scam.


6 posted on 03/09/2010 12:34:10 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (ONLINE TAX REVOLT 150,000 AND GROWING. http://www.onlinetaxrevolt.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
On Myth 2, it assumes that there is a right to marriage. This is simply not true; I cannot marry a close relative, nor can I marry someone who isn't willing to become married to me. I can't marry a 5-year-old, nor an animal of any kind, or figment of my imagination. There are so many restrictions on marriage, same sex marriage is hardly a basic rights issue.
7 posted on 03/09/2010 12:34:36 PM PST by In veno, veritas (Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I have a friend who wants to marry a hamster, and another who wants to marry his blowup doll.

Well, maybe not, but ....


8 posted on 03/09/2010 12:35:39 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (ONLINE TAX REVOLT 150,000 AND GROWING. http://www.onlinetaxrevolt.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A person born blind can never become an airline pilot unless his sight is restored. The rights of the passengers to a safe flight trumpt the right of of the blind person to pursue the profession of his choice.

By the same token, the rights of children to as normal as possible of an upbringing ought to trumpt the right of gays to raise children. A turkey baster is not a father.

9 posted on 03/09/2010 12:36:00 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump for later, to send to some liberal friends...


10 posted on 03/09/2010 12:36:09 PM PST by Constitution Day (Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

Satan tends to do this.

Take something holy and wholesome and make a mockery of it.

For example, the “mark of the beast” is simply a parody/mockery of the “mark of the Lamb”.


11 posted on 03/09/2010 12:36:49 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas

It’s also a redefinition. How about I call my computer a gun and say, “The right to own computer-guns cannot be infringed.”

Or instead of a computer, I call an alias a gun. “The right to own an alias-gun cannot be infringed.”


12 posted on 03/09/2010 12:37:52 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (ONLINE TAX REVOLT 150,000 AND GROWING. http://www.onlinetaxrevolt.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

And a judge can’t be blind either. Needs to be able to size up witnesses’ body language ... oh wait. Some judges are blind.


13 posted on 03/09/2010 12:39:14 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (ONLINE TAX REVOLT 150,000 AND GROWING. http://www.onlinetaxrevolt.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My homosexual cousin wishes to ‘marry’ is longtime boyfriend.

A very small part of me wishes them happiness.

However, whenever I read his face book rantings regarding Religion especially Christianity, I see a seriously confused young man whose extreme hatred of all that is Religious just might be a cry for help and a thin disguise for self hatred regarding his chosen sexuality.


14 posted on 03/09/2010 12:40:52 PM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
this is the most grievously damaging myth...it is a simple fact that children do better when they are from stable opposite sex, 2 parent homes. Period. That is the optimum.
That is true, but stable two parent heterosexual homes are in the minority these days.

The real question you should be asking is, which is better, a single parent home or a gay one? I've seen a lot of single parent families where the parents are absolutely *worthless* , I've also seen homosexual(male) couples who absolutely doted on their children and raised them right.

The real question should be "should we allow incompetent or unwilling people to be parents?". Marriage died as an institution in the '60s. Society is falling apart and so far the best options we, as conservatives, can come up with is flailing around at a bunch of homos. Which is just the tip of a very large iceberg.

15 posted on 03/09/2010 12:42:11 PM PST by ketsu (ItÂ’s not a campaign. ItÂ’s a taxpayer-funded farewell tour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz
Let's not use the word "marriage" in the context of homosexual perverts.

May I suggest "Certificated Sodomy" as an alternative?

16 posted on 03/09/2010 12:42:13 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Forgive the imagery, but can two people of the same sex ‘consummate’ a marriage? If you go by the dictionary definition, there is an argument to be made that only a man and a woman can. How long before some lawyer argues that his gay married client is entitled to an annulment on that basis??


17 posted on 03/09/2010 12:42:28 PM PST by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Exactly! Traditional marriage is equally available to heterosexuals and homosexuals. Homosexuals (most anyway) freely choose not to enter into it, to pursue a different lifestyle that precludes marriage.

I think debunking the “civil rights issue” lie is key to winning people over. Most Americans are very passionate about civil rights (as they should be) and the homosexulists know this and use it to manipulate people.


18 posted on 03/09/2010 12:45:21 PM PST by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

“The real question you should be asking is...”

Well, if that were a question I wanted to ask, perhaps. But I was making a statement about what the optimum situation for children is...that is my opinion. People should be grown ups and realize they need to take care of their kids no matter what, of course. But I was simply making a statement about what is FAR AND AWAY the best situation...don’t see why we need to stop stating that...I don’t think “single parenting” is too hot either, personally. Sorry.


19 posted on 03/09/2010 12:45:57 PM PST by jessduntno (Read the mainstream media. Do the opposite. You can't go wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bump


20 posted on 03/09/2010 12:48:38 PM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-233 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson