Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hegel's Dialectic: Erasing Christianity through the Psycho-Political 'Consensus Process'
Renew America ^ | March 15, 2010 | Linda Kimball

Posted on 03/16/2010 5:04:11 AM PDT by spirited irish

Julian Huxley, the head of UNESCO in 1947, wrote a book titled, “UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.” His book was a blueprint for a New World Order that called for a single 'new' spirituality---a mixture of Buddhist materialist-pantheism, Liberalized 'pantheistic' Christianity, Gnosticism, and other occult traditions--- one language, and one way of thinking. He believed a global order could be brought about through the universal implementation of Hegel’s Dialectic process. Huxley observed,

“The task before UNESCO…is to help the emergence of a single world culture with its own philosophy and background of ideas and with its own broad purpose.”

Huxley spoke of two opposing worldviews---one founded on supernatural creation and the other on atheist evolutionism--confronting each other from the West and the East. In describing them he said,

“You may categorize the two philosophies as…individualism versus collectivism or as the American versus the Russian…or as capitalism versus communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism. Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? I believe…this can happen…through the inexorable dialectic of evolution.” (

The concept of dialectics has been around for a long time. In the American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828, Noah Webster defined dialectics as: “That branch of logic which teaches the rules and modes of reasoning.” Simply stated, dialectics refers to ‘position’ versus ‘opposition’ or ‘thesis’ versus ‘antithesis,' or 'truth' versus 'falsehood.’ By the traditional rules of conduct, if thesis is correct then it follows logically that antithesis is incorrect.

Georg Hegel, a master magician in the Hermetic tradition and an Enlightenment shock trooper of evil, discarded the rules and turned the concept upside-down by equalizing thesis and antithesis, which resulted in moral relativity. ‘New truth,’ a merging of truth and falsehood and/or Buddhist materialist-pantheism and Christianity for example, is now found in something called ‘synthesis,' or 'consensus,' the favored vernacular of Progressive Liberals.

Hegelian Dialect is a perfect example of what J. Budziszewski, the author of "What We Can’t Not Know" termed the “black magic spells of imposture and unraveling.” Hegel’s form of dialectics is an impostor and its' purpose is to deceptively unravel truth and norms and then replace them with a ‘new truth’ which is yet another impostor.

Hegel’s ‘black magic’ Dialectics is the strange fire fueling the weapon of mass destruction unwittingly wielded by mind-conditioned Americans and Westerners on behalf of Transnational Progressive New Agers and fellow travelers in their war against the West's traditional Christian-based worldview and cultural infrastructure.

Called “group dynamics” or the “consensus process,” Hegel's dialectic is a psycho political behavior and belief modification technique used with great success by Vietnamese communists against American POWs and by Chinese communists against dissidents.

The foundation and key strategy of the consensus process is the knowledge that all individuals have an inherent fear of being alienated from the group. During sensitivity-training and diversity-training sessions, skillful change-agents (facilitators) psychologically manipulate this fear to herd selected victims toward a preplanned conclusion that induces them to compromise both conscience and position. This is the consensus process in a nut shell, and when we hear Liberals screaming for ‘consensus,' they’re really demanding that they be allowed to ‘facilitate’ the compromise of conscience which leads to the abandonment of Christian-based Western ideals and principles.

There are three steps to the consensus process. They are called, “Unfreezing the present level, moving to the new level, and freezing group life on the new level.” In order to speed up the unfreezing phase, communists resorted to physical torture, shock 'therapy,' and mind-altering drugs. In America, emotional pain, intimidation, and fear are precipitated by way of vicious psychological bullying such as sadistic ridicule, character assassination, destructive criticism, labeling, and spreading lies. Until total control has been achieved, psycho politics will remain the preferred method.

There are four key elements necessary for a successful ‘consensus process’ operation. They are:

1.Multicultural and/or diverse groups, for instance 'gays,' atheists, Wiccans, or Muslims, fueled by resentment and envy---necessary for causing social conflict.

2.A traditional social or cultural issue around which conflict can be created. For example, the Boy Scouts, Christmas, traditional marriage, and male-female sex norms are demonized as ‘unfair, exclusionary, insensitive, intolerant, racist, homophobic, and hurtful’ to diverse groups.

3.The dialoguing to consensus process.

4.The predetermined outcome. For example: Christmas parades successfully recast as "Festival of Lights” or “Winter Holiday” parades that are inclusive of gay 'erotomaniac' celebrants; traditional marriage compromised by 'gay' unions.

The consensus process has been so successful at unraveling the West's traditional culture that here in America for example, Christianity has been banned from government on all levels as well as from schools and increasingly from public areas. Christians have lost their jobs, been jailed, and their children harassed and even suspended for daring to express their Christian beliefs in any way. Anti-Christian bigotry has become so bad that John Gibson observed,

“There is this kind of casual and accepted bias against Christians and Christian symbols.” (The War on Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday is Worse Than You Thought, John Gibson).

Shock-troopers of evil concur:

“We have battled in America since the century’s turn to bring to nothing…all Christian influences and we are succeeding. You must work until officials of city, county, and state will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies. (there must) be a…foaming hatred of religion…a belief that Christian practice is vicious, bad, insanity causing, publicly hated and intolerable.” (Red Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics)

“I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology. Its importance has been…increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.” Bertrand Russell

John Gibson asked a Eugene, Oregon city manager why he had banned Christmas trees. His politically correct mind-conformed response, “Well, because they’re Christian.”

This manager and countless scores of other Americans testify to the enormous success thus far achieved by psycho political operatives. Having been “unfrozen” from the level whereon America’s traditional worldview resides and successfully ‘moved’ to the desired level and then ‘frozen’ there, they now serve their new masters evil desires by mindlessly destroying the source of both their liberties and their human worth---Christianity.

“Oh but, Christianity has nothing to do with either the founding of our nation or with our rights and freedoms,” proclaim mind-conditioned scoffers, doubters, atheists, and skeptics both here in America and throughout the West. The truth however has been ‘hiding’ in full view, but because their minds are darkened by black magic spells and their eyes made sightless by black magic dust, the mind-conditioned cannot see Truth even when it looks them in the face. In boasting of his clever blueprint, Huxley for example, unwittingly ‘confessed’ the truth when he said of the two opposing philosophies, “You may categorize the two philosophies as…Christianity versus Marxism.”

Copyright Linda Kimball 2010

Note: This article was originally published in 2005. This is the updated version.

Linda writes on culture, politics, scientism, and worldview.

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: atheism; corruption; evil; liberalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 03/16/2010 5:04:11 AM PDT by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: betty boop; Alamo-Girl; marron; Quix


2 posted on 03/16/2010 5:05:33 AM PDT by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg; MHGinTN; Godzilla


3 posted on 03/16/2010 5:07:32 AM PDT by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish



4 posted on 03/16/2010 5:15:26 AM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

"Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal".--James (Jim) Cone,
African American Religious Thought: An Anthology (Paperback)
by Cornel West (Editor), Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (Editor)

SEAN HANNITY: But Reverend Jeremiah Wright is not backing down and has not for years and in his strong stance on the teaching of black liberation theology is nothing new. He had the same things to say last spring when he appeared on "Hannity & Colmes:"

WRIGHT: If you're not going to talk about theology in context, if you're not going to talk about liberation theology that came out of the '60s, systematized black liberation theology that started with Jim Cone in 1968 and the writings of Cone and the writings of Dwight Hopkins and the writings of womynist theologians and Asian theologians and Hispanic theologians, then you can't talk about the black value system.

HANNITY: But I'm a — reverend

WRIGHT: Do you know liberation theology, sir?,2933,354158,00.html

"Their founding document [the Weather Underground's] called for the establishment of a "white fighting force" to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement" and other "anti-colonial" movements[1] to achieve "the destruction of US imperialism and the achievement of a classless world: world communism."..."-Berger, Dan (2006). Outlaws of America: The Weather Underground and the Politics of Solidarity. AK Press, 95.

Outlaws of America: The Weather Underground and the Politics of Solidarity (Paperback) by Dan Berger

Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright and Dr. William Ayers
are greeted by Rebekah Levin with the Committee
for a Just Peace in Israel and Palestine.
(Chuck Berman/Chicago Tribune / May 17, 2009),0,6689521.story

From the New York Times, August 24, 2003

"they [the Weather Underground] employed revolutionary jargon, advocated armed struggle and black liberation and began bombing buildings, taking responsibility for at least 20 attacks. Estimates of their number ranged at times from several dozen to several hundred."

Article: Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded

5 posted on 03/16/2010 5:16:44 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Obama's Church: Gospel of Hate
Kathy Shaidle,
Monday, April 07, 2008

In March of 2007, FOX News host Sean Hannity had engaged Obama’s pastor in a heated interview about his Church’s teachings. For many viewers, the ensuing shouting match was their first exposure to "Black Liberation Theology"...

Like the pro-communist Liberation Theology that swept Central America in the 1980s and was repeatedly condemned by Pope John Paul II, Black Liberation Theology combines warmed-over 1960s vintage Marxism with carefully distorted biblical passages. However, in contrast to traditional Marxism, it emphasizes race rather than class. The Christian notion of "salvation" in the afterlife is superseded by "liberation" on earth, courtesy of the establishment of a socialist utopia.

Catholics for Marx [Liberation Theology]
By Fr. Robert Sirico | Thursday, June 03, 2004

In the days when the Superpowers were locked in a Cold War, Latin America seethed with revolution, and millions lived behind an iron curtain, a group of theologians concocted a novel idea within the history of Christianity. They proposed to combine the teachings of Jesus with the teachings of Marx as a way of justifying violent revolution to overthrow the economics of capitalism.

The Gospels were re-rendered not as doctrine impacting on the human soul but rather as windows into the historical dialectic of class struggle. These "liberation theologians" saw every biblical criticism of the rich as a mandate to expropriate the expropriating owners of capital, and every expression of compassion for the poor as a call for an uprising by the proletarian class of peasants and workers.

6 posted on 03/16/2010 5:17:35 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

Oh, and the scary thing is, it’s worked; it’s working and it will work. It does because it requires a great deal of intelligence and resolve to successfully combat it. Those qualities are sadly lacking.

7 posted on 03/16/2010 5:18:17 AM PDT by glide625 (50+% of American Voters Elected Obama: Never Forget; Never Forgive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

From "45 Communist Goals":
#27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion.
8 posted on 03/16/2010 5:20:13 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish


9 posted on 03/16/2010 5:20:54 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

‘You will be hated by all because of My name, but the one who endures to the end, he will be saved.’

This ‘consensus process’ will not work on those with true faith....Catholic or our Protestant Brothers and Sisters...


10 posted on 03/16/2010 5:21:11 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Real Story Behind Rev. Wright's Controversial Black Liberation Theology Doctrine
Monday , May 5, 2008
FoxNews/Hannity's America
[special Friday night edition--original airdate May 2, 2008]

(some key excerpts)

["(Jose) Diaz-Balart is the son of Rafael Diaz-Balart y Guitierrez (a former Cuban politician). He has three bothers, Rafael Diaz-Balart (a banker), Mario Diaz-Balart (a US Congressman) and Lincoln Diaz-Balart (also a US Congressman). His aunt, Mirta Diaz-Balart, was Fidel Castro's first wife."]

JOSE DIAZ-BALART, TELEMUNDO NETWORK: "Liberation theology in Nicaragua in the mid-1980's was a pro-Sandinista, pro-Marxist, anti-U.S., anti-Catholic Church movement. That's it. No ifs, ands, or buts. His church apparently supported, in the mid-'80s in Nicaragua, groups that supported the Sandinista dictatorships and that were opposed to the Contras whose reason for being was calling for elections. That's all I know. I was there.

I saw the churches in Nicaragua that he spoke of, and the churches were churches that talked about the need for violent revolution and I remember clearly one of the major churches in Managua where the Jesus Christ on the altar was not Jesus Christ, he was a Sandinista soldier, and the priests talked about the corruption of the West, talked about the need for revolution everywhere, and talked about 'the evil empire' which was the United States of America."

REV. BOB SCHENCK, NATIONAL CLERGY COUNCIL: "it's based in Marxism. At the core of his [Wright's] theology is really an anti-Christian understanding of God, and as part of a long history of individuals who actually advocate using violence in overthrowing those they perceive to be oppressing them, even acts of murder have been defended by followers of liberation theology. That's very, very dangerous."

SCHENCK: "I was actually the only person escorted to Dr. Wright. He asked to see me, and I simply welcomed him to Washington, and then I said Dr. Wright, I want to bring you a warning: your embrace of Marxist liberation theology. It is contrary to the Gospel, and you need, sir, to abandon it. And at that he dropped the handshake and made it clear that he was not in the mood to dialogue on that point."

Source: The Real Story Behind Rev. Wright's Controversial Black Liberation Theology Doctrine:,2933,354158,00.html

11 posted on 03/16/2010 5:22:34 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Actually, Hegel’s process was nothing new...Satan employed it with Eve. “You will not surely die, God knows if you eat of it you will also be like the gods knowing good from evil” Hegel had tapped into the very Satanic process from which men were destroyed!

12 posted on 03/16/2010 5:36:13 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish
"Huxley spoke of two opposing worldviews---one founded on supernatural creation and the other on atheist evolutionism"

What about the view that God is behind all natural processes, even evolution?

13 posted on 03/16/2010 5:39:16 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

The Hegelian dialectic is the perfect wedge tool for the Left because any subject can be rendered in terms of what it is and what it is not. Then a process can be implemented to empower the group that aligns with “what is not,” and a conflict is driven. Resolution of the conflict requires a synthesis between the opposites and a result that is neither fish nor fowl.
So race, gender, religion, abortion, wealth ... all can serve as subjects on which to divide this country. The authors of the conflict are the Left, but its abettors and enablers are the timid Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham.

It’s also germane to note that the antithetical process often requires no small measure of absurdity, a complete reversal of logic and common sense. How many of THOSE kinds of incidents have we seen? A prom in Mississippi canceled because some lesbian wants to bring her tuxedoed girlfriend. Soldiers brought up on charges for injuring the enemy. Border agents imprisoned for enforcing immigration laws. Exposers of ACORN corruption themselves brought up on criminal charges. Discrimination based on race advanced as a solution to the problem of racial discrimination. Anti-poverty programs that trap generation after generation in a cycle of dependency and poverty. Muslim history taught in public schools while the Ten Commandments are razed from our courtroom walls ...

Conservatives cannot simply hope the past preserves itself. We have to take action to protect the values and institutions that have defined us, against this absurd yet remorseless onslaught. We can start by electing doctrinaire conservatives to our polity. But if that fails, we may need to take to the streets ...

14 posted on 03/16/2010 5:43:16 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glide625

“The foundation and key strategy of the consensus process is the knowledge that all individuals have an inherent fear of being alienated from the group”

It works only when the individual thinks that he has been alienated from God. Many folks operate on acceptance from group think and are not strong enough spiritually to operate alone when needed. Granted the Bible says for Christians to also not’forsake the gathering together” but that is for mutual support and strengthening for the times when not all Christians in a given church or gathering could be together.

I remember recently a video report showig a girl from a local college campus criticizing the state AG for stating that only the state legislature could pass laws outlining the types of discriminatory practices banned on state campuses, the colleges could not enact those bans on their own. The girl stated “we’ll be laughed at in other states” as her reason as to why the AG’s policy should not be enforced. It didn’t occur to the girl that there might be others laughing at her already.

15 posted on 03/16/2010 5:53:35 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge
This ‘consensus process’ will not work on those with true faith....Catholic or our Protestant Brothers and Sisters...

I agree. What are neo-marxists going to do - station police outside churches to prevent us from entering?

16 posted on 03/16/2010 6:02:16 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Liberal vs. Conservative = The vision of man versus the nature of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


“What about the view that God is behind all natural processes, even evolution?”

Spirited: Discernment is a must on this issue. On one hand is supernatural creation which begins with specific acts of creation and then proceeds by way of a process of development under the control of the personal, rational Creator. Some people call this process of development ‘evolution.’

On the other hand there is atheist evolutionism based on the scientifically disproved notion that life and consciousness somehow emerged from nonlife.


17 posted on 03/16/2010 6:17:13 AM PDT by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Excellent post. I bet not 1 in 100 Americans understands dialetics, and how it is used constantly by the left elite to convert the USA into a socialist paradise.

18 posted on 03/16/2010 6:18:41 AM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Underlying Black Liberation Theology and all Liberation theology is atheism disguised behind pantheistic notions of ‘god-or-christ-consciousness’ or some such construct as that. Note that Liberation Theologists support evolutionism over creation in our schools. Creation is deemed ‘religion’ while ‘evolutionism’ is termed ‘science.’

19 posted on 03/16/2010 6:22:28 AM PDT by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

Fear of social ostracization, eh? Is it new?

John 9:20-22
20”We know he is our son,” the parents answered, “and we know he was born blind. 21But how he can see now, or who opened his eyes, we don’t know. Ask him. He is of age; he will speak for himself.” 22His parents said this because they were afraid of the Jews, for already the Jews had decided that anyone who acknowledged that Jesus was the Christ[a] would be put out of the synagogue.

20 posted on 03/16/2010 6:27:55 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson