Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans reading the Obamacare bill, LIVE ONLINE, right now...for 40 hours!
Click here to hear the live reading of the massive Obamacare bill ^

Posted on 03/17/2010 7:45:53 AM PDT by Gopher Broke

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Gopher Broke

Call the local offices of Congresscritters. They are still answering the phone.


41 posted on 03/17/2010 8:57:51 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Call the local offices of Congresscritters. They are still answering the phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

I am getting more and more ticked every day at the stupid people who voted this guy in. Just last week while driving on 95 in NY, a car passed me with a Kerry/Edwards bumber sticker. This person must be living on another planet. KERRY?EDWARDS???? No shame. How stupid and ignorant of the news can you be? This is the reason why we are where we are today. Pathetic.


42 posted on 03/17/2010 9:02:03 AM PDT by adc (Rush '12All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently oppos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

I am getting more and more ticked every day at the stupid people who voted this guy in. Just last week while driving on 95 in NY, a car passed me with a Kerry/Edwards bumber sticker. This person must be living on another planet. KERRY?EDWARDS???? No shame. How stupid and ignorant of the news can you be? This is the reason why we are where we are today. Pathetic.


43 posted on 03/17/2010 9:02:37 AM PDT by adc (Rush '12All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently oppos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo
My wife keeps responding, "They wouldn't do that!" when I tell her some of this crap.

The problem is that most people simply can't believe that someone would take over the country like this.

44 posted on 03/17/2010 9:08:19 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: adc
This person must be living on another planet. KERRY?EDWARDS???? No shame. How stupid and ignorant of the news can you be? This is the reason why we are where we are today. Pathetic.

I thought the cash for ckunkers program was supposed to have taken all of those bumper stickers off the road.

45 posted on 03/17/2010 9:10:09 AM PDT by Cowman (I'd like to eliminate stupidity in the world but this %$#@ conscience thing is in the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

lol


46 posted on 03/17/2010 9:12:04 AM PDT by adc (Rush '12All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently oppos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Damn you people. They couldn't have kept you supplied with enough ammo in Vietnam, fragging the people on the front lines like you do!

I don't see why the GOP even bothers with a "base" like us.

Damn me? I don't just sit behind a keyboard, shouting at fellow FReepers. That's not "activism".

My husband and I have marched on Washington to oppose ObamaCare, shouted, called, e-mailed, rallied the "troops" here on FR... we've done our part, much more than many others I know, who've been sitting on their lazy asses throughout this healthcare battle.

We helped out with the Scott Brown campaign (we're in Connecticut)... made calls, educated Massachusetts friends and family, drove through a blinding snow storm to stand out in 15 degree weather in 3-ft tall slushy snowbanks to rally for Scott Brown.

Of course all I get from many fellow FReepers about that now is that Scott Brown isn't a "pure" enough conservative. He's a RINO, and must go. Never mind that he was the 41st vote that was supposed to kill ObamaCare in the Senate. But I digress...

The PEOPLE (especially the Tea Partiers) are responsible for delaying the original ObamaCare bill, the GOP noticed, and THEN they followed suit.

If the Republicans think they can delay this current bill from becoming law by reading it, fine. I just hope they've got other tricks up their sleeves besides this if that doesn't work. There are too many "gentlemen" in the Republican Congress... I want to see more pit bulls.

47 posted on 03/17/2010 9:15:43 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We have to pass the bill first so you can find out what's in it." - Nancy Pelosi, March 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy; Gopher Broke

I meant to ping you to #47


48 posted on 03/17/2010 9:16:42 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We have to pass the bill first so you can find out what's in it." - Nancy Pelosi, March 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I'll probably get flamed for this, but I figure it's worth a shot. I mostly lurk anyway.

I've seen posts containing the same sentiment you have increase over the last few weeks, and I'm just not sure that I buy it.

When you look back at the choices that we had in 2006 and 2008 from today it's easy for anyone to say that 'none of this would've happened had the other guy got the nod'. But from where I'm sitting, I'm not so sure (see McCain's recent news on Amnesty). The truth is that we were given the choice between Socialism and Socialism-lite. I think anyone would agree that Socialism-lite is the lesser of two evils, but at what cost?

I'll refrain from bringing out the old slogans about the party leaving me, and instead preface my question like this. I have no doubt that some of what we see today could have been avoided had more Conservatives held their noses and voted for McCain. Do that many people on this site really believe that Socialism-lite is the best that the Republican Party could offer in 2008? I would hope (and I think I'd be right) that people around here aren't as attached to the party affiliation as they are to the content of the representative. If the Republicans keep putting weak Conservatives up for election, at what point do we, as Conservatives, send a message to the GOP and how do we send that message?
49 posted on 03/17/2010 9:25:06 AM PDT by fmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

I sent the link to all my libtard relatives and told them if they can explain it to me, then I will listen to anything they have to say. If not, they can shut their mouths and never talk to me again if they let this boondoggle pass and put it on my children and grandchildren.


50 posted on 03/17/2010 9:27:55 AM PDT by Wisconsinlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Well said. Those same “I’m taking my toys and going home!” babies have given us the mess we now find ourselves.


51 posted on 03/17/2010 9:30:51 AM PDT by publana (Obama, you will not intimidate me into not voicing my opinions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

Same folks would be bad-mouthing leadership if they just sat on their tails and did nothing. Go GOP! Make this painful.


52 posted on 03/17/2010 9:34:14 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX
Since congress refuses to recognize English as this nation's official language, the bill needs to be translated and read in multiple languages.

LOL - just like the government printing ballots in Spanish!!
53 posted on 03/17/2010 9:43:30 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

54 posted on 03/17/2010 9:45:57 AM PDT by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

My mother used to call me regularly in a panic, regurgitating whatever had been on the alphabet network news that night. I finally convinced her to watch Fox. I don’t get the panic calls any more. Now we have well-informed, well-reasoned conversations.


55 posted on 03/17/2010 10:41:53 AM PDT by kimmie7 (THE CROSS - Today, Tomorrow and Always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

Not a waste of time at all! Every delay possible is beneficial to try and force the House Dims to go back home for their two week Easter break to get hammered by their constituents before they have a chance to vote on this monstrosity.

A number of pundits believe that if no House vote can be held before the Dims go home for Easter break, the bill is dead.


56 posted on 03/17/2010 10:53:08 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from The Right Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
They’ve done this stunt before, and it didn’t result in much, other than a waste of time.

I think it is great that the House Repubs are doing this. ANYTHING that delays or hinders this 0bozoDebacle in any way, shape or form, is a positive in my book. I applaud the House Repubs for scratching under every rock to delay or stop it.

57 posted on 03/17/2010 11:10:18 AM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Obstruct. Subvert. Delay. Threaten. Psych out. Intimidate. Heel Drag. Object. Ridicule. Interrupt. Aikido throw. Call for Bathroom breaks and get Constipation. Run the Clock Down. Turn the furniture over in the Longworth HOB if necessary. Turn every Saul Alinsky tactic right back on thei asses. And finally, completely ROUT the Senate and House in 2010 in November. Deemocrats will have NO place to hide. The lousy so and so*s! This is nothing compared to what our heroes took on Normandy in 1944. And yet, THEY PRESSED ON.

Everything you said & more! I don't understand some FReepers who criticize Repub House & Senate for not doing enough to stop this monstrosity, and then others (perhaps the same criticizers) turn around and say that reading the bill is too late or a waste of time. Doggone it, I WANT IT TO BE A DELAYING TACTIC & WASTE OF TIME!!! Anything to stop, delay, hinder, etc, etc, etc, (everything you said above) is another step to hopefully defeating 0bozoCare for good.

58 posted on 03/17/2010 11:21:49 AM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

What about the ‘Slaughter rule’? Ol’ Nancy will pull that nasty rabbit out of her hat then, wouldn’t she? They seem to think they can do anything they want, legal or not!


59 posted on 03/17/2010 11:26:13 AM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Proud of Texas
"It was my understanding there was no final bill yet."

The dems have thoroughly muddied events to the point that possibly no one can actually state what's going on.

As I understand it;
There IS a bill, passed by the Senate and sent to the House. That's not "final" but it is complete and can be read (over a couple of days). "Final" means that both house and senate have passed the same bill and jointly reconciled any inadvertent conflict.
Such a bill would typically be reconciled in conference between the two chambers, be approved by both in that form, and go to the president for signature into law.
Instead, house dems are trying to craft a new and different bill, that would serve to alter the senate bill, to do so they have to assume the original senate bill is passed and ready for presidential sign off.
They can only unilaterally address changing it AFTER passage, which is accomplished by including words in the modification that "deem" the senate bill as being final. That way, the house does not vote on the actual senate version, only on their changes to an accomplished fact.
However, I believe that the senate would then have to approve the house modifications (without changes) in order to accomplish any sort of reconciliation.
If the senate refused to do so, we'd just see the senate bill sent to OBummer because the house had already deemed it to be passed.
If the senate concurred with the modifications, and voted it passed, we'd see both the original (senate) bill and an even more liberal and costly modification on the pres's desk top...in about an hour.
(I assume that the Great One could sign the first and veto the second if he chose to do so.)

What's wrong with this?
Nothing becomes law after being passed by only one of the two chambers, house is approving the senate bill by fiat and in hopes that the senate will do the same as a nod to reconciliation.
"Deeming" something as passed has been used as a tool in the past, there is precedent. But I think that past use has been limited to means of making the financials work and not as a way to change the substance of the bill.
Reference to a 72 hour cooling off period is an innocent whiff of nostalgia going back to the 2009 campaign - they'll vote this bast%@d as soon as Nan believes she has the votes locked up.
And she WILL get the votes locked up.

Since the dems have already convinced some portion of the electorate that "this bill" (or "My proposal" according to the Great One) has been "the most debated bill ever..." they will start the next day on reminding people that they did achieve reconciliation and everything is OK.

Pray for a constitutional challenge.

(Sorry if I bored too many readers but I kind of wanted to see my thoughts in black and white: you are invited to set me straight if I've gone awry.)

60 posted on 03/17/2010 12:10:03 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson