I will use the same exemption code as these "senior staffers" who drafted the bill.
What evil overlords, devils, crooks and thugs ..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“But as with a lot of legislative matters, the devil is in the details or in this case, the definitions. As anyone whos worked on Capitol Hill knows, the personal office staff for a member is governed by different rules than those who work on committees and in the leadership offices.
It appears from the way this language is written that those staffers NOT in personal offices, such as those working and paid under the committee structure (such as those working for Chairman Henry Waxman) or those working on leadership staff (such as those working for Speaker Nancy Pelosi) would be exempt from these requirements (emphasis added).
(ii) DEFINITIONS- In this section:
(I) MEMBER OF CONGRESS- The term `Member of Congress means any member of the House of Representatives or the Senate.
(II) CONGRESSIONAL STAFF- The term `congressional staff means all full-time and part-time employees employed by the official office of a Member of Congress, whether in Washington, DC or outside of Washington, DC.
According to the Congressional Research Service, this definition of staff will only apply to those staffers employed within a members personal office meaning that it will absolutely not apply to committee staff members, and may not apply to leadership staff.
This problem was acknowledged earlier in the process last year, Senator Grassley tried to repair it, but he was rebuffed.
As Speaker Pelosi said a few weeks ago, its only after this legislation is passed that well truly find out whats in it.”
~ ~ ~
Their arrogance and power mongering know no depths.