Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scanner nabs unregistered cars, crooks (CT)
WTNH Television ^ | 3/31/10 | Puppage

Posted on 03/31/2010 10:28:28 AM PDT by Puppage

Branford, Conn. (WTNH) - When it comes to fighting crime police will use any tool they can get their hands on. In Branford , they've equipped one of their cars with cameras that act almost like a set of eyes in the back of officer's heads.

The electronic eyes are specifically designed to read and remember license plates. They are Branford's newest tools for proactive policing.

"Our database is updated every day with the Dept. of Motor Vehicle registration files, so this gives the officer an indication that a vehicle may not be registered properly," Lt. Geoff Morgan, Branford olice, said.

But that is only the beginning because police have noticed a trend. This kind of information doesn't just help cops find people who haven't been to the DMV. It helps them catch criminals.

"Many people that are involved in other types of criminal activity in our community are operating and manuevering in cars that are not properly registered, not properly insured, nor do they have proper licensing," Lt. Morgan said.

To show how the system works, Branford Police took News Channel 8 for a ride both on the streets and through the Walmart parking lot. The thing was beeping like crazy, picking up license plates literally left and right. Most of them come back clean -- no problems. But once and a while there's a hit.

Police can program the system to look for specific plates -- think Amber Alerts or vehicle descriptions from crime scenes. In fact, just last week they caught a suspected shoplifter after a store employees could offer only a partial license plate of the getaway car.

"Because the license plate reader had been through that parking lot moments before, we were able to search that database, come up with the actual registration and actually solve a crime," Lt. Morgan said.

Federal stimulus money essentially paid for these cameras, and at this point only one patrol car equipped with them, but they're working pretty well and Branford police haven't ruled out getting more down the road.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: beseeingyou; donutwatch; guiltyuntilinnocent; lazypoliceman; papersplease; policestate; revenuetickets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Not sure how I feel about this. To much Big Brother? FReeper thoughts?
1 posted on 03/31/2010 10:28:29 AM PDT by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Puppage

I am told these systems cost 20k each & this one was purchased with Federal Stimulus money.


2 posted on 03/31/2010 10:29:16 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

I believe that California has been trying this idea for some time. I don’t have a problem with it if it us used strictly to locate criminals. That being said, it could be used for other things also..........hopefully not.


3 posted on 03/31/2010 10:30:50 AM PDT by RC2 (Keep ACORN investigations going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2
I don’t have a problem with it if it us used strictly to locate criminals. That being said, it could be used for other things also

And, therein lies the problem.

4 posted on 03/31/2010 10:33:48 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

“And actually solved a crime!”

Oh boy.. we’re in trouble.

I have no problem with this, until it’s abuse is evident. Because basically it just enhances the senses of the officer. It’s on a car, and not on a pole. It empowers LEO to do their jobs far better.

If it were just mounted on poles, then we have problems. Now at least they’ll stop pulling over my 1984 Brat for no other reason than “It looks suspicious”.

What kinda upsets me here is that CT required all motorists to turn in their old “White on Blue” plates in favor of the new pressings of the Light House plate. This plate is what enables all of these technologies to work. This is the same tech that city officers use to scan licence plates to see who has or hasn’t paid their taxes - then clamp cars appropriately.


5 posted on 03/31/2010 10:33:52 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Thank goodness they are able to crack down on unregistered cars driven by college kids waiting for a summer paycheck, or a parent who put it off for a few months to save up for a new baby crib.

It’s also good to know that there are no other crimes being committed in Connecticut that need law enforcement attention.


6 posted on 03/31/2010 10:33:54 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Now can we forget about that old rum-runner Joe Kennedy and his progeny of philandering drunks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Proactive policing? No thanks.

We already have these things in NY and have for some time. I find it very intrusive. The good news is that they put out so much Ka radar that you can detect them like 5 blocks away with a decent radar detector.


7 posted on 03/31/2010 10:34:14 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

It can be abused (such as by cruising parking lots only of businesses that don’t support the Sheriff’s reelection campaign, or neighborhoods where a particular disfavored demographic predominates).

The database of who went where, for later crime solving (keeping tabs on citizens’ movements) is improper. But I’m less concerned about marked patrol vehicles scanning plates, just like the cops scan for expired or missing registration stickers.

I do support measure to stop unregistered vehicles, and uninsured drivers. That would be especially helpful where illegal aliens predominate, but I’d support the efforts only if they actually used them for immigration enforcement when they found violations.


8 posted on 03/31/2010 10:34:26 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Anything worth doing, is worth doing badly at first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

As long as the manufacturer of the system paid an appropriate and mutually-acceptable bribe to the Congresscritter who wrote the precise specifications into the appropriation bill such that only that mfr’s offering would comply, then I don’t see anything to object to.


9 posted on 03/31/2010 10:35:00 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Voters who thought their ship came in with 0bama are on their own Titanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC2
I believe that California has been trying this idea for some time.

Not at the state level. However I have no idea about small localities in far flung corners of the state.

10 posted on 03/31/2010 10:35:04 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Now can we forget about that old rum-runner Joe Kennedy and his progeny of philandering drunks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Guess I picked the wrong day to wash the car...;)

Of course this sounds OK on the surface with the “Hey, go ahead and search me-I have nothing to hide” Set....


11 posted on 03/31/2010 10:35:10 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
In fact, just last week they caught a suspected shoplifter after a store employees could offer only a partial license plate of the getaway car. "Because the license plate reader had been through that parking lot moments before, we were able to search that database, come up with the actual registration and actually solve a crime," Lt. Morgan said.

Suspected shoplifter doesn't sound like the trial has completed to conviction yet. "solve a crime" is more than just getting it off the books. Ask those who were wrongly accused of being the Olympic Park Bomber and the Anthrax Letter mailer.

12 posted on 03/31/2010 10:35:21 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Just sounds like more of a money-making scheme to me. If they would stop using it for that and use it for actual crimes, like they said Amber Alerts, then I’d be all for it.


13 posted on 03/31/2010 10:36:19 AM PDT by wastedyears (The essence of training is to allow error without consequence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2
I do have a problem. First it's reading the license tags of innocent citizens and running them without probable cause. What is the justification for that? If I am driving my car legally and not breaking any laws why would my tag be run? I vote a big old NO on this.
14 posted on 03/31/2010 10:36:26 AM PDT by pepperdog (As Israel goes, so goes America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
"Because the license plate reader had been through that parking lot moments before, we were able to search that database, come up with the actual registration and actually solve a crime," Lt. Morgan said.

How long before someone tries to subpoena these databases for a civil trial like a divorce?

15 posted on 03/31/2010 10:36:33 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Now can we forget about that old rum-runner Joe Kennedy and his progeny of philandering drunks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Ah, the good old days when I drove the rusty old Chevy pickup with no plates for months and was never pulled over.


16 posted on 03/31/2010 10:36:47 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

It’s very double plus ungood.


17 posted on 03/31/2010 10:37:06 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners, no mercy. 2010 is here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celerity

The Brat is like an old predecessor to the Baja.


18 posted on 03/31/2010 10:37:53 AM PDT by wastedyears (The essence of training is to allow error without consequence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Federal stimulus money essentially paid for these cameras...

Well whoever was pushing for this government contract got stimulated.

19 posted on 03/31/2010 10:38:01 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

If LEOs put out a BOLO on someone seen in a specific vehicle then yes, it makes sense but the limits on it have to be clear.


20 posted on 03/31/2010 10:38:27 AM PDT by misterrob (Have you tea bagged a liberal today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson