Elect more nonconforming libertarian-Republicans

Renew America ^ | 2010-04-03 | Bonnie Alba

[jenk]

nuts

[La Enchiladita]

Of course, it was a hit and run.
Rabster has “moved on.”

They only attack, because they can’t DEFEND.

[ohioWfan]

What??? You don't think that calling me a "Bushbot" was a defense of conservative principles?

I'm shocked, I tell ya. Shocked! ;*)

[La Enchiladita]

Nope, I think it’s “one toke over the line.”

[SoCalPol]

The McCain Mutiny: A maverick fights for his political life—and his soul
Newsweek ^ | 2010-04-03 | David Margolick

Posted on Saturday, April 03, 2010 3:58:32 PM by rabscuttle385

rabAdash routine is to post a thread and while his cult leader is being exposed he posts another Thread and so it goes.

The BoyToy for the PaulBots life is to spread anti war
and fringe propaganda

[jenk]

a bunch of intercine muslim religious nutcases who were doing a pretty good job of offing themselves and who could care less about freedom to begin with.

that's the other thing about Paul followers, they are decidedly non-compassionate and borderline racist.

[onyx]

It’s not infighting in their view. Ron Paul is a RINO:
Republican In Name Only.

Dump him. He is actually a cranky Bircher.
The coward should be forced to run under the Libertarian party.

[onyx]

LOL. I have moved to the new thread.

[mkjessup]

“One thing I know for sure though, rab, son. YOU are not a Christian conservative.”

One thing *I* know for sure, and that is that Almighty God alone knows what is in each person's heart. One day when his mortal journey is over, Rabs will stand before King Jesus, and King Jesus alone, not any one of us.

Happy Easter.

[RaceBannon]

that many of his followers are 9/11 truthers is undisputed

that many of his followers are UFO believers is undisputed

that Ron Paul endorsed a TRAITOR Adam Kokesh is undisputed

so, next time, read.

[ohioWfan]

I actually have greater doubts about the conservative part, mk.

I make no pretense at judging the poor boy's soul. I pray he knows the Lord.

[Repeal The 17th]

[ohioWfan]

btw, my daughter, who is roughly your age is not, like you are, sitting in her parents' basement calling people names and thinking that's making a difference in the world.

She's overseas freeing slaves.

I'll never call you "daughter" either. It's far too great a compliment for your very bad behavior.

[ohioWfan]

Literally, or figuratively? :)

[mkjessup]

I actually have greater doubts about the conservative part, mk.

Well it has been my observation for a while now that it doesn't matter what the article is, or what the post is about, if Rabs makes it, it inevitably becomes not a discussion on whatever it is he has to say, but it becomes a referendum on Rabs. That's my take on it anyway. Rabs' disdain for Juan McAmnesty knows no bounds, and apparently he is in good company because JimRob despises McCain like a Baptist hates original sin, and I think that's a good thing. I don't agree with Rabs on every issue, in fact I don't agree with everyone on every issue and I doubt that anyone does. But let's consider a hypothetical question in light of Rabs favorable outlook regarding Ron Paul:

IF, through some crazy twist of fate, Ron Paul ended up being the GOP nominee in 2012, and actually went on the warpath against 0bama, making a pretty good showing for himself, how many of us would pull the lever for the GOP ticket?

I make no pretense at judging the poor boy's soul. I pray he knows the Lord.

C'mon now, "poor boy"? That isn't necessary is it?

Based on my own conversations with Rabs, I think he is on pretty sound spiritual footing, and if he chooses to let his religious beliefs become a topic of discussion, that is entirely up to him.

Happy Easter to you and yours.

[ohioWfan]

Oh........forgot to say HAPPY EASTER to you too.

Have a Blessed Resurrection Day tomorrow!

[freedom_forge]

The left’s attack on America continues, libertarianism and liberalism of the last 70 plus years is what got us here. The Earl Warren court created many “libertarian” victories that we will never recover from.

Amazing.

I guess none of you libertarian bashers agree with anything Milton Friedman, Tom Sowell, Walter Williams or the Cato Institute has written in 70 years. Something tells me that few of you have the slightest idea of what you are talking about and are more interested in driving a wedge into the conservative movement than getting rid of the Marxist in Chief. Perfect! Just what we need now.

I know I'll just be inciting flames from you but, for the record, "libertarian" is a very loosely defined word and includes people who are fundamentalist Christians, pro-lifers and pro-national defense individuals as well as people who are really Marxists who hide behind the libertarian label just like they used to hide behind the liberal label.

The movement grew, in large part, out of the Goldwater campaign but more influenced by Ayn Rand than Bill Buckley. Although, Rand despised libertarians because of their hodgepodge melding of philosophies that included Christians, old-guard conservatives, anarchists etc. The only thing they had in common was the goal of reducing the size of government. In dispute was merely the amount of reduction.

That there are crack-pots or strays, such as Paul, has nothing to do with the fact that there are also people indistinguishable from Christian Conservatives. But, perhaps those of you who insist that only Christians may call themselves conservative may want to put a finer point on it and pick a denomination. Perhaps Papists and Presbyterians should not apply.

I suggest we can fight with each other after we throw out the Marxists, not before. But maybe your real goal is to let the Marxists win. At least that will be the result of your indiscriminate vitriol.

You people dissapoint me more than Obama voters do. At least they have an excuse. They are mind-numbed-drones.

[mkjessup]

Thank you very much, and not wanting to seem too irreverent on the most Reverent date in our Christian faith, I did hear an amusing story perhaps you might get a chuckle out of...

A Sunday School teacher says to his class of kids, “Now before we celebrate Easter, we observe Good Friday, can anyone tell us WHY we call it ‘Good Friday’?

Little Johnny (who else? lol) says “I dunno teach, it wasn’t very good for Jesus, they went and KILLED him!”

The teacher said “That is very true Johnny, but when Jesus gave His Life for us, it meant that He took on the suffering for our sins, for YOUR sins, so that we wouldn’t have to suffer for them ourselves...”

Johnny: “I guess my Dad didn’t get the memo, he beat my tail last night!”

Again, Happy Easter. ;)

[ohioWfan]

I was discussing the issue and the thread until rabs busted in for the sole purpose of insulting me. He's done that multiple times on multiple threads, and at one time was quite vulgar in his insult (no.....VERY vulgar).

I have NO respect for him any more whatsoever, and that is based entirely on his very bad behavior on this forum. ALWAYS unprovoked on my part.

He has obviously done that to others, and therefore, IMO, deserves what he gets. He has an MO that is unpleasant, and notably UNconservative.

As I said, I'm not judging his soul. I just don't believe he's either a conservative, or a person of courage and character.

And HE will have to change that opinion by changing his behavior, and though I appreciate your effort to defend him, he needs to learn to be his own man.

[ohioWfan]

LOL! Love the story!