Posted on 04/24/2010 6:36:14 PM PDT by Touch Not the Cat
HAUNTED by the memory of a lost opportunity to kill Osama Bin Laden before he attacked the World Trade Center in New York, US military planners have won President Barack Obama’s support for a new generation of high-speed weapons that are intended to strike anywhere on Earth within an hour.
Obama’s interest in Prompt Global Strike (PGS), a nonnuclear weapons programme, has alarmed China and Russia and complicated nuclear arms reduction negotiations.
White House officials confirmed last week that the president, who won the Nobel peace prize last year, is considering the deployment of a new class of hypersonic guided missiles that can reach their targets at speeds of Mach 5 — about 3,600mph.
That is nearly seven times faster than the 550mph Tomahawk cruise missiles that arrived too late to kill Bin Laden at an Al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan in 1998.
“The ability to attack a wide range of targets at intercontinental range, promptly and without resort to nuclear weapons, is of central importance to US national security,” said Daniel Goure, a defence analyst at the Lexington Institute in Virginia.
The new weapon could be launched from air, land or sea on a long-range missile travelling at suborbital altitudes above 350,000ft. The missile releases a hypersonic pilotless plane that receives updates from satellites as it homes in on its target at up to five times the speed of sound, generating so much heat that it has to be shielded with special materials to avoid melting.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
He's dead, Jim.
“Is this similar to this one that the Russians and Indians have been working on:”
Yes.
But physics is physics and they are fighting the same challenges the US or anyone else is. I’m not saying it’s impossible, it’s just one of those programs that will take an enormous effort to ever get it working. So far the funding and interest hasn’t been there.
For example, what will the airframe be made out of? The speeds we are talking about here are way more than an SR-71 ever flew, for example. You have to make an airframe that can sustain hundreds of degrees for an extended period of time. That means hotspots will be 1000+ degrees, and internal temps can be impossible to keep electronic and other components from melting down.
That just scratches the surface of the issues involved in getting a 5,000 mph missile operational. I’m interested to see if it ever comes aobut.
“You’re right. It’s a delivery system. “
It could be a delivery system but that doesn’t solve the problems with developing a 5,000 mph missile.
The CNN anchors were cooing over this thing just the other day. I think the announcement is another Obama head fake, timed to offset public unease about our nuclear disarmament. CNN’s talking point was that it could hit Osama’s hiding place in Afghanistan, a notion that the Dems have been cynically peddling for a while now in place of a real, muscular commitment to fighting terror. This is just an extension of that.
“I think the announcement is another Obama head fake, timed to offset public unease about our nuclear disarmament. “
That makes sense.
This has as much chance of being deployed, as U.S. Citizens have of stepping on the Moon or a planet before 2100, if Obama gets his way.
Nope, even at orbital velocity (18,000 MPH) it still takes 90 minutes to go around the earth.
An ICBM traveling at near-orbital velocity may be in flight for 30 minutes, but it only makes it about 5-6000 miles distance, maybe a quarter of the way around the earth, in that time. There's also the ascent and descent time to figure in...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.