Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Congressional Republicans avoid the Obama Eligibility Issue
The Post & Email ^ | 5/2/2010 | John F. Sweeney

Posted on 05/02/2010 10:06:04 AM PDT by Menehune56

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last
To: Las Vegas Ron

As I posted before: They made a deal.

If John McCain had won the election we’d have the same issue... as he was also born on foreign soil in a civilian hospital in Colon, Panama and fails the Constitutional requirement of natural born citizenship. It was so nice to hear pundits and media bring up this fact /lol. The “born on a military hospital” is PSYOPS fantasy.

What’s VERY interesting is that in early 2008 the 3 candidates were already conniving with each other.

February 28 Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) with co-sponsers Barry n Hillary in background attempted Bill S. 2678 Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, to change requirements on the Constitution’s natural born citizenship provision to no avail.

One month later McCaskill is back again w/co-sponsers Barry and Hillary for Resolution 511 declaring John McCain eligible as “both parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth...”

So

— never minding the fact this bill is toilet paper and Barry didn’t even qualify said criteria —

WHY were there TWO Senators co-sponsoring such an issue, TWICE, WHO were in direct COMPETITION with John McCain in the 2008 election?

Funny how Hillary get’s Sec of State. See how blackmail works?

And if McCain had won..what would have Hillary gotten? The one with nothing to lose...

And of course we’ve heard the McCain camp declare “we’ve looked into Barry’s NBC issue, nothing to find”..riiight.

Usually the question comes up, well if such and such (opposing) campaign and management had this dirt on such and such candidate, why wasn’t it brought up?? Because the whole house of cards would fall.

Everybody’s dirty.


61 posted on 05/02/2010 3:35:00 PM PDT by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

I don’t accept the premise. It was not a foregone conclusion that Obama was going to win (or Hillary or Johnny either). That’s just plain silly.


62 posted on 05/02/2010 3:40:06 PM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
“I don’t accept the premise. It was not a foregone conclusion that Obama was going to win (or Hillary or Johnny either). That’s just plain silly.”

I agree. It's not like this was 1984 where everyone knew Mondale was doomed, to the extent that even conservatives almost felt a twinge of pity for his trudging on to the inevitable (although choosing Grandpa Munster makeup for his last debate with Reagan remains relatively inexplicable—maybe he just finally cracked).

McCain clearly lost, but it was not a total rout. One can imagine a better run campaign, or a few select events playing out slightly differently, getting him over the top.

63 posted on 05/02/2010 4:04:14 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PackerBoy
Star Traveler is a well know troll who journeys here from the Obot Universe to haunt threads concerned with Obama’s birth certificate and the meaning of natural born for the purpose of spreading misinformation. Star’s specialty is long monotonous posts containing partial truths that clutter up a thread with confusion and are rife with an irritating number of LOL’s and doncha knows. Star is regularly kicked off “birther” threads by mods and has been warned by the site owner as well.

Star Traveler has a number of fellow travelers who show up in force if a thread gets legs - there are dozens and dozens of examples of it on this site. This happens because Obama and his handlers really don’t want the birth certificate issue to go mainstream. It’s a gotcha item and they know it.

Now, to correcting the information about John McCain and eligibility. The president must be a natural born citizen.

A natural born citizen is easy to define:

1. Both parents have to be American citizens.
2. Must be born on U.S. soil.

John McCain meets the #1 requirement but not #2. McCain was born in a hospital in Colon, Panama. Panama was not U.S. territory and the hospital was NOT on a U.S. military base. Seems unfair, but it is the truth.

The fact that both McCain and Obama were ineligible to hold office is thought by many to be something other than a coincidence.

It gets very tiresome having to go over the same ground because trolls like Star Traveler provide devious falsehoods so I’m not going to provide a collection of links to you nor any backup for what is stated above. However, if you are interested in having links and backup for everything I have stated here, please respond and I will send you that information via FReepmail.

Alternatively, most of what I have said can be verified by reading this recent thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2504335/posts

64 posted on 05/02/2010 4:24:11 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54

“John McCain meets the #1 requirement but not #2. McCain was born in a hospital in Colon, Panama. Panama was not U.S. territory and the hospital was NOT on a U.S. military base. Seems unfair, but it is the truth.”

Uh, no, it’s actually nut house stuff that removes one from serious conversation.


65 posted on 05/02/2010 4:31:44 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

Is that you, tired_old_liberal?


66 posted on 05/02/2010 4:59:22 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54

“Is that you, tired_old_liberal?”

No, it’s just a sane person.


67 posted on 05/02/2010 5:03:40 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

People with inquiring minds don’t suffer from tunnel vision.


68 posted on 05/02/2010 5:03:46 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

Sane - probably. Wrong - definitely.


69 posted on 05/02/2010 5:32:05 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader

“I have read repeatedly that Natural Born Citizen applies when both parents are citizens”

Read Vattel’s Law of Nations” the legal treatise the founder’s used in writing the Constitution and actually referenced in the Consititution. Natural Born Citizen is defined as someone born in the country by 2 parent citizen’s of that country. “Law of Nations” was the book which was recently discovered that George Washington had not returned to the New York library. McCain and Obama should have both been ineligible, regardless of where the Kenyan was born his father was a British subject.


70 posted on 05/02/2010 6:21:06 PM PDT by Bizhvywt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

bump


71 posted on 05/02/2010 6:22:52 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift; LucyT; BP2; rxsid

gnip


72 posted on 05/02/2010 6:23:50 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danamco
yep it's here, it just can't stay away, maybe we need the spray but this might work too...


73 posted on 05/02/2010 6:49:38 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
I agree. One of the stupidist political analyses I have ever glanced at. It’s even too stupid for the Stupid Party to espouse.

It's stupid, super-sized.

74 posted on 05/02/2010 9:36:51 PM PDT by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers; Menehune56
I called Obama far worse that ineligible during the election.

But you certainly have been and are still rooting for him here!!!

75 posted on 05/02/2010 10:23:14 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative
Uh, no, it’s actually nut house stuff that removes one from serious conversation.

So why do you continue to butt or break into the "nut house"???

Nobody here are preventing you from going back to DU where you again may feel more welcome and comfortable. And we won't miss you either!!!

76 posted on 05/02/2010 10:47:20 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: danamco

So, just for the record, you are stating that you support the proposition that McCain is not a natural born citizen? Because that is what I was objecting to, and that is complete nut house stuff. There’s no need to single me out, either, as multiple other people on this thread found it equally ludicrous.


77 posted on 05/02/2010 11:16:16 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
Idiot article.

McCain was totally eligible, having been born to two American citizens, one a naval officer, no less.

Obama was totally eligible, having been born in Honolulu. He's totally eligible in fact and law, just not in his own mind.

78 posted on 05/02/2010 11:30:50 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
I don't buy this theory. Why not run a stronger candidate and uphold the Constitution at the same time? Or, since McCain was challenged on his eligibility, why not turn the tables on BHO and demand the same authentication?

Tho' it may be painful to admit it, the GOP turned their backs on the Founding Fathers here, no question; they didn't even try.

I keep getting GOP "surveys" soliciting for cash. I respond with a promise for big bucks IF they redeem themselves and press for resolution of BHO's eligibility BEFORE NOV 2010.

Do you have proper Tea Party attire?:


79 posted on 05/03/2010 12:12:22 AM PDT by TexasVoter (No Constituion - No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson