Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bennett’s Loss in Utah a ‘Damn Outrage,’ ‘Non-Violent Coup,’ Part of Larger Intolerant GOP...
Newsbusters ^

Posted on 05/09/2010 12:31:19 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Over on Fox News Sunday, NPR’s Juan Williams expressed exasperation: “This is evidence of how the American political center is losing, on the right wing of the party a guy like Bob Bennett, who is a right-wing conservative, is being driven out because he’s not sufficiently conservative?”

If he voted for TARP and Obamacare he's not a conservative at all...at best he's a RINO.

41 posted on 05/09/2010 12:50:13 PM PDT by highlander_UW (First we take down the Democrats, then we clean the Augean stable that is the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Good on ya Jim!!

Wake Up America!


42 posted on 05/09/2010 12:51:32 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Brooks is entitled to his beliefs, and he should try to accurately state his beliefs when asked (which I think he does). However, he is no conservative. How would you have to define “conservative” to include Brooks’s views. “NYT liberal” comes to mind; and if that’s the definition of “conservative,” there is no sense in having such a word and no reason to have conservatives.


43 posted on 05/09/2010 12:51:50 PM PDT by olrtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
I agree with Juan Williams in this instance.

I'm surprised at you, m’lady.
You are usually spot on. Not in this instance though. TARP never saves anybody from no depression. Juan Williams doesn't know what he's talking about, as usual.

44 posted on 05/09/2010 12:51:55 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ops33
Trying to figure out what this means, what’s outrageous? Free elections, the right of the people to chose their representatives, democracy in action? What exactly is the outrage?

Couldn't have said it better. I am scratching my head here. For Libs (however they label themselves), anything that happens that they don't like -- especially when someone, most anyone, is held accountable by those to whom they are accountable -- is (1) "unfair" and (2) an "outrage."

45 posted on 05/09/2010 12:52:17 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Is it okay to wear an American flag t-shirt in America on Jamhuri (Kenyan Independence) Day?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

TARP was a scam and don’t give me that nonsense about paying the money back. With what, other bailout money? Phony ‘profits’ from cooking their books and lying about the value of their ‘assets’?

$700B down a rathole saving failed institutions so we could kick the can down the road and pretend that our zombie economy is ‘saved’?? Complete hogwash. Totally unnecessary.

If the feds were going to pony up dough for anything, it should have been to cover FDIC insurance on the failed banks and let the big banks FAIL. WTF is the FDIC even there for if not to do just that??!?!

And with the 700B down the hole, 150+ banks failed last year and another 60+ so far this year. So, $700B bought us a slow bleed instead of a clearing of the system. Woo hoo. Let’s all stare blankly at CNBC and look at the pretend ‘green shoots’!

Propping up failed businesses, whether they are car companies or banks, is a destructive distortion of the system, rewarding failure and penalizing success.

That may be the kind of crony-capitalist utopia that you and Juan Williams want to live in, but I’ll pass.


46 posted on 05/09/2010 12:52:27 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It’s a damn outrage that soft conservatives like Bennet have been allowed to continue representing deep red states. Utah should replace Hatch next. All the Red states need to clean house. We don’t want to get more government programs we don’t want mote bailouts we don’t want more spending we are damn outraged by it and rightly do! These people in power act as though the economy didn’t collasp they act as though they and their big money dinars had nothing to do with it they act as though we should applaud them fir trying to get things done that we don’t want done! David Brooks can look at this battle as a battle to claim the stays quo we are Americans and we want to reclaim our constitutional heritage and stop the train driven by senile old men and hedonistic socialists and plot a route back to greatness. We do not believe liberalism social and fiscal is inevitable we don’t believe change is good regardless of result we don’t believe America’s best days are behind us we believe they are ahead of us and we will fight to take down anyone who stands in our way in pursuit of that goal.


47 posted on 05/09/2010 12:52:58 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Tyranny thrives when the people are silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The howlers are going to howl as the governments get downsized (or worse). Look at Greece and watch the dominoes.


48 posted on 05/09/2010 12:53:01 PM PDT by Need4Truth (the just shall live by faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Xactly. The bailout wasn't a dem policy. It was Bush and it worked as intended, and was vital to the country. The current populist war against in inside the right is stupid.

We tried it there way letting Lehman fail messy and it blew up. They don't want to admit their policy preference is unrealistic and unworkable in the real world.

On the rest of it, there is no right to office, no tenure, in a republic, and tough toenails for the former senator.

49 posted on 05/09/2010 12:53:03 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lawdvd

“Brooks - “he’s losing his career over that. And it’s just a damn outrage.” Career? This is the exact mindset that conservatives have been fighting. It’s not “his” seat. Bennett served at the pleasure of his constituents and no longer had their backing.”

Exactly. ‘Politician’ in the USA was not meant to be a ‘career’. And we’ve seen what doing so has got us, most of the time...Ted Kennedy, John McCain, et al. I’m conflicted over term limits, but we’ve got to try something. If the person is a good public servant he can always run for another office.


50 posted on 05/09/2010 12:53:03 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Ironic isn’t it? Short memories.......


51 posted on 05/09/2010 12:53:21 PM PDT by Sub-Driver (Proud member of the Republican wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Competition clutch

A FINE BROMANCE
Tune: “A Fine Romance”
http://wtv-zone.com/REMEMBERTHEN/midis21/a-fine-romance.mid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVkoLBc-cuA&feature=related
As sung by David Brooks to Barack Obama

A fine bromance, like no other
A fine bromance, my Brooks brother
Barack and Brooks—it’s mutual admiration
Your rock-star looks are causin’ a strange sensation
A fine bromance, though you’re frazzled
A fine bromance, I’m bedazzled
I like to stare at the crease in your well-pressed pants
I’ve widened up my stance
This is a fine bromance

A fine bromance, we’re pie-chartin’
You make bromance that’s bi-partisan
You’re cooler than the clams that are down in the seaweed
You cast a glance my way and I get all wee-weed
A fine bromance, you’re my Marx guy
When we slow-dance, you make sparks fly
You make me have to cancel my “No we cant’s”
You’ve got me in a trance
This is a fine bromance

A fine bromance, with no disses
A fine bromance, Barack, this is
The “right” may be the box that a guy like I’m in
But I’m the kind that writes for the New York Times in
A fine bromance, my dear comrade
A fine bromance, like you and Rahm had
I feel a tingle running now up my pants
I’ve widened up my stance
This is a fine bromance


52 posted on 05/09/2010 12:53:25 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (The wag tailoring the doggerel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Yes, indeed, it’s time to stop the spending.

I have no argument with people voting Senator Bennett out of office — none whatsoever.

But when I read another article where a person claimed TARP as their sole reason for doing so, I just shook my head.


53 posted on 05/09/2010 12:53:43 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It is the people’s Senate seat. The people will determine who sits in it.


54 posted on 05/09/2010 12:53:49 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Do u really believe TARP and the bailouts of Fannie and Freddie, saved us from a depression? I think TARP guarantees a future depression much worst than anything we were facing in 2008 because it saved the corrupt politicians and corporations that caused the meltdown.

Now we’ve got the same villians operating the same schemes with a proven guarantee: that most people, including conservatives like yourself believe the government is acting properly when it gives thieves trillions of dollars it confiscates from honest hard working people.


55 posted on 05/09/2010 12:54:37 PM PDT by NotSoModerate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: behzinlea

All TARP did was delay the collapse and guarantee that it will be orders of magnitude GREATER when it DOES happen.

Exactly, huge profits come with risk. We’ve taken the risk away.


56 posted on 05/09/2010 12:54:51 PM PDT by freedomfiter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: maddogconservative

I will be happy if we can just get rid of Senators Lugar and McCain.


57 posted on 05/09/2010 12:55:04 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
Horsefeathers. The banks have repaid practically everything lent to them. The whole thing didn't cost $700 billion, it might cost a 10th of that and it might cost nothing if you count the profits made on emergency actions, include the Fed, etc.

Nothing is down a rathole but your rhetoric.

You don't like the fact that it worked, that doesn't mean it didn't. It didn't cost you a dime, but you hate the fact that it benefitted men you didn't want to see benefitted - tough toenails.

God how you knuckledragging finance haters steam me. You aren't conservatives at all, you are radical ideologues and you belong in your own communist party, not in mine.

58 posted on 05/09/2010 12:56:28 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Over on Fox News Sunday, NPR’s Juan Williams expressed exasperation:

It’s always a good thing when Juan Williams doesn’t sgree with something the GOP is doing. It usuallu means the GOP is doing somethimg right.

This is evidence of how the American political center is losing, on the right wing of the party a guy like Bob Bennett, who is a right-wing conservative, is being driven out because he’s not sufficiently conservative?”

The Democrats have been taken over by the extreme left long ago, culminating in their chosing the most left wing candidate in American history as their candidate in 2008.

59 posted on 05/09/2010 12:56:30 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“ . . . almost a non-violent coup because they denied
the sitting Senator even a chance of getting on the
primary ballot.”

You remember how it works. You don't let Republicans into
meetings of the various committees, you don't take any
Republic ideas, and then you call it bipartisan.

60 posted on 05/09/2010 12:56:44 PM PDT by righttackle44 (Is Obama an Irish, Italian or Japanese name?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson