Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Anything that doesn't strictly conform to the the Constitution is by definition an "unlawful" law.

Which is why we need the Amendment to protect the existence of those who aren't born yet. There is currently nothing in the Constitution that gives any protection to the unborn.

Period.

Your heart may be in the right place, but your head is out to lunch on trying to redefine "person".

111 posted on 05/20/2010 11:49:49 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
There is currently nothing in the Constitution that gives any protection to the unborn.

You can only say that if you do what Blackmun did: refuse to recognize the personhood of the child in the womb.

Conversely, if you admit the obvious, that the child in the womb is a human person, the Constitution's clear words protect them. Even Blackmun admitted this.

113 posted on 05/20/2010 11:56:42 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (There is no right to do wrong. Those who claim there is destroy the foundations of true liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson