Skip to comments.U.S. Selective Service in Obama cover-up?
Posted on 05/23/2010 4:36:17 PM PDT by Retired Intelligence Officer
Is the U.S. Selective Service System now blocking access to President Barack Obama's online registration records?
Members of the public searching the federal database for the commander in chief's registration are suddenly finding new difficulty, possibly due to the startling revelation of Obama's alleged use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number.
The Selective Service System, or SSS, collects names of Americans for use by the Department of Defense in the event of a national emergency. On its website, it says it provides the nation "with a structure and a system of guidelines which will provide the most prompt, efficient, and equitable draft possible, if the country should need it."
The problems using the SSS search engine come in the wake of WND's disclosure that two private investigators working independently are wondering why Obama is using a Social Security Number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
The stunning revelation apparently prompted Internet giant Google to clamp down specifically on WND's report and warn that some sites carrying information on the situation "may harm your computer."
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records
More in Article
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
When you look at the image of Zero’s alleged USSS registration card, it is stamped with a USPS seal showing a date of July 29, 1980.
The date he signed it was July 30,1980.
You can do a title search on Fr or google Obama social Security numbers.
One of the PI that found the ss#s info used to work for Scotland Yard.
I figured freepers would not be so far behind on info. It’s been on here for some time.
I undertand. I was pinging some of the FR crew that had incredible research during O’s running for President.
Tell that to the Illegals in Arizona, Texas, New Mexico and other southern border states who ‘paid’ for theirs!
Yes, prior to 1971 it represented the branch that assigned the number however the card had to be applied for at the social security office from which it was issued. Seeing as Obama ( according to his autobiography) did not step foot on the mainland for the first time until 1972, applying form the Conn office would have been impossible.
From the Social Security site:
Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office.
That means they had to apply for the card in the office from which it was issued.
Exactly, with a slight modification. She would have been the dem CANDIDATE. Been saying that all along too. Never in the hisory of the world would voters in the US have voted hillary for president, and both clintons had way too much to lose. They needed a candidate who could not possibly lose and a republican opponent who would...on purpose.
have it, read it, a lot of it I already knew, but there is much more that connects the dots, definitely a must read
Bingo, my FRiend.
Yeah, they did goff on Sarah. LOL She scared the bejeepers out of them when it looked like she cauld actually pull off a win for mcshame.
But juan made sure he campaigned even worse, and hogtied Palin. Why she is supporting him now is beyond me. I trust she has her reasons.
BS. I received a SSN in the late 60’s that corresponds to AZ and corresponded to my address.
Plus, they’ll be killed.
Last week, when I searched for Barry using the CT # I got the same message- Error. Sorry, your request cannot be processed at this time because you have exceeded the daily limit for the verification of these credentials.Uhhh, maybe because many many people are searching for Obama's selective service record since that story broke about the Connecticut prefix, whereas the only person looking for your record is you. They probably have a limit on the number of times you can issue the same search as a way of preventing DDoS attacks (look it up).
When I searched using my own info-I got right in.
Come on guys, let's be a bit more selective about our conspiracy theories lest we all look like whackadoodles. There's plenty of legitimately suspicious stuff about Obowmao without inventing this kind of stuff.
Remember it was Hillary that did the pro bono legal work to establish ACORN.
Yep. It’s on the very, very, very long thread.
That specific SS# is recycled from a diseased person???
Oh yeah. She was an alinsky radical before bammy was a gleam in his daddy’s eye.
ONLY if the digging is concerning a Republican (Nixon, etc.) for a DemocRAT will never ever happen!!!
Obie’s Selective Service
I can NOT for the life of me,understand how so many SMART people have completely missed this. Add this to the timing of the financial meltdown and clinton’s meetings with obama on 9/11 in New York, AND mccain at clinton’s global initiative fund raiser on mccain’s way to DC to hammer the republicans into the bailout, and how could you NOT connect these dots?
Glenn Beck needs to talk to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.