Obama Loses Border Battle

Human Events ^ | 05/26/2010 | Connie Hair

[Gator113]

THAT needs to be on a billboard.

[Jack Hydrazine]

The Israelis have put up a security wall that stands about 30 feet tall. It has been very effective in stopping terrorist attacks both by car and by foot. Think of what it could do for our illegal immigration problem and the Islamic terrorists coming across!

What if there was a private fund raising drive, (by FR?) that was tax-deductible, to finance the construction of a border wall like this? The funds that would be raised could be used to hire the Israeli firm that built the wall in Israel with the stipulation that they hire skilled Americans for its construction. This would rankle Obama like you wouldn't believe. And we'd need a few token illegal Mexicans to help build the wall so it would bring some irony to the whole story.

[Bad~Rodeo]

What if there was a private fund raising drive, (by FR?) that was tax-deductible, to finance the construction of a border wall like this?

A wall like that, 2000 miles long? Wheew.... The illegals in jail would definately have something to do.....Here's the one in San Diego/Tijuana

[Jack Hydrazine]

I can’t see it. Is it the new ‘virtual fence’? LOL!

[1951Boomer]

The routes they use are littered with Korans, prayer rugs, and other junk indicative of Islamists. The garden variety illegal Mexicans may be the LEAST of our immigration problems.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Incorrect. The National Guard units are STATE run entities. Up until the 1980’s, when President Reagan issued an EO changing the way things worked, the president had to ask permission from the governors to use them. Except when they are mobilized by the president, their commanders in chief is the governor of their respective states.

[Bad~Rodeo]

Left off the /s, LOL~

[counterpunch]

Lame. People like you want to give Sarah Palin credit for everything, just by her mere existence. Every day when the sun rises, you thank Sarah Palin for making it happen. Sorry, but Brewer is a very intelligent woman. I don’t think she needs or wants Palin “by her side.”

[counterpunch]

The truth is that Sarah Palin is by Juan McCain’s side as he demands “amnistía.”

[SoConPubbie]

Go to Brewer's site securetheborder.org and Palin is all over it.

Brewer and Palin - two strong women making a difference.

Don't confuse counterpunch with facts.

His brain works slowly this time of night.

Couple that with his latent PDS, and it is a deadly combination which removes all common-sense and objectivity.

[SoConPubbie]

Lame. People like you want to give Sarah Palin credit for everything, just by her mere existence. Every day when the sun rises, you thank Sarah Palin for making it happen. Sorry, but Brewer is a very intelligent woman. I don’t think she needs or wants Palin “by her side.”

Like I said, PDS.

A perfect example.

[onyx]

Go to Brewer's site securetheborder.org and Palin is all over it.
Brewer and Palin - two strong women making a difference.

bwc2221 is right. Sarah was the first to support Governor Brewer and she was with her for the weekend the day after she signed the bill into law. In fact, I posted pics of the two of them from the Diamondback baseball game they attended together.

Sarah has since returned to support her close friend Jan. I guess counterpunch might have missed that widely televised news conference.

Sarah fully supports AZ law and her friend Jan Brewer, without reservation, and she's made that clear serveral times in every interview and presser she's given.

I might also add, that Sarah still remains the only voice speaking out for the girls basketball team from the Chicago area that's been forbidden to travel to AZ by the libtard school board.

[counterpunch]

Just because Sarah Palin shows up where ever there’s a camera, that doesn’t make her a leader.
She still endorsed Juan McCain over JD Hayworth, and has been campaigning and raising money for McCain.
Just as she endorsed FioRINO over DeVore.
So where it counts, Palin can’t be counted on.

[omegadawn]

The governors are in control of their units only in non- military useage. they can call out the guards for state emergencies. The big difference is that the weapons carries by national guard units are strickly controlled by the Federal goverment. The governor can order units to duty in the state but without weapons, for that he needs Federal permission. How does a governor protect a state with unarmed soldiers?