Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

And what part of “Petition for Reconsideration and Suggestion for a Hearing En Banc” do YOU not understand?

This case is before the panel for reconsideration in light of their unsupported opinion that is contrary to Supreme Court precedent in many ways, AND is also before the entire panel of the court for consideration by the full court for the first time.

Such a Petiton and Suggestion is the normal course and is, as a practical matter, required before seeking Supreme Court review.


46 posted on 06/03/2010 12:45:33 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

And what part of “Petition for Reconsideration and Suggestion for a Hearing En Banc” do YOU not understand?

This case is before the panel for reconsideration in light of their unsupported opinion that is contrary to Supreme Court precedent in many ways, AND is also before the entire panel of the court for consideration by the full court for the first time.

Such a Petiton and Suggestion is the normal course and is, as a practical matter, required before seeking Supreme Court review.


I’ll think that I’ll just wait patiently until the petition is denied. Recusals do not come after judgements and lawsuits that do not bother to file under the legal name of the defendant are frivolous and lawyers who file frivolous lawsuits aren often reprimanded.


47 posted on 06/03/2010 1:38:20 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson