Skip to comments.Palin to Obama on oil companies: 'Give me a call'
Posted on 06/08/2010 6:19:28 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) -- Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said President Barack Obama's acknowledgment that he hasn't directly spoken to BP's chief executive shows it "bodes well to have some sort of executive experience before occupying the Oval Office."
Then, in a Facebook posting Tuesday, she outlined her experience.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
I can imagine dear little Becky Bohrer typing this story with tears rolling down her cheeks. But she did regain her composure quickly enough in order to avoid specifically telling us of Palin’s experience.
Ouch, that’a gonna leave a mark!
Less Talkin, More Kickin
Today at 2:31pm
50 days in, and weve just learned another shocking revelation concerning the Obama administrations response to the Gulf oil spill. In an interview aired this morning, President Obama admitted that he hasnt met with or spoken directly to BPs CEO Tony Hayward. His reasoning: Because my experience is, when you talk to a guy like a BP CEO, hes gonna say all the right things to me. Im not interested in words. Im interested in actions.
First, to the informed and enlightened mainstream media: in all the discussions youve had with the White House about the spill, did it not occur to you before today to ask how the CEO-to-CEO level discussions were progressing to remedy this tragedy? You never cease to amaze. (Kind of reminds us of the months on end when you never bothered to ask if the President was meeting with General McChrystal to talk about our strategy in Afghanistan.)
Second, to fellow baffled Americans: this revelation is further proof that it bodes well to have some sort of executive experience before occupying the Oval Office (as if the painfully slow response to the oil spill, confusion of duties, finger-pointing, lack of preparedness, and inability to grant local government simple requests werent proof enough). The current administration may be unaware that its the Presidents duty, meeting on a CEO-to-CEO level with Hayward, to verify what BP reports. In an interview a few weeks ago with Greta Van Susteren, I noted that based on my experience working with oil execs as an oil regulator and then as a Governor, you must verify what the oil companies claim because their perception of circumstances and situations dealing with public resources and public trust is not necessarily shared by those who own Americas public resources and trust. I was about run out of town in Alaska for what critics decried at the time as my playing hardball with Big Oil, and those same adversaries (both shortsighted Repubs and Dems) continue to this day to try to discredit my administrations efforts in holding Big Oil accountable to operate ethically and responsibly.
Mr. President: with all due respect, you have to get involved, sir. The priorities and timeline of an oil company are not the same as the publics. You cannot outsource the cleanup and the responsibility and the trust to BP and expect that the legitimate interests of Americans adversely affected by this spill will somehow be met.
White House: have you read this mornings Washington Post? Not to pile it on BP, but theres an extensive report chronicling the companys troubling history:
BP has had more high-profile accidents than any other company in recent years. And now, with the disaster in the gulf, independent experts say the pervasiveness of the companys problems, in multiple locales and different types of facilities, is striking.
They are a recurring environmental criminal and they do not follow U.S. health safety and environmental policy, said Jeanne Pascal, a former EPA lawyer who led its BP investigations.
And yet just 10 days prior to the explosion, the Obama administrations regulators gave the oil rig a pass, and last year the Obama administration granted BP a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) exemption for its drilling operation.
These decisions and the resulting spill have shaken the publics confidence in the ability to safely drill. Unless government appropriately regulates oil developments and holds oil executives accountable, the public will not trust them to drill, baby, drill. And we must! Or we will be even more beholden to, and controlled by, dangerous foreign regimes that supply much of our energy. This has been a constant refrain from me. As Governor of Alaska, I did everything in my power to hold oil companies accountable in order to prove to the federal government and to the nation that Alaska could be trusted to further develop energy rich land like ANWR and NPR-A. I hired conscientious Democrats and Republicans (because this sure shouldnt be a partisan issue) to provide me with the best advice on how we could deal with what was a corrupt system of some lawmakers and administrators who were hesitant to play hardball with some in the oil field business. (Remember the Alaska lawmakers, public decision-makers, and business executives who ended up going to jail as a result of the FBIs investigations of oily corruption.)
As the aforementioned article notes, BPs operation in Alaska would hurt our state and waste public resources if allowed to continue. Thats why my administration created the Petroleum Systems Integrity Office (PSIO) when we saw proof of improper maintenance of oil infrastructure in our state. We had to verify. And thats why we instituted new oversight and held BP and other oil companies financially accountable for poor maintenance practices. We knew we could partner with them to develop resources without pussyfooting around with them. As a CEO, it was my job to look out for the interests of Alaskans with the same intensity and action as the oil company CEOs looked out for the interests of their shareholders.
I learned firsthand the way these companies operate when I served as chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC). I ended up resigning in protest because my bosses (the Governor and his chief of staff at the time) wouldnt support efforts to clean up the corruption involving improper conflicts of interest with energy companies that the state was supposed to be watching. (I wrote about this valuable learning experience in my book, Going Rogue.) I felt guilty taking home a big paycheck while being reduced to sitting on my thumbs essentially rendered ineffective as a supervisor of a regulatory agency in charge of nearly 20% of the U.S. domestic supply of energy.
My experience (though, granted, I got the message loud and clear during the campaign that my executive experience managing the fastest growing community in the state, and then running the largest state in the union, was nothing compared to the experiences of a community organizer) showed me how government officials and oil execs could scratch each others backs to the detriment of the public, and it made me ill. I ran for Governor to fight such practices. So, as a former chief executive, I humbly offer this advice to the President: you must verify. That means you must meet with Hayward. Demand answers.
In the interview today, the President said: I dont sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar. We talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know whose ass to kick.
Please, sir, for the sake of the Gulf residents, reach out to experts who have experience holding oil companies accountable. I suggested a few weeks ago that you start with Alaskas Department of Natural Resources, led by Commissioner Tom Irwin. Having worked with Tom and his DNR and AGIA team led by Marty Rutherford, I can vouch for their integrity and expertise in dealing with Big Oil and overseeing its developments. Weve all lived and worked through the Exxon-Valdez spill. They can help you. Give them a call. Or, what the heck, give me a call.
And, finally, Mr. President, please do not punish the American public with any new energy tax in response to this tragedy. Just because BP and federal regulators screwed up that doesnt mean the rest of us should get punished with higher taxes at the pump and attached to everything petroleum products touch.
- Sarah Palin
That is what I was thinking!
Obama : I won!
It shows once again that it is not a good idea to send a bi-sexual, affirmative action, illegal alien wimp to do a man’s job.
What she said!
Now that's a good one...
Sarah is such a great thinker on everything except candidates in my state and that stinker John McCain.
I sure wish she’d spend more time thinking and less time on FaceBook.
Obama should of put Palin in charge of this right off the bat.
A picture is worth a thousand words...
I think she’s pep rallying right now but she’ll be chalk talking right before the game starts.
Well okay, but are you sure? ;^)
She says what alot of us are thinking....
But I can dream and I'm dreaming of this November along with Mrs. tractorman and tractorman II and III and a lot of our friends and relatives.
This is going to be very interesting indeed!
Sarah knows what she is doing and she has the guts to do it.
She is a real leader.
>> to do a mans job.
And not to the exclusion of women like Palin.
Dripping with sarcasm. I love it.
But of course he deals with dictators in exactly the opposite way: Bowing, glad-handing, and basically tongue-bathing. Why can't he demand the same "actions" from rogue states that he wants from corporations?
Obama is still trying to figure out how to vote present on this crisis!
Palin would have acted quickly to contain and cleanup the spill.
Obama’s response was 50 days of partying, golfing, and vacationing. Kick ass and party on dudes.
Palin shouldn’t let herself be tied to this sinking political ship.
I posted that very idea here a couple weeks ago. But I suspect his ego is too massive for him to risk her having a “success” at cleaning up his mess.
I sure wish DoughtyOne’d spend more time opposing Obama and less time whining about Sarah Palin on FR.
I agree TractorMan. This will be better than ten SuperBowls for me.
This little “Tweet” from Gov.Palin will stick in obama’s vag’ like sandpaper panties.....
Sarah, you’re a stitch!
He sounds like a stupid junior high school punk....really really disgusting. And "my experience"...what a sick joke. He wouldn't make it 10 minutes as a real CEO. Reminds me of Blagojevich on the Apprentice - all he could do was talk - not good at anything else.
Any president that hasn’t after 50 days of this spoken directly to the president of BP, each Gulf state governor, and many more doesn’t know much about serving as president.
“I sure wish shed spend more time thinking and less time on FaceBook.”
Are you kidding? This is a beautifully-reasoned, excellently written treatise, and it KICKS O’S BUTT! Keep it up, Sarah!
“I sure wish DoughtyOned spend more time opposing Obama and less time whining about Sarah Palin on FR.”
I completely agree!
I’ll be listening a lot more intently when she quits supporting Obama-lite against J.D. Hayworth for six more years in the U.S. Senate.
I find it shocking that Hayward has not called the White House either. What an idiot. Two bozos running the show.
That’s okay Josh.
I’ll quite dumping on Republicans when they quite doing the things McCain has, and stop supporting those who do them.
ever here the saying “can not see the forest for the trees” that about sums up your worldview.
Funny how Palin makes repeated reference to the concept of ethics/morals, showing it to be a critical component in dealing with big oil.
Seems like I’ve heard that before, somewhere. Palin is a true moral leader.
Unlike Obama, who doesn’t know how to choose right from wrong any more than his internet trolls can understand in rational terms why they actually support him.
Okay, thanks for playing.
Don Pardo, please tell us what our parting guest takes with him...
True moral leaders do not spend months on end hawking an immoral man.
I’m glad she sees it with Obama and BP. I wish she could see it with John McCain.
clueless to the end I see you are.
when you talk to a guy like a BP CEO, hes gonna say all the right things to me. Im not interested in words. Im interested in actions.
If you want to get things moving wouldn’t it be best to meet with the head man directly. It’s no wonder things are moving so slowly.
She was in a no-win situation on this one. I prefer JD (and I'm sure she does too), but she had to be loyal to the guy who made her well known.
The believer’s intrinsic sense of right and wrong guides a true leader’s decisions. A moral relativist can never get that, only try to mimic it.
They are sooner or later betrayed by a foolish statement, indicating that they have no foundation within themselves.
LOL, look I’ve got too think a skin to let that bother me.
When it gets to the point that you think McCain is supportable and Sarah is above reproach for doing it, your comments mean nothing to me.
If you can’t be honest with yourself, why should I respect you?
Come on, you can do better than that.
A guy does you a favor (because he needs you much worse than you need him), and that buys your loyalty?
That’s putting far too cheap a price on your loyalty.
yeah just what I want in the WH another Obama.
If you allow your hatred for McCain to blind you to everything else your nuts. Palin showed class and strong character with her endorsement of McCain. A lesser person would have did what you wanted and left McCain to sink on his own.
I have no doubt in the same situation Obama would have turned his back on McCain.
“If you cant be honest with yourself, why should I respect you?”
We haven’t seen pissant’s cheap shots at Palin here lately; without him to support your feckless reasoning, you are a minority of one. But, pot-stirring and free speech are alive and well on FR unlike the libtard websites.
When you’re shoveling manure, you can’t claim to be pure(ist) as the driven snow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.