Skip to comments.Perez Hilton Twitter Account Posts Naked Miley Cyrus Upskirt Picture (felony)
Posted on 06/15/2010 9:01:08 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
NEW YORK (CBS) Perez Hilton might be in some hot water after posting an uncensored photo of Miley Cyrus' private parts to his Twitter account.
Early Monday morning, Hilton posted a picture of the 17-year-old pop star wearing a short white dress and no underwear. In the photo, Cyrus is in the midst of climbing out of an open-topped convertible car with her lady parts exposed.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
Miley, get yourself some underwear. You're a hundred-millionaire. You can afford it.
Seems more of a candidate for rehab than prison.
Distribution of child pornography is a felony. I hope this waste of matter goes to prison.
Seeing that her father wears his hair like a girl, she's having some confusion about what it means to become a lady.
Calling Perez Hilton an idiot or a d-bag is an insult to idiots and d-bags everywhere.
Stay classy, Miley
Be a good example to your little sister and all the other 9 year olds who still consider you a “star” (sarc) because the 10’s and above tweens consider you so “over”
Note —Perez Hilton is not Paris Hilton.
Perez Hilton is a flamboyant male homosexual.
Why is it with fags things eventually turn into underage sex of some kind?
Somebody should drag that goofy looking SOB to a barber shop.
Nothing will come of this.
Because they are perverts.
Her having “lady parts” would imply that she were an actual lady. So not the case here, apparrently.
Counting down the hours until Miley morphs into a raging slut like Madonna.
If there is justice, Hilton had better “lawyer up”.
Sure seems like a cry for help of some sort.
Perhaps friends and family will toss a net over him before it's too late.
17 year old and miniskirt with no panties...that is what a grown woman might do with her husband on date nite
on a 17 year old then she’s active I can promise ya.
Mixed up people in this world— including both of the two herein mentioned.
We as a society, have so lost our way.
I don’t know whose worse...this demented queer d-bag and his deranged website, Miley Cyrus for walking around with no underwear in situations where she knows that will be noticed, or her old man for sexualizing her image beginning at age 15?
This is 1,000 times worse, when the photo magnet is underage. Every one of the paparazzi (and fans, who happen to be around), who snapped her picture, as she was getting out of the car; inadvertently committed a felony. (Hilton did so, deliberately, when he posted the pic to his Tweeter account.)
I thought that was Paris Hilton for a minute there ... LOL ...
Ew! Ick! Ick! Ick! Ick!
This is beyond sick and wrong.
Wow Miley is going down Lindsey’s dark path. From Disney darling to used up skank in less than a decade.
Oh, yes, mother, your right, you're always right, some of them are velly nice.
i looked up the news on this
the pic I saw was from a London show and she has on panties...the neekid one may have been photoshopped
Perez Hilton is a typical neurotic caker anyhow...a perv fool
Any girl wearing a dress and no underwear is plain stupid. She is a disgrace, this guy, whoever he is (never heard of him) is also a disgrace.
I think he would enjoy prision
Ms Hilton will ‘get off’ free because all this is a misunderstanding. . .
he’s one of them
As long as he stays out of prison, this is nirvana for they guy. Publicity, guaranteed hits on his site, and pumps up his outrageous image. It’s very doubtful there’d be a conviction in a state where they still just consider Roman Polanski misunderstood.
I blew a lot of money taking my grandkids to see a Miley Cyrus concert a couple of years ago. I thought she was a decent performer, and an acceptable role model. Now, it turns out she is just a stupid little skank. She poses all pouty, trying to look sultry and edgy. She just looks stupid and pathetic.
Nothing will come of this. Perez likes putting his penis in other boy’s anuses. That means he is more enlightened than all of us.
It is his social responsibility to put his penis in as many boys’ anuses as time allows. And it is socially irresponsible for anyone to interfere or object.
In court, it will be found that to object to his publishing of child porn is wrong, his child-porn is right, and he is hero for gifting the world with his published photo of Miley Cyrus’ 17 year old vagina. Also, it is fair to showcase him and his struggle to expose the 17 year old vagina by allowing him to also flaunt that he enjoys putting his penis in the anuses of boys.
Angry yet ? Remember this viewpoint the next time someone tells you there is no gay agenda. Remember this the next time you hear someone saying that it’s alright.
Fitting that this homophiliac would post child porn to further the over-sexation of American youth agenda. Do not discount that the Disney pop whore was in on this. She and her pedo father are in on this.
I thought that was Shirley Manson and Garbage.
“lady” hardly, what kind of father would let his 17 year old daughter be anywhere close to this pervert?
I hope it brings Perez down. He is utter scum of the earth.
so why is this homosexual looking at underage girls’ “parts”?
I was reading some of the other stories on this subject. Apparently, Miley moved out of her parent's home into her own multi-million dollar LA pad months ago. Currently, she's living with her 23-year old Australian boyfriend. So yes, I think it's probably safe to assume she's "active".
They, at least, covered up the part in question...unlike filthy Perez Hilton.
Great way to drive hits to that pervert’s Twitter account, not to mention the “promotion” of child pornography - wtg CBS!
Have you happened to catch the new Huggies diaper commercial? I was appalled last night.
Correction: Her boyfriend is only 20. My mistake. Still, if she’s living with him in her own place, it doesn’t take a lot of imagination to figure out what’s going on.
Double sentence! One for posting ‘kiddie’ porn and one for giving that skunk some airtime. That’s what she wanted
He’s not really looking at her genitalia. He has sensed that laws don’t apply to him, and he’s taking advantage of that, and engaging in a very public form of drama.
Standard in-your-face outre fag stuff.
I doubt he is even going to see the inside of a courtroom over this. He is part of the cultural elite (read postmodern sewer), so rules don’t apply.
The homo Hilton is a pig, but so is the girl.
“Jeffrey Douglas, a Los Angeles criminal defense attorney who specializes in child pornography cases, told Salon that Hilton’s liability is “extraordinary and intense” and that it was “suicidal for him to do this.” He added: “We’re not talking about a misdemeanor. You don’t have to know what the definition of the law is; all you have to do is knowingly distribute the photograph” — which Hilton, or someone with access to his Twitter account, most certainly did. It doesn’t matter much whether Hilton took the photo, owns the photo or published the photo — as long as he knowingly distributed the link.
Some are speculating that the image was Photoshopped — so, what then? “Under the law, that is still a crime and it is punishable just the same,” says Douglas. “For instance, if you were to take the face of an 8-year-old and put that picture on the nude body of even an identifiable, fully developed adult porn star, it is child-porn punishable identical to if you took a photo of the actual child.” What’s more, depending on how the image is presented, there is the potential for the shot to be considered child porn even if Cyrus is actually wearing form-fitting underwear; in fact, Douglas says there has been debate in the past over similar images Hilton has published of Cyrus in the past. All it will take is an enterprising attorney interested in making an example out of him; he could be prosecuted on the state or federal level — or both — with a conviction potentially resulting in a 15-year sentence and lifetime registration as a sex offender. Douglas says that “if he’s not prosecuted, there is one reason why: his name is Perez Hilton.””
You don't suppose Miley exposed herself unintentionally? Surely, you don"t.