Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Unlikeable Palin
American Conservative ^ | 7/2/10 | Daniel Larison

Posted on 07/02/2010 6:07:54 PM PDT by pissant

Outside of Republicans, she’s not popular at all. According to our NBC/WSJ poll, just 29% view her favorably, compared with 43% who view her unfavorably (not far from George W. Bush’s 29%-50% score). In addition, the poll shows that 52% have problems with a candidate who has been endorsed by Palin, versus only 25% who are comfortable with that attribute. We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: Palin is more of a political celebrity than a political figure. ~First Read

This is true, but there is nothing here about Palin that we know now that we didn’t already know a year or a year and a half ago. Her unfavorables among non-Republicans have gone up steadily since the Republican convention in 2008, and outside of a dedicated core of admirers and a few critics no one is taking her political chances seriously. This is the same as it has been for a very long time. As Josh Green notes, it would normally be absurd to think that someone with a 14-point favorability deficit was a serious presidential contender, and there aren’t that many non-partisans who think that she is anything of the kind. The reality is that the more independents and Democrats see of Palin, the less they like. In a country where these people make up at least 65% of the electorate, Palin is essentially unelectable in a general election. This isn’t a difficult call to make. The question to which we don’t know the answer yet is whether the GOP is so willfully blind to this reality and so bent on self-destruction in 2012 that the party nominates her anyway. For all of the reasons I have given before, I very much doubt that Republicans are this foolish. It is possible that the GOP will decide

(Excerpt) Read more at amconmag.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: anklebiters; duncanwho; eunomia4obama; fauxconservative; fauxgopwhine; neonaziwhine; obamathanksyou; onepercenters; operationleper; palin; pds; pimpromney; pimpromneyhere; pimpromneynow; pimpromneyplease; pissant; postpaidforbymitt; romney; romneyantipalin; usefulidiots; whenmittbotsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: JApost
Be honest. Have you EVER heard Romney cogently explain how to create private sector jobs? I dare you to provide examples of him explaining how he specifically would do it from the dates of Nov. 2007 to the present. And then add up the jobs he eliminated/sent overseas and subtract this number from the jobs he “created” buying companies and cutting payrolls and report to us the answer. Romney is probably the worst candidate in a couple of generations. He’s the 2nd generation of 4 generations of trust fund Americans(nothing against that but he’s never faced any economic hardships, he’s never really had to work for a living,by the sweat of his brow, probably never changed a flat tire or had callouses on his hands). Has he changed his mind about not agreeing with the Reagan economic policies of the ‘80’s and the value of tax cuts in spurring economic growth/job creation during Reagan era? I will spend tens of thousands to defeat him for what he has done to Sarah Palin and for him allowing/standing by as the establishment GOP beta-males/girls have attacked /denigrated her from Sept. 1, 2008 to the present.

Thread winner.


101 posted on 07/02/2010 9:56:22 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (http://www.conservatives4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Every candidate that she has endorsed ends up winning.
______________________________________________________________
You said it before I did. And, I think the Dems are scared to death of her, that’s why they hate her so.


102 posted on 07/02/2010 9:58:58 PM PDT by no dems (Palin/Jindal in 2012 or Jindal/Palin in 2012. Either is fine with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Your Post #8 is “RIGHT ON”


103 posted on 07/02/2010 10:01:17 PM PDT by no dems (Palin/Jindal in 2012 or Jindal/Palin in 2012. Either is fine with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

That kind of reminds of Baby Bush.

As Ron Paul pointed out, Baby Bush was against nation building before he was for it.

That is the best foreign policy observation Ron Paul ever made, as I disagree with Ron Paul as much on foreign policy as I agree with him on economic policy.


104 posted on 07/02/2010 10:02:56 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas; All
I don't think the GOP candidate will be the Mormon Romney with his "Mormon Underwear" or Huckleberry, a Baptist Preacher from Arkansas; America is ready for neither. I think it will be a virtual dark horse such as Gov. Bobby Jindal of LA or Gov. Chris Christie of NJ.
But, I'm not counting out my girl Sarah.
105 posted on 07/02/2010 10:07:51 PM PDT by no dems (Palin/Jindal in 2012 or Jindal/Christie in 2012. Either is fine with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


106 posted on 07/02/2010 10:18:13 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: SQUID
Please explain how here credentials make her presidential material?

You may start with her education

What would you consider the minimum qualifications to be?

107 posted on 07/02/2010 10:20:01 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SQUID; EagleUSA
You may start with her education

So, you're an elitist!?
108 posted on 07/02/2010 10:30:31 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter; JApost
It is all about marketing and Romney can be marketed as a pro-business jobs creating candidate in a way that most of the most mentioned names cannot.
Yea, and tell us again how all of his money and all that PR effort trying to white-wash his past anti-GOP, anti-Conservative, and anti-God positions did in the 2008 Primaries?

Oh, that's right, he failed miserably against the worst possible candidate the GOP has put up in years, John "McAmnesty" McCain.

Romney will never win the nomination, he will attempt to act the spoiler though possibly allowing another John McCain or Huckster to slide through and dooming us to another 4 to 8 years of Democratic control of the Federal Government.
109 posted on 07/02/2010 10:36:14 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter
As Ron Paul pointed out, Baby Bush was against nation building before he was for it.

During the 2000 campaign, Bush actually got caught not knowing who Pervez Musharraf was. He sure as hell found out, didn't he!

110 posted on 07/02/2010 10:39:31 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
Jindal is a good governor for LA, but ...

Jindal is not a Natural Born Citizen.

If Jindal gets traction in 2012, your gay definition of NBC will matter not a whit, especially since the Obama precedent has already been set in concrete.

111 posted on 07/02/2010 10:49:16 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ez

I agree, Palin is quite likable in much the same way as Reagan. She’ll win converts by the bushel when the time is right. The right time will be between the nominating convention and the 2012 elections.


112 posted on 07/02/2010 10:49:23 PM PDT by upsdriver (ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
... especially since the Obama precedent has already been set in concrete.

Especially because of it. Double standards are a Democrat specialty.

113 posted on 07/02/2010 10:59:06 PM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Just nobody out there willing to take on the right people and say the right things like Sarah Palin. Until that changes she’s got my complete support.

It’s just hard to believe she hasn’t won more people over with her right on point attacks on the liberal agenda.


114 posted on 07/02/2010 11:09:42 PM PDT by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

It’s not surprising that the majority of FReepers love and adore Sarah Palin. But we do not sway elections. Yes, Democrats fear her .. but so do Independents. Without the latter, you don’t win elections.

“Every candidate she has endorsed ends up winning” a Republican primary. Who, exactly, votes in Republican primaries? ta da .. conservatives! I don’t recall her being involved in either VA or NJ last year for the general, statewide elections, and can’t recall her endorsing either man at the top of the ticket. IIRC, the VA candidate asked her to stay out of the race, so that scenario is more likely in bluer NJ.

We won’t even know for sure after the ‘10 elections how her Right endorsements played because of the historically high anti-incumbent sentiment.

Right now there is no one on the GOP horizon that *I* would rather see carry the GOP banner in ‘12, but, frankly, I don’t think she can win. Not without a seachange in attitudes across the USA. I fear she’s been successfully Borked or Quayled. And I think she knows that but will use her influence where it can do some good.


115 posted on 07/02/2010 11:35:00 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

So what you are looking for is a candidate who doesn’t make waves such as not telling Boma where he is wrong,
tells the MSM what they want to hear so they don’t attack
that candidate.

No thanks, I will support Sarah Palin who can take care of herself vs. the MSM .

I don’t let the MSM tell me who to support


116 posted on 07/02/2010 11:52:16 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

117 posted on 07/03/2010 12:03:19 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Yes, Democrats fear her .. but so do Independents. Without the latter, you don’t win elections.

That independent equals moderate is leftist propaganda (from Democrats and from RINOS).

The focus guy on FoxNews has shown that independents are NOT moderates, and that the vast majority of independents are conservative, far more conservative than either the Democrat communists or the RINO "moderates".

118 posted on 07/03/2010 12:10:49 AM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

You Betcha!


119 posted on 07/03/2010 12:15:41 AM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Palin hasn’t run for any national office except VP, and that was in McCain’s shadow so there was a limit on how bright she could shine. If she grabbed for the brass ring in earnest, her positive numbers would shoot up like a rocket.


120 posted on 07/03/2010 2:16:34 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson