Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE SAVAGE NATION!!!!!! 7-5-10
www.michaelsavage.wnd.com ^ | 7-5-10 | Dr. Michael Savage

Posted on 07/05/2010 2:58:29 PM PDT by dynachrome

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

(Excerpt) Read more at michaelsavage.wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: borders; culture; happy4th; language; savagenation; talkradio
Hope everyone had a bountiful and a reflective 4th!
1 posted on 07/05/2010 2:58:36 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 09Patriot; abigail2; Avoiding_Sulla; BellStar; b4its2late; Blue Turtle; BootsOfEscaping; ...

Live, memorex, or fill-in, here we are!


2 posted on 07/05/2010 3:01:47 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Find a stream here:

http://streamingradioguide.com/streaming-radio-stations.php/


3 posted on 07/05/2010 3:03:07 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I didn’t think he’d be there. But, that’s okay. Peter is a good fill-in, anyway.


4 posted on 07/05/2010 3:11:10 PM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Peter Weisbach Nation today


5 posted on 07/05/2010 3:11:31 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

I prefer a fillin rather than a rerun


6 posted on 07/05/2010 3:13:17 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Oh, me, too! I’ve usually heard the rerun the first time it aired.

I’ve seen that the call Dr. Savage took from the stupid Jo in Boca Raton has been making the email rounds.


7 posted on 07/05/2010 3:16:42 PM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Refresh our minds what stupid Jo said.

Here’s an idea: Post a portion of the email.


8 posted on 07/05/2010 3:19:35 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus CONSERVATIVE is a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

never mind. I found it. Yes, she was pulling the Doc’s leg. She’s a troll that knows how to get on the air.

Stevex09
A Liberal drags Michael Savage into Hell …
Posted in America, Barack Obama, Illegal Immigrants, Welfare, documented stupidity, government, liberal views, lunacy, politics by steve on May 27, 2010

This is an exchange between Michael Savage and a lady named Jo who lives in Boca Raton, Florida. They’re discussing the Arizona Immigration Law. Folks, this is the perfect example of the intellectual level, and mind set of the typical liberal:

Savage: Let’s go to Boca Raton, Florida. She’s on the other side; Jo in Boca Raton, welcome. You say the Arizona law is wrong. Is that correct?

Jo: Yes, I think it’s absolutely racist; that they’re telling illegal aliens can’t come into Arizona. They can do what they want to. I mean, we’re America, we have open borders …

Savage: Wait. Wait. You’re saying too many things at once. They’re saying what?

Jo: That we need to have…

Savage: Wait. Wait. Wait. Ma’am, are you aware of the fact that a country has borders? Are you aware of that?

Jo: I’m saying tha we need to get rid of our borders so we can welcome all forms and walks of life.

Savage: Of course you’re pulling my leg.

Jo: I’m serious. Just look at how your ancestors got here.

Savage: Well, they didn’t come here illegally. Maybe your’s did. How did your’s get here? Did they come here illegally?

Jo: I don’t know. But they got here somehow. And now …

Savage: Well, apparently they, they pulled from the lowest level of the gene pool from where you came from. That you don’t even know how a nation is defined.
How many people do you think this country could sustain with open borders? Is there a limit? An upper limit in your mind?

Jo: I think we could sustain so many people because there’s …

Savage: I said how many? How many people are in America today? How many millions?

Jo: Six hundred million.

Savage: Oh my God! Oh boy, we’re in trouble aren’t we. So, you just guessed at that I could see, because that’s not the correct number. Okay, we’ll give you another chance. How many people do you think the United States of America could sustain if we had no borders and anybody could just enter the country? How many people?

Jo: We need to put limits on people’s income because people are making way too much money and they need to …

Savage: So, in other words, it’s not the number of people here, it’s the amount of money people are making?

Jo: Yes, it’s the greed in America. We need to …

Savage: I see. How much money do you make a year Jo?

Jo: Right now I’m on a welfare check, but that doesn’t matter…

Savage: Ah! You’re on a welfare check. That’s why you’re so benevolent with other people’s money. So you’re telling men like me, who work for a living, who pay your welfare check that I should be limited to how much I make so you can make more money doing nothing?

Jo: Well, I think that … you don’t pay my welfare check! I think Obama pays my welfare check and I …

Savage: Wait. Wait. Wait a minute! Obama pays it out of his pocket? Where does he get the money from Jo?

Jo: I don’t know. His stash. I don’t know where he gets it. But the thing is …

Savage: What do you mean you don’t know where he gets it from? It’s called the Public Treasury. Where does the money come from into the Public Treasury Jo?

Jo: Illegal aliens who work for a living, then they pass the money to the government.

Savage: Jo, you’re a very sick person. I really, I really pity you Jo, and you should never hve been able to get on this show; because a man once defined Hell as a place where there is no reason, and you just dragged me into Hell Jo.


9 posted on 07/05/2010 3:24:48 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus CONSERVATIVE is a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

yeah, she was over the top. Suspiciously so. troll is right.


10 posted on 07/05/2010 3:28:01 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

I had never heard her before that call. When it first aired, my husband and I stared at each other with our mouths open (and not because we’re “mouth-breathers.” HA!). I thought she HAD to be joking, but she stuck to her story without cracking up laughing. Regardless, there are actually people who do think like she talked, and those people vote.

AIEEE!!!


11 posted on 07/05/2010 3:31:31 PM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

And the doc didn’t like it — officially — but his rating loves her appearance.

How is that Av?

Because the programmers know that anything that allows the audience to say to themselves: “oh what a fool!” oh what a jerk!.” etc. let’s the listener feel SUPERIOR.

For those who think I’m wrong, let me relieve you.

One of the most popular recurring bits on Jay Leno is “Jay Walking.”

The subjects of his interviews KNOW they don’t get on air giving Jay the RIGHT answers, only stupid-funny ones. They’ve got their TiVos set at home to capture their moment on-air performance. Are there people this stupid. Of course. But they’re not smart enough to be waiting for Jay Leno knowing what it takes to make it onto national TV.

Same thing with Jo. Savage and the listeners say “she makes the show look stupid.” But the programmers know what boosts ratings. Make the listener feel good.

In talk radio, what is the Holy Grail? Ratings!


12 posted on 07/05/2010 3:37:24 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus CONSERVATIVE is a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Good points, Av.

I think part of the appeal is not so much that the listener feels “superior” to the “dumb” schmuck, but instead feels an awe, nearing horror, that people actually are that deaf, dumb and blind—in America.


13 posted on 07/05/2010 3:44:52 PM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Weisbach Nation?


14 posted on 07/05/2010 4:12:00 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Ted Nugent for President 2012!


15 posted on 07/05/2010 4:16:53 PM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

He’s filling in for Dr. Savage today...


16 posted on 07/05/2010 4:17:35 PM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Weisbach it is.


17 posted on 07/05/2010 4:18:10 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

We’re off for dinner, so see ya tomorrow!


18 posted on 07/05/2010 4:47:05 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Your reaction, I fear, is the intent of some who play the roll of dummy as well as some who welcome their performance.

How does tyranny gain from this?

Once you are convinced that a very large number of Americans are really as dumb as Jo or any of the Hollywood locals appearing on Jay Walking or any of the guests on any show (e.g. Jerry Springer) that showcases geeks with a story, you are more apt to believe fake voter results.

These sort of people are provocative, and provocative is entertaining even if it’s terrible and even repetitive (witness rubber-neckers at every highway accident), and entertaining begets ratings, so the allowance of the appearance geeks “sells.” In many of these shows, acting dumb pays well.

The downside, if we permit it to be, is that we become convinced there are many more REALLY like them. Anyone who feels that way and lives in a society with democratic voting, is going feel overwhelmed and despondent. You think “I am surrounded by dummies, so what’s the use?” That helps the vote riggers and the tyrant.


19 posted on 07/06/2010 9:04:23 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus CONSERVATIVE is a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

I’m not a dummy, nor do I play one on the radio. Ha.

Though none of us can possibly know the actual numbers, I am under no illusions about the intelligence, or lack thereof, in our society.

I know that right-thinking people are the majority, and still a large majority at that, but that majority is shrinking due to decades and decades of relentless paper cuts against our country by the anti-American enemy within. And, under this new hellish administration, the paper cuts have become lacerations.

The truly right-thinking people will not contribute to tyranny by being lulled to sleep in false bravado. We’re wide awake now.

[Blog pimping to show I am wide awake—my writings: http://www.dakotavoice.com/author/gina-miller/]


20 posted on 07/06/2010 4:32:12 PM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson