O M G Obama using his executive pull to ensure democRATic votes I am so shocked!
Posted on 07/06/2010 11:42:15 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
This Administration has little interest in the country or the American people. It doesn’t see anything but its own political interest.
This Administration has little interest in the country or the American people. It doesn’t see anything but its own political interest.
The refusal of the President to enforce Federal law may be reason for impeachment.
Come on Brewer file a law requiring all Presidential candidates to produce a full valid Birth Certificate before 2012.
O M G Obama using his executive pull to ensure democRATic votes I am so shocked!
To paraphrase Huckleberry Finn..., Holder might say:
Hain't we got the 9th Circuit fools on our side? And ain't that a big enough majority in any Case?"
Too bad that we can not rid ourselves of the lot of them!
Hey! I was gonna post vitriolic profanity.
Sounds to me like the US gov't is trying to claim the problem as their own.
Okay, then, you own it!
they do a lawsuit against a state which passed a law lawfully which enforces fed law
yet they drop charges against black racists standing outside a voting station.
will the GOP mention this and get some balls for once?
Kennedy, actually - DEMS blame him for the deciding vote in the Citizens United case.
FYI: Kennedy supposedly has told friends that he won't retire until Obama is gone ...
If only the feds can screw around with federal law, and if Obama goes down the road of cutting off state funding as has been hinted at, because the state will not get in line, then some judge somewhere, better have the sack to declare that every one of these sanctuary cities and states must also lose federal funding, because they are usurping federal authority as well.
Where are the lawsuits against Chicago and L.A.? They made their own laws regarding immigration policy, and those laws are CONTRARY to federal law, whereas the AZ law is just a mirror of federal law.
It boggles the mind.
i guess the States don't have to enforce all the federal drug laws anymore then... do they???
According to Joe DiGenova [former US Attorney for DC], injunctions are rarely issued in this type of case. The law is presumed to be valid until it is ultimately litigated. If an injunction is granted, it can be appealed all the way up the chain to SCOTUS immediately and can be stayed.
Then, I presume, any state law that requires enforcement of a federal law will be null and void ...
AZ had a bill in its legislature this year - don't know current status ...
So the Obama regime has taken the side of Mexico against a US state? They are trying to destroy this country from the inside, and I hope the judicial branch slaps them down heavily for it.
And I hope Texas joins any countersuit...how about it, Gov. Slickhair?
from link
--The letter signed by Tiahrt to Sen. Sessions states:
"It has come to our attention that Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan played a key role in authorizing the brief. According to a supplemental document she submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ms. Kagan indicated that it was she who, on April 12, 2010, recommended the government take the position that the Arizona law is pre-empted by Federal law.
"Though the final brief was submitted after Ms. Kagan had resigned her position as Solicitor General and does not include her signature, it is clear that she ultimately approved the position taken by those who authored the brief. Because this case could likely be heard by the Supreme Court, it is imperative that we know the extent of Ms. Kagan’s involvement in writing the brief, as well as the rationale behind her direct contravention of the letter of the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.