Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaida Terror: This Time, Africa
IBD Editorials ^ | January 12, 2010 | Investors Business Daily staff

Posted on 07/12/2010 5:49:16 PM PDT by Kaslin

Terrorism: Sadly, Spain's World Cup triumph was marred by a Somali terror strike on Uganda. It brought back memories of how Spain fled Iraq after al-Qaida's attack in 2004 — a response Africa shouldn't repeat.

The bombings that killed 74 soccer fans watching the World Cup championship between Spain and the Netherlands on Sunday night had all the earmarks of a classic al-Qaida operation: They targeted large crowds of bystanders; the victims were multinational, with Irish, Indian, American, Ethiopian, Eritrean and Ugandan nationals among the dead; the blasts occurred almost simultaneously in two places; and it happened on a date ending in 11.

The attacks also signaled another al-Qaida junior partner in terrorism — al-Shabab of Somalia, whose ties to al-Qaida are similar to Jemaah Islamiyah in Indonesia or the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Al-Shabab, which claimed "credit" for the suicide attacks, already controls a third of Somalia's land and has ambitions of conquering all of it. African Union troops, which support the weak Somali government, are all that stands in their way.

"Al-Shabab was behind the blasts," said Ali Mohamud Rage, the terrorist gang's spokesman. "Thanks to our martyrs who carried out the attacks."

Al-Shabab had at least two motives for Sunday's attack: its Talibanic hatred of soccer, music, drinking and all "unnecessary fun," and the gang's political goal of driving Uganda's African Union troops out of Somalia so that al-Shabab can take over. Uganda has an election soon, and al-Shabab wants to use terror to drive Ugandans to elect someone who'll remove Uganda's peacekeepers from Somalia.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alshabaab; alshabab; globaljihad; jihad

1 posted on 07/12/2010 5:49:17 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Had a loading issue with the link, does anyone know how many Americans were just killed in this “man-caused disaster”?

2 posted on 07/12/2010 5:58:01 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Gone Galt and loving it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

I heard one.

3 posted on 07/12/2010 6:00:56 PM PDT by goodnesswins (DEMOCRATS LOSE.....America WINS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Talibanic hatred of soccer, music, drinking and all "unnecessary fun,"

That would go well with Talibanic love of boredom, silence, sobriety and "necessary fun", like blowin' people up.

4 posted on 07/12/2010 6:06:31 PM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has it limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

At this point, one American dead. Nat Henn, native of Wilmington, DE, had been living in CA. He was an worker for Invisible Children, a religous-based aid group.

5 posted on 07/12/2010 6:14:22 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Gone Galt and loving it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Hahahahahaha! Aren’t these fun-loving mooslims a blast? Maybe the one thing in scienve they can feel better about (listen up NASA) is their making of bombs to blow innocents into a bloody pulp. Oh, you mooslims.

6 posted on 07/12/2010 6:38:02 PM PDT by hal ogen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

background link:

7 posted on 07/12/2010 7:10:26 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The following text is a quote:

Home • Briefing Room • Speeches & Remarks

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release July 14, 2010
Background Briefing by Senior Administration Officials on Al Shabaab Terrorist Organization

Via Conference Call

5:24 P.M. EDT

MR. HAMMER: As we mentioned, we’re doing a call on background with senior administration officials on the Al Shabaab terrorist group. I’m going to turn it over to our senior administration official number one to make some introductory remarks. And then we’ll open it up for your questions.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for being with us. First of all, I think as you’re all aware, Al Shabaab has claimed responsibility for what can only be termed as a heinous and cowardly terrorist act that claimed the lives of I think about 76 individuals, most of them Ugandans, innocents, at these two sites, but also claimed the life of one American and injured five others.

This is certainly in keeping with Al Shabaab’s threats that it has made, as well as its history of attacking innocents. And at this point, there are indications that Al Shabaab was indeed responsible for it and that its claim of responsibility is real.

The President has reached out to President Museveni offering support and all assistance. The FBI has sent a team there to help with the crime scene. We are making whatever assistance available to the Ugandan government as they deal with the aftermath of this attack. We’ve also made sure that other countries in the region understand that the United States stands with them against these types of attacks that are carried out by groups such as Al Shabaab.

Now, just a little bit of background on Al Shabaab and what we’re doing. This is something that we have been focused on for quite some time. Al Shabaab is an organization that was formed in 2006, and since that time, it has threatened the United States as well as carried out a number of violent acts inside of Somalia. This would be, though, the first terrorist operation that Al Shabaab carried out outside of Somalia.

But its history is a bloody one. And it is dedicated to the perpetration of violence in order to achieve its ends. As you know, Somalia is a war-torn country and Al Shabaab is one of the groups engaging in activities in Somalia in order to advance its interests and its presence. It engages in regular activities against other Somalis. It has this domestic agenda that is designed to increase its presence, its reach, its influence throughout the country. And it is dedicated to the overthrow of the recognized government of Somalia, the Transitional Federal Government.

Al Shabaab has what I’d refer to as a dual persona. In one respect, they are engaged in a domestic fight in order to advance their political agenda, but they do use terrorist tactics and exceptionally violent means to advance their agenda inside of Somalia.

At the same time, there are a number of individuals within the Al Shabaab organization that have close links with al Qaeda. And I would say that Al Shabaab is a group that is associated with al Qaeda and that these links between the organizations have existed for quite some time. Its agenda is very similar to al Qaeda’s agenda. It advances a distorted and perverted version of Islamic goals and agenda. It has engaged in terrorist tactics inside of Somalia extensively. It is responsible for the assassination of a number of Somali peace activists, international aid workers, numerous civil society figures, as well as journalists.

They are engaged right now in attacks against the African Union peacekeeping troops which are in Mogadishu, the AMISOM mission, which has lost approximately 35 soldiers as part of this peacekeeping mission — it’s been there since 2007.

There are a number of U.S. persons who have traveled to Somalia to join up with Al Shabaab as well as with al Qaeda, and this is something that we’ve watched very closely.

Al Shabaab also has denied the passage of humanitarian assistance to a number of displaced individuals inside of Somalia by preventing access to certain areas and hijacking humanitarian aid and assistance.

Al Shabaab was designated a foreign terrorist organization in 2008, and it was sanctioned, in fact, by the United Nations Security Council earlier this year.

We have taken a number of steps against Al Shabaab, including the President in April of this year issued an executive order, which is 13536 — an executive order that targets those who threaten peace and stability in Somalia and those who interfere with humanitarian assistance there. We have designated an Al Shabaab military commander, frozen the assets of a major Al Shabaab financier, and increased the tools available to support international efforts to weaken this group.

We actively support the AMISOM mission in Somalia with training and supplies, Burundi and Uganda being the major contributing nations, and continue to work with them in support of their efforts to bring security to Somalia and to support the TFG. We’re also providing assistance to refugees and displaced people throughout the country.

So Al Shabaab has a domestic agenda inside of Somalia that is a bloody one. It also has a terrorist agenda that now has manifested itself outside of Somalia, in other countries, and this is something that we are going to work very closely with regional governments to counter.

MR. HAMMER: All right, with that, can we open it up for questions, please?

Q Hi, I actually had two questions. First, I know that the administration’s position in terms of assistance, military assistance to Somalia has been sort of — I believe what the State Department has called a limited involvement militarily. I was wondering if the expansion geographically of the attacks by Al Shabaab just might change that and the U.S. might get more involved or offer more assistance militarily to Somalia, to the Transitional Government?

And also I was wondering if you think that local police departments across the country should be learning more about Al Shabaab? I’m sure they’re well versed in al Qaeda. I’m wondering if they know enough about Al Shabaab.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Okay, on the first question, we are working with regional governments, as I mentioned, working in support of the AMISOM mission there, working also with the TFG. One of the things that we want to make sure that we do now is take stock of the recent developments and the attacks in Kampala, and to take a look and see what it is that we need to do as a result of those attacks.

In the first instance, what we’re trying to do is to lend support to the Ugandan government. But also what we need to do now is to look at the situation in Somalia and to determine if this is now a trend that Al Shabaab is going to be on, and to take all appropriate measures. So there are different mechanisms of support that we can utilize here. But again, this is something that our government is going to be looking very closely at and working with governments in the region on.

Q And what about the locals?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, I think there have been a number of instances over the past year where individuals have left the United States and traveled to Somalia. I think there have been a number of press accounts and reports about individuals who have traveled there. So I don’t think Al Shabaab is an unknown entity to a number of law enforcement organizations in this country. Certainly the FBI has worked on Al Shabaab and has cooperated closely with a number of the local law enforcement entities through the joint terrorism task forces. We’re very vigilant for any indication of individuals from Somalia coming here to the United States to engage in these kinds of extremist and terrorist activities.

So if there is a need for new information to be provided to local law enforcement, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and others will make sure that that gets out into those jurisdictions.

Q But you don’t think locals should take it upon themselves?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Certainly all police departments should be as vigilant and as mindful of the recent developments in terrorism as possible. And so, again, this is something that the FBI will be working with their local partners, again, through the JTTFs, to ensure that they are aware of tactics, trends, terrorist activities and practices that are engaged in by al Qaeda and Shabaab as well as other organizations.

Q Hi. Thank you very much. Can you help us on whether you had any warnings — going back now — have you seen any indications that this was going to happen? Is this something that — you had anticipated Al Shabaab operating outside of its own borders. Do you think that there is any kind of a, dare I say, intelligence failure here in not having anticipated it?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, as I’ve mentioned, Al Shabaab leaders have made public threats against outside interests, including Western interests. There has been over time reporting that indicates that Al Shabaab, because of its association with al Qaeda, may be planning attacks at different locations. To my knowledge, there was no forewarning or reporting that indicated that these attacks were going to be taking place in Kampala. But Al Shabaab, since it was designated a foreign terrorist organization, it was on our radar screen and we were trying to monitor any reports or indications that it was planning to carry out terrorist attacks. But this is something that was, again, perpetrated in a neighboring country, but we didn’t have any advance warning about that attack.

Q And do you think — are there any indications now that others who are in the (inaudible) should be similarly warned? Are there any additional steps that should be taken by some of the other ally partners?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Rest assured that we are working very closely with the countries in the region, our partners, on the intelligence, law enforcement, and security fronts, ensuring that they have the latest information available to us; that we provide them guidance and support as far as what we know about any other types of threats that they need to be vigilant for.

But clearly if this indeed was Al Shabaab making good on its threats to carry out attacks and did this in such a manner against a vulnerable target of innocence, I think clearly other governments in the region will need to make sure that they are able to take the necessary security precautions at this time in light of what happened in Kampala.

Q Earlier today, Ambassador Benjamin implied that the al Qaeda contact that Al Shabaab had, the most direct contact, was al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. I was wondering if you could talk about that relationship. And two, if this tells you even more that al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is becoming more and more of a — when you refer to al Qaeda, is that what you’re referring to rather than necessarily al Qaeda that we know in the Pakistan and Afghanistan region?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think al Qaeda in the region, there are, I would say, maybe two identifiable subcomponents of al Qaeda. One is al Qaeda in East Africa that is responsible for the attacks against our embassies in Addis Ababa and Nairobi in 1998, and then Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. And there is a fair amount of interaction, intersection between AQAP and AQEA. And the Al Shabaab organization and individuals within Al Shabaab have contacts and associations with both al Qaeda in East Africa as well as al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

There are also, I would point out, though, a large number of Somali refugees inside of Yemen, and it is an area that is frequently traversed between Somalia and Yemen, quite a bit of traffic going back and forth there.

So, yes, we are concerned of what we have seen of Al Shabaab contacts and interactions with al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, as well as its more traditional contacts and associations with elements of al Qaeda in East Africa. And there is somewhat of a blending together of these different individuals who are at the top of these organizations. And, unfortunately, I think they are bringing along with them some of the young Somalis and others who are engaged in these local conflicts but are brought into the al Qaeda orbit.

Q Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula — I mean, it seems as if more terrorist attacks are getting connected in some form or another to them than any other al Qaeda affiliate. I mean, in your mind, is this becoming the focus of when we hear the words al Qaeda, that this is who we’re dealing with these days?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is probably the most operationally active of the al Qaeda franchises in the region, in Yemen, and the peninsula — Arabian Peninsula, as well as in the Horn of Africa, as well as setting its sights beyond that area. So, yes, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is one of the al Qaeda elements that I am most concerned about. And its involvement in the Horn and its interaction with Al Shabaab elements is of strong concern.

Q Thanks for doing this. A recent assessment by a policy analyst over at Council on Foreign Relations, Bronwyn Bruton, said that the U.S. was in effectively a self-imposed stalemate with regard to options for how to deal with the situation in Somalia and Al Shabaab. Can you talk a little bit more about what you think the way forward is here? There have been any number of reports of those arms that the U.S. does send in ending up in Al Shabaab’s possession thanks to corruption and black market trafficking. How much margin for maneuver does the U.S. really have to counteract or limit Al Shabaab’s activities?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, I think if you look at that portion of Somalia, there are two elements or forces that are trying to stabilize the situation there. There’s AMISOM and the Transitional Federal Government. Al Shabaab is a destabilizing force. And what we need to do is to ensure that we’re able build up the capabilities of AMISOM as well as the TFG. At the same time, we’re very concerned about Al Shabaab’s capabilities and what it is doing in the area, what it is doing vis-à-vis preventing, again, this humanitarian assistance in there.

Somalia is a complicated and challenging environment and one that the United States is looking at the different actors and proceeding appropriately as far as the policies that we’re going to pursue. But this is something that is going to take years to address because the problems that affect the country are systemic, structural. And what we’re trying to do is, working with the TFG and AMISOM, is to bring and to broaden the area of Mogadishu and of that portion of Somalia so that there can be a stabilization situation, so that additional assistance can get into the country, and that further progress can be made against those forces of instability including Al Shabaab, as well as the pirates along the coast.

Q Thanks. Let me just follow quickly, there are also reports of associations in the past between Al Shabaab and some other groups in the region, directly with Hezbollah — some 700 fighters going from Somalia to Lebanon — and then indirectly through Hezbollah to Iran and Syria. Is that a significant part of what you worry about with Al Shabaab? Or was that sort of a one-off thing?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think they’re concerned about Al Shabaab making associations with a variety of organizations — not just al Qaeda, but others — as they look for assistance and support, whether it be weapons, arms, money. These are things that I think we’re taking into account right now in trying to design policies to counter that, again, working with those elements like AMISOM and the TFG.

Q Thanks, very much.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Just to return to this point about the Council on Foreign Relations analysis, I think it’s also important to recognize that it’s not as if Al Shabaab is some kind of well-loved force in Somalia. It’s an organization notorious for its treatment of civilians and of the Somalia people. So I just want to make sure one doesn’t inadvertently paint a picture of a — this incredibly strong organization that’s got control and popular support.

As we all know, in Somalia one of the big challenges is the absence of functioning and effective entities that can provide security. So it’s sometimes easy I think to view Shabaab as perhaps stronger in the Somalia context than it necessarily is. It’s just operating in a place where normal structures are so very broken.

But some of that same analysis, as the Council sort of suggests that the right answer is some kind of I think they call it constructive disengagement and sort of a pulling back from the problem. And I think that what we’ve seen in Kampala is a good example of why that’s not a viable way forward.

Q Okay, thanks.

Q A couple of questions about this. I’m wondering, in light of the belief now that the attack — if it wasn’t a dry run, it emboldened AQAP to try to the Christmas bombing. Do you see the Uganda bombing as — since it’s the first external operation by Al Shabaab outside of Somalia, do you see that as a worrisome sign that maybe these guys are capable of launching some kind of attack inside the U.S.? And I have a follow-up.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, certainly, I think it demonstrates their willingness to make good on their threats to carry out attacks. It’s clearly — clear that they were directed into Uganda because of Uganda’s sort of role in AMISOM. But there is a concern that Al Shabaab might be trying to carry out attacks or similar types of attacks in other venues, so — and this is something that we have to maintain our vigilance.

Q But would you extend that — do you think they’re capable of doing it here, possibly? Are you worried about that?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I’m worried about any organization, particularly any one that is associated with al Qaeda and has al Qaeda elements sprinkled within it, and their determination as well potential capability to carry out an attack outside of the region, as was demonstrated by what happened on Christmas Day, as you point out.

There are ways that they can carry out relatively unsophisticated attacks, but still with very lethal results. So again, Al Shabaab has been on our radar screen for a while. They’re a group of murderous thugs that direct that organization. A lot of that is directed to the Somali people — against the African people in a manner that is just totally reprehensible and something that I think the African people find deplorable.

At the same time, what we need to do is make sure that we’re vigilant here in the States, as well as in other places.

Q If I could just ask about there is a defendant who walked out of court in Alexandria federal court a couple of weeks ago named Anthony Joseph Tracy — he had been an ICE agent — or an asset of some sort for ICE and also DOD and an intelligence agency, according to the court transcript. There was some concern that he had flunked a polygraph test about smuggling in Somalis into the U.S. or helping to smuggle some through Cuba, and that apparently he flunked on the issue of whether or not he had assisted Shabaab in getting some of their people in. Do you have any lingering concern that Mr. Tracy might have helped facilitate some Shabaab operatives or fighters to getting into the U.S.?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I’m not going to talk about any specific case, but I will say that I am concerned about the different types of attempts and smuggling routes that have been used by Somalis to flee that area, including to the West and here to this hemisphere, and whether or not Al Shabaab has tried to exploit those for its own purposes.

Q Thank you very much. I came to sort of delve deeper into the relationship between the different elements and aspects of al Qaeda and this group in terms of fundraising, in terms of exchange of money and exchange of arms or flow of arms. Have you seen an uptick between the different aspects of al Qaeda and this group in terms of these aspects?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: There’s a lot of activity that goes on in that part of the world that is outside of normal channels and a lot of things that are done through personal connections and contacts. And given that there is a relative lack of government structures in place in that part of the world, a lot of illicit activity can go on. And I believe al Qaeda and other groups such as Al Shabaab take advantage of that.

Again, I point out the concern about the increasing activity of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula that goes beyond Yemen; it reaches out into the Horn. And so the activities of Al Shabaab, al Qaeda, I think sort of run the gamut of different types of activities, including the movement of contraband as well as different types of fundraising activities that allow them to carry on with their agendas.

MR. HAMMER: All right, thank you very much, everybody, for joining us this afternoon. Just a reminder, this was on background as senior administration officials. And enjoy the rest of your day.

5:50 P.M. EDT

8 posted on 07/14/2010 7:08:35 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The following text is a quote:

Home • Briefing Room • Speeches & Remarks

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release July 14, 2010

Interview of the President by South African Broadcasting Corporation

Diplomatic Reception Room

July 13, 2010
3:45 P.M. EDT

Q Mr. President, you reached out yesterday to President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda, pledging U.S. support after the twin bombings in Kampala. Can you share some of the details of that conversation with us?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I expressed, obviously most immediately, the condolences of the American people for this horrific crime that had been committed. And I told the President that the United States was going to be fully supportive of a thorough investigation of what had happened.

Al Shabaab has now taken credit, taken responsibility for this atrocity, and we are going to redouble our efforts, working with Uganda, working with the African Union, to make sure that organizations like this are not able to kill Africans with impunity.

And it was so tragic and ironic to see an explosion like this take place when people in Africa were celebrating and watching the World Cup take place in South Africa. On the one hand, you have a vision of an Africa on the move, an Africa that is unified, an Africa that is modernizing and creating opportunities; and on the other hand, you’ve got a vision of al Qaeda and Al Shabaab that is about destruction and death. And I think it presents a pretty clear contrast in terms of the future that most Africans want for themselves and their children. And we need to make sure that we are doing everything we can to support those who want to build, as opposed to want to destroy.

Q These attacks are very much about what is happening in Somalia today. How does that change, if at all, the game plan of the United States with regard to the Transitional Government that is in power there?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, look, obviously Somalia has gone through a generation now of war, of conflict. The Transitional Government there is still getting its footing. But what we know is that if Al Shabaab takes more and more control within Somalia, that it is going to be exporting violence the way it just did in Uganda. And so we’ve got to have a multinational effort. This is not something that the United States should do alone, that Uganda or others should do alone, but rather the African Union, in its mission in Somalia, working with the Transitional Government to try to stabilize the situation and start putting that country on a pathway that provides opportunity for people, as opposed to creating a breeding ground for terrorism.

Q Former U.S. Ambassador to Tanzania — you might know him — Charles Stith — has just written a piece about radical Islam in Africa specifically, and I’d like to quote something from it. He says, “It became clear to me that the dirty little secret that no one wanted to discuss openly was political Islam’s corrosive effect and adverse impact on development and stability on the African continent. It is inarguable that Islam is a factor in Africa.”

In your view, are there strategies in place to deal with this?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think — look, Islam is a great religion. It is one that has prospered side by side with other religions within Africa. And one of the great strengths of Africa is its diversity not only of faith, but of races and ethnicities. But what you have seen in terms of radical Islam is an approach that says that any efforts to modernize, any efforts to provide basic human rights, any efforts to democratize are somehow anti-Islam. And I think that is absolutely wrong. I think the vast majority of people of the Islamic faith reject that. I think the people of Africa reject it.

And what you’ve seen in some of the statements that have been made by these terrorist organizations is that they do not regard African life as valuable in and of itself. They see it as a potential place where you can carry out ideological battles that kill innocents without regard to long-term consequences for their short-term tactical gains.

And that’s why it’s so important, even as we deal with organizations like Al Shabaab militarily, that, more importantly, we also are dealing with the development agenda and building on models of countries like South Africa that are trying to move in the right direction, that have successful entrepreneurs, that have democracy and have basic human freedoms — that we highlight those as an example whereby Africans can seize their own destiny, and hopefully the United States can be an effective partner in that.

Q So this is a link to poverty, that’s what you’re saying.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, it’s not just link to poverty. I mean, I think there’s an ideological component to it that also has to be rejected. There’s — obviously young people, if they don’t have opportunity, are more vulnerable to these misguided ideologies, but we also have to directly confront the fact that issues like a anti-democratic, anti-free speech, anti-freedom of religion agenda, which is what an organization like Al Shabaab promotes, also often goes hand in hand with violence.

Q Sudan. The International Criminal Court has added the charges of genocide to the arrest warrant of Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir. There’s a view in Africa, certainly with the African Union, that the pursuit of President Bashir will be undermining or detrimental to the Doha peace process. What’s your view?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, my view is that the ICC has put forward an arrest warrant. We think that it is important for the government of Sudan to cooperate with the ICC. We think that it is also important that people are held accountable for the actions that took place in Darfur that resulted in, at minimum, hundreds of thousands of lives being lost.

And so there has to be accountability, there has to be transparency. Obviously we are active in trying to make sure that Sudan is stabilized; that humanitarian aid continues to go in there; that efforts with respect to a referendum and the possibility of Southern Sudan gaining independence under the agreement that was brokered, that that moves forward.

So it is a balance that has to be struck. We want to move forward in a constructive fashion in Sudan, but we also think that there has to be accountability, and so we are fully supportive of the ICC.

Q Is peace not at risk if he were to present himself to the ICC?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think that peace is at risk if there’s no transparency and accountability of the actions that are taking place, whether it’s in Sudan or anywhere else in the world.

Q The World Cup, Mr. President, you mentioned that. To a certain extent, I imagine around the world, it was overshadowed by what happened in Uganda. But South Africa was basking in the glory of having successfully hosted this World Cup. But let’s acknowledge the skeptics — and there were quite a few of them and they were quite loud. I wonder if you were one of them.

THE PRESIDENT: No, I wasn’t. I, having visited South Africa and seen the extraordinary vitality of the people there, having gotten to know President Zuma and understanding the extraordinary pride that his administration expressed, which I think was a pride that was shared by all South Africans, I had confidence that this was going to be a success.

Obviously, it was just a terrific showcase, not just for South Africa, but for Africa as a whole, because what it lifted up was the fact that Africa — all the stereotypes that it suffers under, all the false perspectives about Africa capacity, that when given an opportunity, Africa is a continent full of leaders, entrepreneurs, governments that can operate effectively. What we now have to do is build on that positive image that comes out of the World Cup.

And when I was in Ghana last year, I was very clear on what I think the agenda has to be — Africa for Africans. That means that we can be partners with Africans, but ultimately, on whether it’s issues of eliminating corruption, ensuring smooth transitions of democratic governments, making sure that businesses are able to thrive and prosper and that markets are working for the smallest farmer and not just the most well-connected person — those are issues that Africans can work on together.

And in terms of my orientation working to help in Africa’s development, we want to provide resources, but we want to partner with those who are interested in growing their own capacity over time and not having a long-term dependency on foreign aid.

Q You also spoke in Ghana about the need to stop the blame game.

THE PRESIDENT: Absolutely. Well, look, I feel very strongly that — you talk to the average person in Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria; they will acknowledge a tragic history in terms of colonialism and negative Western influences. But I think what they’ll also acknowledge is their biggest problem right now is the policeman who’s shaking them down, or the inability for them to be able to get a telephone in a timely fashion in their office, or having to pay a bribe. Those are the impediments to development right now. And those are things that Africans can solve if there is a determination and there’s strong leadership. And Nelson Mandela set us on a path in understanding the standards of leadership that are needed, and I think those standards can be met. And you’re seeing countries around the continent who are starting to meet those high standards that are so necessary to ultimately help the people.

Q I want to talk about President — former President Nelson Mandela in a second, but before that, let’s just touch on this bid, the U.S. bid for the World Cup in 2018 or 2022. How serious are Americans about soccer? My sense is that they’re feeling fairly partial to it.

THE PRESIDENT: Oh, listen, I think that you saw a quantum leap this year because of the excellence of the U.S. team. It’s absolutely true that they call baseball the national pastime here in the United States; that basketball is obviously a homegrown invention; and we dominate American football. Those are all sports that developed here and that the United States is obsessed with.

Soccer is a late entry. But what you saw with the U.S. team was huge enthusiasm of the sort that I haven’t seen about soccer before. And the younger generation is much more focused on soccer than the older generation. I mean, my daughters, they play soccer, they paid attention to who was doing what in the World Cup. And so I think what you’re going to continue to see is a growing enthusiasm and I think people are very serious about the World Cup being hosted here in the United States.

Q I want to touch on AIDS. Mr. President, there’s been a great deal of appreciation and goodwill towards the United States for the Global Health Initiative, of which PEPFAR is the cornerstone. Some criticism, though, from AIDS groups in South Africa that there’s a de facto decrease in funding, even though there’s a 2.3 percent increase. How do you respond to that? It’s based on inflation. Inflation in developing countries tends to be higher than it is in the United States. It’s a 2.3 percent increase, and they’re saying it’s a de facto decrease.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I have to say that we are seeing not a decrease, but an increase in PEPFAR, an increase in the Global Health Initiative. And I promise you when I’m fighting for that budget here in the United States, people don’t see it as a decrease. They see it as an increase. They understand we’re putting more money into it, and it’s the right thing to do.

What we do want to make sure of is that as successful as PEPFAR has been, as important as it is for us to, for example, get antiviral drugs in there, that we’re also helping to build up capacity — consistent with what I said earlier.

So, for example, what are we doing in terms of creating public health systems and infrastructure in a place like South Africa so that the incidents of infection are reduced? We’re not just treating the disease itself, but we’re also doing a much better job in terms of general public health so that fewer people are getting infected in the first place.

I think that kind of reorientation you’re going to start seeing in some areas. We’ll continue to provide increases in antiviral drugs, continue to provide millions of rand, billions of U.S. dollars to basis assistance, but we also want to build capacity at the same time.

Q Final question, Mr. President. Nelson Mandela will be 92 on Sunday. Your thoughts?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, he looked terrific, first of all.

Q Didn’t he?

THE PRESIDENT: And when I spoke to him on the phone after the tragic loss of his granddaughter, he sounded as clear and charming as he always has been.

And he continues to be a model of leadership not just for South Africa, but for the world. So we celebrate him here in the United States, as you do in South Africa. We wish him all the best. And we are constantly reminded that his legacy of seeing every person as important, and not making distinctions based on race or class but the degree to which they are people of character — that’s a good guidepost for how all of us should operate as leaders.

And so I wish him all the best. And South Africa continues, I think, to be blessed by not just a national treasure but a world treasure.

Q Well, South Africans wish you best. Thank you very much. Very good to meet you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. I enjoyed it.

4:00 P.M. EDT

9 posted on 07/14/2010 7:11:19 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

I’m amazed the Nicads lasted that long in the teleprompter.

10 posted on 07/14/2010 7:14:54 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson