Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Clinton back in the White House, holds economic meeting with Obama (Follow the $$$$)
Washington Post ^ | July 14, 2010 | Anne E. Kornblut

Posted on 07/14/2010 3:17:28 PM PDT by maggief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Brilliant

you’re right. clintin doesn’t know squat. obama has no experts. They are all flying by the seat of their pants. their drive is to destroy this country...period.


41 posted on 07/14/2010 9:12:58 PM PDT by cubreporter ( Trust Rush and you won't go wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
But the dot com bubble wasn’t enough to fuel that economy. The dot coms were a small part of the economy.

The tech boom was more than just the dot coms. It was the advent of E-commerce and Y2K too. The latter was a multi-billion dollar stimulus all by itself.

The proof is that as soon as oil prices began to rise, the dot com bubble burst.

I didn't need to monitor the oil prices to know that the COBOL programmers hired for Y2K would be let go when January 1, 2000 came and went.

And I don't dispute that low oil prices will help the economy. I just don't accept that E-commerce, Y2K, or on-line news forums such as FreeRepublic wouldn't have happened without low oil prices.

42 posted on 07/15/2010 1:58:33 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

Well, we weren’t talking about the tech boom in general. We were talking about the dot coms. However, even the entire tech boom was not in my opinion a bigger factor than the cheap oil. There is no question that the sector would have expanded without the oil. But to say that was driving the entire economy is another thing altogether.


43 posted on 07/15/2010 4:38:04 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

We’ll have to agree to disagree, then.:)


44 posted on 07/15/2010 4:42:11 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson