Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hayworth takes his best shot at McCain in new TV ad
The Hill ^ | 7.23.10 | Sean Miller

Posted on 07/23/2010 11:02:16 AM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: Paperdoll

Hey, there you go!


41 posted on 07/23/2010 12:20:03 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Absolutely. Not to mention his repulsive leftwing Reform Institute.


42 posted on 07/23/2010 12:21:59 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I wasn’t alive in 1920 (although you act as if you were), but I’m not too sure that “America functioned just fine” before then. That’s merely recognizing that the problems America faced during that period cannot be swept under a rug, especially by some proto-Neanderthal who doesn’t think that women should be allowed to vote.


43 posted on 07/23/2010 12:28:35 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You support the ERA too?


44 posted on 07/23/2010 12:31:59 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant

[pissant shakes his cane in the air]


45 posted on 07/23/2010 12:33:45 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I’ll take that as a yes. Thank God the wonderful Phyllis Schlafly led the fight to kill it.


46 posted on 07/23/2010 12:38:00 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Wrong again, old man.


47 posted on 07/23/2010 12:39:12 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
I only whis Hayworth had done this earlier. When he was only down by 7 points hitting hard looks like just bare knuckle politics. But now the polls are showing him way down and hitting hard smacks of desperation. This needed to be said and I'm glad JD said it, but I do wish he had done so a month ago.
The GOP has to have 41 non-RINO seats in the Senate after November if they want to keep Obama stopped. Keeping the RINOs from jumping ship will be a lot easier if they know that even if they switch sides they will just get filibustered anyway. At the moment there are 5 mega RINOs in the Senate, Grahm, Collins, Snowe, Brown and McCain. There is nothing we can do about the first four, they aren't up for election. We are likely to pick up six or seven seats in November, but one, Kirk from Illinois, is also a turbo RINO and can't be counted on. Removing McCain reduces the number of RINOs by one and may make all the difference come next January.
48 posted on 07/23/2010 12:43:00 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Oh, so you don’t support the ERA? Why you are an unelightened neanderthal not wanting women’s equality etched into the constitution. Hells bells, even such GOP luminaries as Howard Baker and Dick Nixon. It had a real shot at passing too. But Schlafly and a few neanderthals lobbied very successfully, to the point where even some states that initially passed it rescinded it.


49 posted on 07/23/2010 12:47:18 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pissant

That’s what funny about you: I remind you that the Founders allowed for constitutional amendments, and you think that makes me favor the ERA. Your brain is logic-free.


50 posted on 07/23/2010 12:49:26 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I asked you and you didn’t answer. Now I know you don’t. SO there is some discernment you have regarding “rights” and “equality” and gender bias, etc. and for what purposes an amendment to the constitution should be used for. Next thing you know, you’ll be wanting women to be forbidden from driving.

Funny, this is just like me and my opinion of the 19th (and other) amendments.


51 posted on 07/23/2010 12:56:46 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

John McCain deserves to be re-elected Senator as much as Jeffrey Damler deserves to be named “Chef of the Century”.


52 posted on 07/23/2010 1:00:16 PM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No, it is not. I haven’t even read the text of the ERA, so I am not “discerning” or distinguishing anything. You just wish I was in order to support your argument.


53 posted on 07/23/2010 1:00:29 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

OK. So you are ignorant about the ERA, which came within a whisker to becoming part of our constitution. All the RINOs at the time (and all the dems of course) were singing its praises.

Thank GOD for the neanderthals like Schlafly, Goldwater, and RONALD REAGAN!!

Did you know that only 8 US senators voted against it (one was a dem)? That support for the ERA was in the GOP platform? (Reagan changed that).

And did you know it has been re-introduced in Congress?

The PC claptrappers are alive and well. Just as they were in the 1970s and the early part of the last century.


54 posted on 07/23/2010 1:11:34 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

ROFL!


55 posted on 07/23/2010 1:16:10 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pissant
You still don't get it: you are using the ERA as a red herring. Just because I am in favor of a woman's right to vote, I am not in favor of an amendment I haven't read.

Much like being strongly in favor of the 2nd Amendment does not make me in favor of Prohibition. Your inability to recognize the above stems from your logical failure--"some Amendments are bad therefore other Amendments are bad." In your case, you feel that the 19th Amendment is bad because the 18th is bad. One has nothing to do with the other.

56 posted on 07/23/2010 1:19:33 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pissant

a little late to make a difference.

what could hayworth do for a ten point shift into his favor?


57 posted on 07/23/2010 1:25:06 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

IOW

vote democrat because republicans will starve children by taking unemployment.

(just end it already, give everyone unemployment even if they have a job.)


58 posted on 07/23/2010 1:27:03 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I’ll try one more time - please read it slowly. Try to comprehend.

The only relationship between the 18A and 19A that I mentioned was that I used the 18A as ANOTHER example of a bad amendment. There is NO CAUSAL relationship between the two. No ‘If then therefore’ relationship; no AND or exclusive OR operators.

Just a simple example to blow away your flawed logic that since Amendments were allowed by the Founders, that future Amendments would therefore be beneficial.

Obviously, not all are. And the ERA, which nearly became one - which you are ignorant about - was just more PC claptrap, like the 19A.


59 posted on 07/23/2010 1:50:40 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Just a simple example to blow away your flawed logic that since Amendments were allowed by the Founders, that future Amendments would therefore be beneficial.

Except for the fact that the above was never my argument, and that it is a tortuous fabrication on your part, it is an example of something. I submit, idiocy.

60 posted on 07/23/2010 1:59:03 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson