Ten Questions for freshly-zotted PDS trolls

Cogitamus (a real stinker of a liberal blog that this troll failed to link to)

[4everfree2001]

Ten question for lame Palin trolls:

1) Do you always roll in MSM anti-Palin propaganda like a dog on a fresh meadow muffin?

2) Is your IQ really lower than your hat size?

3) Do you think barfing up nonsense like this will get you lucky with dippy hippy chicks?

4) Did that zot leave a mark?

5-10) You ain't worth the effort to come up with a full top ten list, adios, troll-breath.

[Clyde5445]

It’s a start.

Maybe the Mods will pull this thread on grounds of common decency

[4everfree2001]

Thanks for your contribution!

[Lakeshark]

That wasn't nearly long enough to tell us how you really feel.

Could you expand on that a little?

:-)

[headsonpikes]

Crotch-sniffer placemarker.

[dead]

I am not a liberal. This is relevant because it reflects on her judgement and her “family values,” WHICH SHE HAS MADE A MAJOR PLANK OF HER PLATFORM.

Can you please provide a link to this platform?

Seriously important capitalization not withstanding, I've never heard about it before.

[Robbin]

After all those attacks on a woman’s perosnal reproductive choices, I have a question for you... Would you have been upset if she chose to ABORT the child?

The answer to your question is, yes, Sarah Palin is my idea of an outstanding mother, Pro-Life champion and an outstanding example of Family values.

Now how about answer my question....

[GoCards]

Try spewing your hatred somewhere else.

[Jemian]

I answered your question. You didn’t address the issue as to why you’re bringing this up now. The fact is that Sarah Palin did make those choices. You don’t like her and you are seizing on this to discredit here.

Even if she had chosen differently, Trig would still have the extra chromosome in every cell of his body. That was determined at conception and nothing that Sarah has chosen since has changed that in the slightest.

This is a stupid argument raised by someone who has no substantive issues to present.

[fml]

Mine broke and my son wasn’t born for two more weeks. It’s fascinating how life goes on even when one is too dumb to understand.

[lula]

One important fact you left out, Sarah’s FAITH! It’s the reason for the choices she made. If you had any you would understand.

[jellybean]

She brought her baby to the convention and held him up to the cameras. She has made him an explicit part of her platform.

Yes, it would have been much better for her to hide him in a closet. That way she could have spared you getting your panties in a bunch. She's so thoughtless!

[2ndDivisionVet]

Git 'er done, Mods!!

[BufordP]

Sarah Palin is a momma grizzly and momma grizzlies can kill a man. So I don't see how all those things you mention would adversely affect a BIG BROWN BEAR!

[4everfree2001]

Yes, I would have been upset and would not have supporter her. I am pro-life.

I am not saying she should have aborted the child (I don’t know where you all got this), she should have gone to a hospital as soon as was responsible and medically prudent.

[Admin Moderator]

I am not a liberal.

Nah, you just post this drivel from a liberal blog and expect us to believe that. Buh-bye.

[FateAmenableToChange]

This response is typical. Nothing to address the issues raised in the post; only attacking the motivations of the poster.

Where are you getting your supposed facts from? Looking through the list, all I see is the plaintiffs' complaint version in which, even if there is a grain of truth to any of your questions, they are filtered and adjusted through your lens of clear animus toward Palin.

Moreover, your questions even to a lobotomized user of the Daily Kos or reader of the DU (in small words that means a person possessing an IQ approaching that of a carrot) are based upon an improper juxtaposition of the subjective and the objective. You seek, through slanted presentations of facts, to convince your reader to emotionally agree with your b.s. point of view as if it were the only choice that a reasonable person could make. Yet, as any truly reasonable person knows, individual actions depend upon an infinite number of inputs going on in real time and under the fog of bounded rationality. You weren't there, you aren't Sarah Palin. You are, however, behaving foolishly and contemptuously.

Finally, the trollishness of your post comes out in the last line, which I have quoted. You made a clear ad hominem attack on Palin that, unless you are an imbecile, you would have known would indicate to others that you have no reasonable interest in actual debate. And then you have the audacity to act surprised and indignant when people call you on your trollishness. Trolls are not worth the debate. Enjoy your time with the viking kitties.

[jellybean]

I like your list better!!

BTW, I missed the IBTZ by >< much! :(

[Admin Moderator]

Already roadkilled, thanks.

[MNJohnnie]

In politics, what you are engaging in is called a whisper campaign. It consisted of making up fraudulent accusation about your foe hoping that the lies sticks to them with voters or to causes them to have to spend their time and money defending themselves against your lies.

It is an utterly despicable form of campaigning. It practitioners should be exposed and politically destroyed when ever found.

Next time make a rational, fact based argument instead of engaging in this sort of gutter slime personal attack politics and you will treated with courtesy. Fail to do that and you will continue to be treated like the despicable idiot you apparently are.