Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California's gay marriage
KGUN9 TV, Tucson, AZ ^ | 8-5-2010 | KGUN9 TV, Tucson, AZ

Posted on 08/05/2010 11:31:51 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG

KGUN 9 POLL: Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California's gay marriage ban? Yes No Undecided

(Excerpt) Read more at kgun9.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; downourthroats; gayagenda; gayjudge; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; inourfaces; lavendermafia; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California's gay marriage ban?

Thank you for participating in our poll. Here are the results so far:

Yes  31%
No  54%
Undecided  15%

Poll is here part way down on the left.

 

1 posted on 08/05/2010 11:31:53 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

Changed a bit.

Yes
17%
No
77%
Undecided


2 posted on 08/05/2010 11:33:57 AM PDT by edcoil (Truth's commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

no @ 82% now


3 posted on 08/05/2010 11:34:15 AM PDT by EmilyGeiger (Psalm 33:12 "Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG
Regardless of the subject matter, I find it frightening that ONE PERSON, can usurp the will of The People of California....twice!

To have someone endowed with this much power is preposterous.

4 posted on 08/05/2010 11:35:52 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

KGUN 9 POLL
Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California’s gay marriage ban?

Thank you for participating in our poll. Here are the results so far:
Yes

6%
No

91%
Undecided

3%
Most Popular


5 posted on 08/05/2010 11:36:03 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Must have just started 12-88


6 posted on 08/05/2010 11:36:15 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

It takes a special kind of stupid to take the time to answer an online poll “undecided.”


7 posted on 08/05/2010 11:36:45 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan
It takes a special kind of stupid to take the time to answer an online poll “undecided.”

I am not sure how I feel about your statement. :-)

8 posted on 08/05/2010 11:38:26 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

One judge trumps seven million adult voters? And someone thinks that’s OK? Stunning.


9 posted on 08/05/2010 11:38:39 AM PDT by GOPJ (Asked for ZIP? Give 82224 - Lost Springs,Wy - most sparsely populated in country. Freeper:SamAdams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG
7,000,000 voters disenfranchised by one judge. Who, incidently, is also gay.

I'm sure that didn't influence his decision at all. Not like he was a Christian or conservative, after all. /sarc

Prop. 8 judge strikes down same-sex marriage ban

10 posted on 08/05/2010 11:38:39 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

Yes 5%
No 93%
UD 2%

The people speak again, fat lot of good that it does us.


11 posted on 08/05/2010 11:39:40 AM PDT by CaptainPhilFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Seemed high on the undecided when saw it. It was an personal opinion piece on “My life as a gay judge” not a legal opinion.


12 posted on 08/05/2010 11:39:42 AM PDT by edcoil (Truth's commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG
The Constitution is now unconstitutional.
13 posted on 08/05/2010 11:40:06 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Will must be the harder, courage the bolder, spirit must be the more, as our might lessens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Must have just started 12-88

I was in the middle of posting a poll about denying citizenship to anchor babies when they pulled that one and put this one up.

14 posted on 08/05/2010 11:41:00 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California’s gay marriage ban?

Here are the results so far:

Yes 6%
No 92%
Undecided 2%


15 posted on 08/05/2010 11:42:24 AM PDT by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Think about this.

The Judge’s decision came from his own homosexual proclivities, as the Judge is a known homosexual.

Just think of what happens when we have two Lesbians on the Supreme Court.


16 posted on 08/05/2010 11:42:44 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: miele man

Getting better: Yes 5%, No 94%, Undecided 1%


17 posted on 08/05/2010 11:44:20 AM PDT by ssaftler (Arizonans: Doing the job that Americans won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

NO now at 94%.


18 posted on 08/05/2010 11:44:27 AM PDT by filospinato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; SandRat
One judge trumps seven million adult voters? And someone thinks that’s OK? Stunning.

As SandRat once said: "Tucson is the blue stain on Arizona's red dress."

That cracks me up every time I think about it. Unfortunately I live there.

19 posted on 08/05/2010 11:44:37 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Luckily this idiot ruling is being stayed. A couple of lesbians live down the street from us and were celebrating in front of their house because they have been planning on getting ‘married’. LOL, you should have seen the look on their faces when I told them there is a stay on the ruling and the will of the people still stands.


20 posted on 08/05/2010 11:45:34 AM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
The Judge’s decision came from his own homosexual proclivities, as the Judge is a known homosexual.

At the very least, he should have recused himself.

21 posted on 08/05/2010 11:45:58 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

When Bill Ayers had gay sex with males in the Weather Underground, he says it was an act to “smash monogamy”.


22 posted on 08/05/2010 11:46:04 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

The horse looks dead and flogged now but many of the libtards may still be sleeping off last night’s “fun” or at the doc’s getting their AIDS cocktail.


23 posted on 08/05/2010 11:47:29 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

freeped.


24 posted on 08/05/2010 11:48:35 AM PDT by Keith (We live in an America of National Socialism...sound familiar? It should...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
When Bill Ayers had gay sex with males in the Weather Underground, he says it was an act to “smash monogamy”.

Barack Obama is the Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers.

I saw that on FR a while back but can't remember who posted it.

25 posted on 08/05/2010 11:49:50 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

No is 93%. I’m guessing not a lot of votes have been cast.


26 posted on 08/05/2010 11:54:33 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (If you call a tail a leg, how many legs has a dog?Five?No, calling a tail a leg don't make it a leg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

Why bother with a poll when all those votes didn’t phase anyone either?


27 posted on 08/05/2010 11:55:06 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG
KGUN 9 POLL Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California's gay marriage ban?

Yes No Undecided

Thank you for participating in our poll. Here are the results so far:

Yes 6%

No 93%

Undecided 1%

28 posted on 08/05/2010 11:56:37 AM PDT by BelegStrongbow (St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG; All
No matter how few agree, I have to stick with the libertarian view that if it does not hurt others, then it is nobodies business. Stable gay relations are a lot less costly to the health care system than wild promiscuous unprotected gay sex.
29 posted on 08/05/2010 11:56:55 AM PDT by gleeaikin (question authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

CA needs a sore loser law.

The state has I & R for decades now.

Why bother to spend so much money on a ballot/vote and then go to Court if you lose.

What’s up with that!!!!!!


30 posted on 08/05/2010 11:58:19 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

And the judge is a corrupt, un-American, sorry excuse for a human being.


31 posted on 08/05/2010 11:58:49 AM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

“if it does not hurt others, then it is nobodies business”

Huh? Do you even understand how changing the thousands year old definition of marriage totally changes our society? Do you understand the tremendous cost of AIDS on our health care system and the high level of suicide among those with same-sex attraction disorder? I don’t think the solution is to legitimize perversion and sanction it with state and federal rights. That is pure insanity.


32 posted on 08/05/2010 12:01:25 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
No matter how few agree, I have to stick with the libertarian view that if it does not hurt others, then it is nobodies business. Stable gay relations are a lot less costly to the health care system than wild promiscuous unprotected gay sex.

How does affirming the traditional definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman deprive homosexuals of the ability to have stable relationships?

33 posted on 08/05/2010 12:17:13 PM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

I thought it was kinda queer that he didn’t recuse himself from the case, for having a conflict of interest.


34 posted on 08/05/2010 12:28:31 PM PDT by crosshairs (Celebrate diversity. Own a variety of firearms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

Something squirley going on - voted and results showed:

16 Yes
84 No
0 Undecided

Then it suddenly changed to:

11 Yes
89 No
0 Undecided

Wonder where all the undecided went? Must be another one of those unscientific polls.


35 posted on 08/05/2010 12:37:12 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

Doesn’t matter what we think. We are no longer in a representative democracy.


36 posted on 08/05/2010 12:42:23 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (I will not be silenced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

“No matter how few agree, I have to stick with the libertarian view that if it does not hurt others, then it is nobodies business.”

A lot of people will agree with that, even a lot of conservatives. The biggest problem I have with the Vaughn Walker ruling is that it is based on such distorted constitutional reasoning. If the 14th Amendment can be used to justify the nullification of the Defense of Marriage Act, then it’s hard for me to see how it can’t be twisted to justify the nullification of almost any law. If you don’t get your way, you just change the rules, that’s the liberal way of doing things.


37 posted on 08/05/2010 12:47:55 PM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Yeah, because now that they can get “married”, all of a sudden they’re going to stop having that wild promiscuous, unprotected sex. Please.


38 posted on 08/05/2010 12:53:44 PM PDT by beandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

And that is why I could never support libertarians anymore than I do liberals. They are of the same stripe in most cases except when it comes to guns. Then I agree with them. But they are also for abortion on demand, same sex marrage, open borders, legalization of all drugs and many other things that are harmful to America.

I used to consider myself a libertarian until I went to their site and saw what they really were for. I could never call myself a libertarian again.


39 posted on 08/05/2010 12:54:57 PM PDT by RickB444 (Beat your sword into plowshares, but wined up plowing the fields of someone who kept their sword.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: filospinato
NO now at 94%.

That's a SUPER majority.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

40 posted on 08/05/2010 1:07:48 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG
As SandRat once said: "Tucson is the blue stain on Arizona's red dress."

That cracks me up every time I think about it. Unfortunately I live there.

LOL - you've got a great sense of humor or you're a total realist... either way - it's funny.

41 posted on 08/05/2010 1:15:57 PM PDT by GOPJ (Asked for ZIP? Give 82224 - Lost Springs,Wy - most sparsely populated in country. Freeper:SamAdams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Texan Tory

“If you don’t get your way, you just change the rules, that’s the liberal way of doing things.”

And if you find that your new rules suddenly work against you, you change them back again (like when the Democrats in Massachussetts in 2009 voted to reverse their own 2004 law on keeping vacant Senate seats empty until a special election).


42 posted on 08/05/2010 1:15:59 PM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG; dynachrome

Yes
23%

No
77%

Undecided
0%

No total number of votes given


43 posted on 08/05/2010 1:30:04 PM PDT by TheOldLady (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

*snort*


44 posted on 08/05/2010 1:32:38 PM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

The libtards are finally sobering up.

The NOs were at 94% up upthread.


45 posted on 08/05/2010 1:36:17 PM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

Oh, thtop it you thilly!


46 posted on 08/05/2010 1:37:54 PM PDT by AZ .44 MAG (Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG; The Comedian

Yes, I saw The Comedian’s post and thought I’d be piling on, but I guess the lib votebots have arrived.


47 posted on 08/05/2010 1:39:28 PM PDT by TheOldLady (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Bump to what you said.


48 posted on 08/05/2010 1:41:54 PM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG

Does any know if Rush or Hannity mentioned this, and if they did, was it more than a passing thought?


49 posted on 08/05/2010 1:43:35 PM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ .44 MAG; 2ndDivisionVet; A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; all the best; AmericaUnite; ...
Thanks to AZ.44mag and TheOldlady for da pings!

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

50 posted on 08/05/2010 2:02:33 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson