Skip to comments.
The Death of the Dollar
THE AMERICAN THINKER ^
| August 06, 2010
| Vasko Kohlmayer
Posted on 08/05/2010 11:35:11 PM PDT by onyx
Nothing can save our financial system in the long run. It is doomed to collapse. This is inevitable, because our government controls and manages its very foundation -- the dollar.
The federal government began its takeover of the dollar in 1913 when it established the Federal Reserve Banking System. Prior to that the dollar was a real store of value. In the period from 1783 to 1913 there was a long period of currency stability with virtually no inflation. If you saved one dollar in 1800, your great grandchild could buy roughly the same amount of goods with the same dollar one century later.
In 1913 five dollars could get you the following
15 pounds of potatoes, 10 pounds of flour, 5 pounds of sugar, 5 pounds of chuck roast, 3 pounds of round steak, 3 pounds of rice, 2 pounds each of cheese and bacon, and a pound each of butter and coffee... two loaves of bread, 4 quarts of milk and a dozen eggs.
In 2010 five dollars barely gets
you two pounds of cut chicken meat.
Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 the dollar has shed more than 90 percent of its value. The loss of value has been especially pronounced since 1971 when Richard Nixon took the dollar off the last vestiges of the gold standard. On that date the dollar became a pure fiat currency grounded in nothing but the whims of politicians and technocrats. The consequences have been disastrous. One thousand of 1971 dollars would only buy
$185 worth of goods today. This represents a loss of some 80 percent in purchasing power.
The dollar has already entered its terminal phase. The word "doom" is written across it for anyone with the eyes to see. Sad to say, there is no way to reverse its downward slide. With more than $13 trillion in public debt and some $100 trillion in unfunded mandates our federal government has assumed
far more obligations that it can ever make good on. Worse still, these figures are growing larger every year.
To put it bluntly, our federal government is flat-out bankrupt. Currency disintegration is always the unavoidable result of government bankruptcy. The dollar -- which has been weakening for many decades -- will at some point go into a sudden death spin.
The only question is when. It may happen six months from now or six years from now. The timeframe is impossible to predict, but we can now for certain that happen it will. No one -- not even the federal government -- can escape the numbers. And the numbers are hideous. One hundred trillion plus is a killer.
Under normal circumstances the dollar would have collapsed already given how impossibly indebted our government is. Some people are puzzled by its continued survival. They say this is just another sign that we live in a crazy world. But there is nothing crazy about it. The dollar is still alive, because there is no ready alternative.
Doomed though it may be in the long term, big time holders of US dollars keep desperately hanging on, because they have nowhere else to go. Where else could China invest its nearly one trillion dollar reserves? There is no easy option. So China keeps propping America's federal debt by purchasing Treasury notes and thus keeping the dollar afloat. It is a bad deal for China and a fortuitous one for the US, at least for the time being. But things cannot go on like this forever. Eventually something will give in and the whole gargantuan house of debt will come crashing down. When that happens things will get ugly.
Some people may say this situation has been brought about by reckless fiscal and budgetary policies rather than by the government's management of the currency. But the ability of government to run deficits is directly tied to its power to manage money.
It is very difficult for politicians to run large deficits if the currency is anchored in something intrinsically real and valuable, let's say gold. This is because when they post large budget shortfalls under a gold standard, people naturally ask them: "Where in the world are you going to get all the gold to pay for all this spending." And since politicians do not know how to make gold, they are forced to admit: "We are going to get it from you, the people, of course. Where else could it come from?"
As you can imagine, such answers do not usually go well with the voting public. The restrictive quality that real money exerts on the profligacy of politicians is often referred as "the golden handcuffs."
As it is now, most people do not think that they will have to pay for the spending incurred by their representatives in Congress. They think that deficits are something that does not concern them directly. They somehow assume the if the government needs more money it can simply issue more bonds. But this way of living is unsustainable and sooner or later the inflow from abroad will stop. Then we will all pay for our government's extravagance by the disintegration of the currency.
Traumatic as it may be, we should not be surprised by this. It has to end this way. This result became ineluctable the moment the American people gave government control over their money. Let's hope that we will learn from our mistakes. Let's hope that when the present monetary regime finally unwinds, we will have the wisdom to lay a more solid foundation for our money than the whims of politicians.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dollar; gold; government; obama; palin; silver
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Oh, and some investment firms made out quite respectably, apparently without much gummit help, through the Bush dive and beyond. Pershing is one of them. How do I know? That’s where I put my IRA. Yes, I lucked out; I don’t consider myself a genius in picking investment firms.
posted on 08/06/2010 12:43:38 AM PDT
by HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
I do think, as does the author, that the current cycle of issuing ever-more vast amounts of debt is not sustainable.
My own guess is that when it comes time to grasp the nettle, the politicians will issue U.S. Notes again --- we only stopped doing so 40 years or so ago --- and probably in vast quantities. (There's a current statutory limit of $300 million in issuance of such notes, but I am sure that it would take Speaker Pelosi's Congress less than a day to deem that fixed.)
posted on 08/06/2010 1:02:04 AM PDT
(In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
From that Sun-Times article, I am kind of curious how many of those Chicago apartments are rent-controlled apartments. The writer of the article failed to mention that, but it was one of the first things that popped into my head as I read that.
posted on 08/06/2010 1:18:32 AM PDT
(A conservative in the television industry--yes, we do exist)
In 1913 five dollars could get you the following:
It's worth reminding the thread that it takes ~ 10 minutes to earn that 5 dollars today, as opposed to ~ 10 working days in 1913.
posted on 08/06/2010 2:04:40 AM PDT
(...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
I honestly dont understand what to do or think.
Then don't! The politicians are depending on that!
In a more serious vein, I don't know what this author is thinking with the pollyanna ending. If the world monetary system collapses how does he expect to build a new one? We have heard the myth of the Phoenix rising from the ashes, we saw Europe rebuilt after WWII, the world survived the Great Depression but in those cases there was always a winner still standing. If the dollar collapses so does everything else, as the author points out.
How do you reflate the balloon after all the air is gone? Oil, gold, land, etc. all will still have value but with no accepted money how will transactions take place? No one can carry barrels of oil around with them, or the deeds to their property, or pounds of gold to exchange, in a world of varying values.
Without an accepted medium of exchange nothing moves.
posted on 08/06/2010 3:06:01 AM PDT
by Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
If the world monetary system collapses how does he expect to build a new one?
The aristocrats will hole up in their mansions and ride it out.
posted on 08/06/2010 3:17:05 AM PDT
All fiat currencies start out as a way to get things.
A bushel of wheat, a pound of sugar, an acre of land.
But now fiat currencies have a different meaning. They are a way to get more fiat currencies. More and more.
Anybody remember derivatives? Hedge funds?
When currencies (MONEY!!!!!) loses it’s relation to “things”, then it becomes something mythical. Something that isn’t part of reality. An end of itself, not representing anything real.
Not sure if we are there yet. But we are dam close.
posted on 08/06/2010 3:17:18 AM PDT
(They ain't "immigrants". They're "CRIMMIGRANTS"!!!!)
Debt default is deflationary. Debt itself is neutral to inflationary. We’ve had this discussion before.
There has been a truly epic and historic effort to ward off the deflationary effects of the financial crisis over the past several years. Much to the chagrin of many, it’s been somewhat successful, for now at least.
What we’re seeing is distorted as a result. For those closer to the subsistence level, who are not in any way living off government subsidy, an increasing amount of increasingly dear income is required.
For instance, your typical box of snack foods. Yes, it’s not the wisest choice and not the healthiest choice, but it’s gone from 99 cents to $2.50 on sale in the past three years. Watched it happen. Breakfast foods in particular have skyrocketed.
Lower and middle class wage earners are being squeezed from both sides, and are not experiencing deflation in any meaningful sense, as far as day-to-day expenses, while what investments they’ve managed to accumulate and hang onto are collapsing.
What to call this is a puzzle, but it’s pernicious. Another severe round of financial crisis is really going to hurt such people. I’m unfortunately slipping into that category, myself.
Who will retain the cash to capitalize after the second leg down that we all sense is coming? We know who is being funded to the tune of trillions. Government special interests and financial institutions, an unholy alliance of sorts. Sounds more than just sort of fascist to me.
There’s an answer. Call it “squeezeflation.” Take more money. Higher cost for necessities, decimate investments available to the lower and middle classes.
Corporate health benefit packages are being squeezed, raising costs to seniors. Electric bills are skyrocketing. Local taxes are rising.
These may or may not be the unintended consequences of Obacare, environmentalism, and wasteful/corrupt bureaucracies.
posted on 08/06/2010 3:49:48 AM PDT
I took a job with a former customer after my business went down, grateful to have it, and they’re quite busy unlike many companies. But, pay increases are nonexistent and the very modest health insurance package with a high deductable is going up relentlessly.
I haven’t noticed a big increase in electric, because Duke Energy was denied their 10% increase due to falling demand (!!!??? the joys of being a monopoly) and efforts to minimize power usage.
My personal overhead is as low as it’s going to get, shy of paying off the mortgage in full. I’ll survive. I have to wonder about those not as well set, even though I’ve had quite the decline myself.
Best of luck to you.
I’ve cut out my land line, installed power strips to my various TV setups, and will probably cut my cable package when the promo period is up (don’t watch it much, anyway).
No big vacation this year, eating at home more, and am using rain barrels. This fall, I’m putting up a clothesline and expanding the garden area.
I’m skinning along, but, as you say, one wonders about those not quite as set.
I see a lot more people on food stamps (there are a bunch of rental units a few blocks from here). The local food bank gets quite a crowd.
Granted, this is all anecdotal, but sometimes looking at the “big picture” masks a lot of offsetting trends that effect people differently.
posted on 08/06/2010 4:12:44 AM PDT
For me things become more clear if I start considering the price of things in terms of some commodity (e.g. ounces of gold), rather than paper currency. After all, it's not the number of dollars one has that one should be concerned with so much as what those dollars can buy.
Google "Dow in gold dollars".
posted on 08/06/2010 4:14:07 AM PDT
by The Duke
Nope. Not inflation (a devaluation of the Dollar). The opposite: deflation. Falling salaries. Falling employment (fewer jobs). Falling home prices. Deflation.
In that case, it is good to be a federal contractor. Rates don't change. :)
posted on 08/06/2010 4:25:05 AM PDT
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
Boy this is difficult. I have an offer to sell my property and am forced by the feds to buy another or have 2/3 of the value elimated by taxes. What to do?
posted on 08/06/2010 4:32:16 AM PDT
(I am absolutely done. I am a conservative libertarian.)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
:) Pretty good advice. Thanks!
posted on 08/06/2010 5:11:55 AM PDT
Call it squeezeflation. Take more money. Higher cost for necessities, decimate investments available to the lower and middle classes.
That's precisely what's going on. It's hitting the elderly on fixed incomes too, and they VOTE.
posted on 08/06/2010 5:16:45 AM PDT
To: The Duke
Right. That’s what I follow.
posted on 08/06/2010 5:19:03 AM PDT
That’s just flat-out wrong and makes ya want to start thinking ‘around the edges.’
posted on 08/06/2010 5:23:54 AM PDT
"Where does one put their dollars at now, especially the money tied up in a 401k, that is expected to finance you through retirement? "
I vote for guns, ammo, canned tuna (the good kind, Starkist Gormet Choice Solid Light Tuna Filet, $1.12 @ wallyworld for 4.5 oz.) and bars of bath soap. Lots of drinking water. That's all just a start.
posted on 08/06/2010 8:41:44 AM PDT
by matthew fuller
(2012: Bachman, Bolton, Brewer, Liz Cheney, Coburn, DeMint, Inhofe, Jindal, Palin and Pence.)
Your major financial transactions in life are:
Don’t forget medical and education expenses.
posted on 08/06/2010 8:52:22 AM PDT
by Atlas Sneezed
(Anything worth doing, is worth doing badly at first.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson