Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitch Daniels: We need a “truce” on social issues (Daniels: SoCons are a Distraction)
Hot Air ^ | June 10, 2010 | Allahpundit

Posted on 08/10/2010 2:28:39 PM PDT by GOPGuide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-178 next last
To: photoguy

Let us see them win the election without social conservatives.


61 posted on 08/10/2010 3:24:07 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

But this was a stupid remark. There is no possibility of a truce, and right now the Democratic party is unapologetically pro-choice about pro-gay. Obama’s views are precisely those of Sarah Weddington: The woman’s right to kill her child is
absolute, in the womb or out.


62 posted on 08/10/2010 3:24:32 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: photoguy
Social conservatives will not be who elects the next president. It will be the middle of the roaders....

and we all know that "middle of the roaders" want sex in kindergarten and free abortions to middle schoolers

63 posted on 08/10/2010 3:27:10 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide; indylindy

Daniels has just lost credibility. While the debt and spending are the most important issues, social issues cannot be dismissed.


64 posted on 08/10/2010 3:27:18 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Thank you, Abather, for replying to me. My first impression watching him this past Sunday was that his rather sweet face reminded me of Ike! :)

He's very knowledgeable, no doubt about that and I thought he came across honest and sincere. He was quick with his answers and I loved his comment (paraphrasing) “you'd be surprised at how much government, you never miss.”

It's nice to know that he likes Sarah. I'll wager she admires him. I guess they know one another as governors.

65 posted on 08/10/2010 3:27:54 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
One can not judge Daniels by those few words uttered many weeks ago.

What was the context? Is he anti-life, pro-gay?

The answer is NO. Daniels is a very good man who has very traditional values.

Maybe he was making a larger point which is being twisted out of all recognition?

One very fat point IN FAVOR of Daniels is that he is a huge BUDGET HAWK. Not saying he should be President yet, necessarily, but his skills are very badly needed in DC.

66 posted on 08/10/2010 3:32:18 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
would have to call a truce on the so-called social issues.

Really? That's a damn joke. The GOP has been doing that for over 40 years. How's that working out? Graham, McCain, Daniels and all the other namby pamby golden calf worshipers are part and parcel of why we are where we are today. These go along to get along types are the main reason we are staring into the abyss. If these guys are conservatives I hate to think what liberal means.

The GOP compromises and or backs away completely on social issues and the Left crams it down our throats. Not to mention much of the financial debacle is directly related to social issues and the associated sending and/or programs which the right caves on all the time.

If they have no stomach or backbone for the fight to preserve both our nation and culture they need to move the hell out of the way.

67 posted on 08/10/2010 3:32:29 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I agree with you. He is top notch in a fiscal sense, but he messes up here.


68 posted on 08/10/2010 3:36:51 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: photoguy

so killing a third of my generation has absolutely zero fiscal consequences? Think again. Fix the social issues and the fiscal issues will sort themselves out.

There are long-term structural problems with the economy that tax cutting alone are not going to fix.


69 posted on 08/10/2010 3:38:36 PM PDT by BenKenobi (We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: photoguy
If you are a “social issues” voter, you better learn what really matters for the here and now.

Hint:

It's not abortion or same sex marriage.

Wrong answer. Social issues are important, and most of us are intelligent enough to understand that we can deal with both at the same time.

People who are untrustworthy on social issues also tend to be untrustworthy on fiscal issues, as well. This nonsense that we "have to focus on fiscal issues" and ignore social issues is just cover fire for RINOs. No thanks. Anyone not smart enough to realise that abortion and gay marriage are just as important to the future of this country as debts and deficit are is someone who is obviously too stupid to have anything good to contribute to the political process.

70 posted on 08/10/2010 3:38:57 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (The success of Darwinism was accompanied by a decline in scientific integrity. - Dr. Wm R. Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Lets see them win without the middle...never gonna happen.


71 posted on 08/10/2010 3:41:08 PM PDT by photoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: photoguy
"What good is character if you have no country left?"

What good is a country without character?

72 posted on 08/10/2010 3:42:24 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Abortion isn’t the issue, character is. I want to know what makes up a candidate inside them. If they haven’t a problem with killing an unborn baby, that is a character flaw I am unwilling to look past.

Daniels can focus on economic issues and that would be great. If he is afraid to take a stand on moral issues, he has a problem because the Democrats and the media aren’t going to let him off the hook. When they badger him on abortion as they do all Republican candidates, what is he going to say? Daniels had better be prepared and his answers better be heartfelt because I and others will be watching.

BTW, social conservatives are economic conservatives. It is the economy only conservatives who are the problem. They are the ones willing to sell their soul for a buck.


73 posted on 08/10/2010 3:42:25 PM PDT by upsdriver (ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

No they won’t.

As long as you make the social issues your voting plank, you will continue to lose.


74 posted on 08/10/2010 3:44:00 PM PDT by photoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: photoguy

The middle are mindless dolts. Flashy commercials and a good ten second soundbite is all that’s needed to land them.


75 posted on 08/10/2010 3:44:41 PM PDT by upsdriver (ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

“What good is a country without character?”

So I guess we wait and see. Clearly we don’t agree.

I’ll take the COUNTRY first.


76 posted on 08/10/2010 3:46:09 PM PDT by photoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Well said!


77 posted on 08/10/2010 3:47:05 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: photoguy

They aren’t two issues.

Abortion has severe fiscal long term consequences. Abortion has been legal since 1973, which means that the generation that is now 37 or younger will be smaller than the preceding generations.

This has severe consequences for the tax base in the next 15 years, and beyond, which will persist so long as abortion is legal.

Don’t get me wrong, many of the fiscal problems can be solved by cutting spending, but unless abortion is banned, you won’t get rid of the overall structural problems.


78 posted on 08/10/2010 3:49:17 PM PDT by BenKenobi (We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

The middle choses, thats the fact. If you are correct (and I don’t think you are)you had better hope its your soundbites that sway them because if they don’t you go down in flames. Can you say Obama for 8?

Reality sucks but that’s reality.


79 posted on 08/10/2010 3:49:41 PM PDT by photoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

No, fiscal conservatives have a moral compass too. They just understand the battle and what must be won FIRST.


80 posted on 08/10/2010 3:52:00 PM PDT by photoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson