Skip to comments.Reporter Quits Yahoo (says Free Republic hosts child porn)
Posted on 09/22/2010 6:59:33 PM PDT by remaxagnt
Yahoo News editor Andrew Golis says star reporter John Cook is quitting to re-join Gawker because "he prefers the license Gawker gave him to add his opinions into his reporting to the scale and credibility Yahoo! News could offer."
John tells AOL's Jeff Bercovici that's hogwash.
He says he quit Yahoo because they censored him like crazy.
In one instance, Cook was forced to bowdlerize a quotation from New York Times reporter James Risen; he was told that referring to masturbation, even euphemistically, was unacceptable. On similar grounds, he was prohibited from writing about the conservative website Free Republic hosting child pornography. Most glaringly, he was told that a proposed story on the Obama Administration raising the salary of White House staffers by 9% lacked the necessary balance; it was killed
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/john-cook-left-yahoo-because-they-wouldnt-let-him-write-about-masturbation-big-white-house-salaries-and-the-free-republics-child-porn-problem-2010-9#ixzz10JTtgHyk
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
I dunno...I am sure that google tries their best to help child pornographers peddle their wares in every way they can. After all..Google is a big supporter of democrats.
Wasn’t that at the same time some troll kept posting pics of that very naked old homosexual holding his nether cheeks open? That pic was posted as a thread repeatedly. I think the IP addy was finally banned.
I you are anything like me a lot of those hits were your own :)
good point two of the most depressed, angry and 'misunderstood' people on that planet.
How damned low can they go?
That is a common internet prank using a image swap script. For example, someone looks for an image of a bunny on Google and posts it. They don’t know that the site they posted it from uses that script and replaces the “Goatse” (don’t Google that) image with the bunny.
Naah. Heesh not on drugsh. He is just a lil...(Bents forward in intense concentration) druhnk...But...No drugsh.
Wow, Bernie Ward, the "lyin' of the left" out here in Pelousy-ville is a guest of the state department of corrections for doing less than this POS. If I were Bernie, I'd sit on this guy when he gets out.
Actually this was a troll that posted it. Usually early in the morning. Seems to me that I remember some changes in software and for awhile newbies couldn’t post threads.
hmmmm...well he apparently is still defending FR (at least on this smear) because I copied his comment from the link in the thread.
There are many pictures from tinypic links floating around in archives that have been changed from the originals..mostly harmless..but I have a framed flower picture (tinypic link)in my files I went to use a few months ago that was changed to adult porn..really porn.
I haven’t used tinypic at all lately..fearing some hacker might change my picture!
I have never seen one child porn picture posted here...and I have lurked since 2000.
i am not a troll! 100 conservative and running for township board in nw indiana.
I wasn't talking about you. I never even noticed you nor mentioned your name. Why would you even think that?
Screw libel claims; what he did was distribution of child pornography and is a crime.
Agree 100%. I was just trying to give some history to the story. Not sure when any of this happened, but got the impression that it happened a while back.
Report the sob to the fbi.
I have no personal knowledge of the incident, so am not the best person to report the guy. Just found the info in the comment section at the link yesterday. I am sure Jim is exploring all of his options. He should also sue the hell out of AOL and the Washington Post. It looks like they have repeated the libel.
I believe that what the reporter if referring to is the picture of the girl from FLDS that was forced into marriage at an early age.
IIRC, there were comments that because the girl was underage at the time of the photo, (even though she was completely dressed), it ‘could’ be considered child porn (which was completely laughable).
I don't see a problem here. It's not like reporters even have a passing knowledge of truth or the slightest shred of decency.
Since I've never seen child porn sites advertised or 'run into' them while surfing the web, this 'reporter' must have spent a lot of time finding them.
Maybe it's his hobby.
I can see from the majority of comments on here, that I am wrong about the original incident.
OH well, next time I’ll read the whole thread before I post.
(well.... I’ll try)
Yahoo didn't want him posting child porn either?
LOL..I hope the dude is ruined by this whole thing. He deserves nothing less.
They obviously don't get out much.
anyone who would have a “DailyKOS journal” is incompetent to pose as any objective honest journalist
Are you sure his name isn’t John Kook?