Those are only Photoshopped, but I do "engage" one of THESE in the real world two or three times per day. :)
Posted on 09/24/2010 2:38:09 PM PDT by NYer
I work towards educating people and pushing to stop it.
My point was that I do not fear it. I do not have a phobia. Nothing about my opposition constitutes an “irrational fear.”
I am not Islamophobic. I just fight against those who are Islamophilic.
Huh? It's clear that you don't understand the threat.
Islam is guided by the Koran to convert you or eradicate you.
When they speak of tolerance it's only one sided. They have no tolerance for anything that is not Islamic.
If I were a man I’d love to use one of those urinals.
Please enlighten me as to how you came to the conclusion that I do not understand the threat.
Because I played off the them of the ridiculous term “Islamophobia?” That means I don’t understand the threat?
Please, share with me how you concluded that I don’t understand, since you “clearly” know me so well.
Those are only Photoshopped, but I do "engage" one of THESE in the real world two or three times per day. :)
These are you words: “I just fight against those who are Islamophilic.”
I still fail to see what your objection is, or how you interpret that to mean I do not understand the threat.
I am inclined to think perhaps you do not understand the meaning of my statement.
If something is hydrophobic, it avoids and retracts from water.
If something is hydrophilic, it is attracted to and draws in water.
Given the ridiculous term “Islamophobia,” I made a quip here about fighting those who are “Ismalophilic.” In other words, I was using the same silly method of terminology to identify those who are inviting Islam into our country and working to spread it through the United States.
How is that demonstrative of someone who does not understand the threat?
But that’s my point...the threat does not come from those who are attracted to Islam, especially given the false and misleading representations that Islam is allowed to perpetrate on the American public with impunity.
The threat lies in the fact that the very premise of Islam as a religion of peace and tolerance is a lie.
The threat comes from its leaders (and not its followers) who push the envelop at every opportunity and who take advantage of our open society so they can eventually close it.
The threat comes from US leaders (like Zero and Blumenthal) who equate building a mosque with a church or synagogue while refusing to acknowledge that Islam and the Koran and Sharia Law are incompatible with our Constitution.
The threat comes from our media who allow these charlatan imams to get away with making outrageous claims that the US Constitution is compatible with Sharia Law.
Attempts to saturate our culture and country with Islam are not limited to those who buy the lies. The leaders and followers “in the know” are just as culpable in pursuing a Sharia victory here in the United States and the world. Success against Islam requires action against both those who know its teachings and those who accept it due to ignorance.
To say that the threat comes from its leaders seems lacking. The threat comes from the Quran itself, from Muslim leaders, from Muslim followers and from willing allies to Islam. ALL parts must be dealt with in some fashion. If the followers are not dealt with, and only the leaders are attended to, a follower will eventually become a leader.
It’s the whole picture.
In order for the leaders of Islam to be less of a threat, those who enable those leaders must be stopped or educated and brought out of the fold.
I’m not interested in arguing this with you. You have your own idea of what the issue is here, and that’s fine and dandy. Now that I realize you’re reading my point how you wish, I have nothing left to offer this discussion.
I agree.
You should go tilt at your Ismalophilic windmills.
Thanks for the support.
Let me know when you formulate a plan to directly assault the scourge of Islamic leadership. I imagine you’re building a launching pad for a nuke or something. Sadly, I don’t have those kind of resources, so I will have to limit myself to windmills.
I knew those Muhammed images were Photoshopped,but if they were real and I had the “equipment” I’d love to use them! As far as Jane Fonda goes,I liked her in 9 to 5 but I don’t have any admiration for her. The urinal sticker thing is funny.Where on earth do you guys get them?
>>The urinal sticker thing is funny.Where on earth do you guys get them?
I got them from http://www.lznam.com
I highly recommend the site if you’re looking for anything military.
They’re $7 for a 5 pack. I recall first seeing one when I was just a kid. I think I was in a VFW hall with my Dad for some reason, and they were on the urinals. This would have been 40-ish years ago.
I saw the Jane Fonda toilet paper! She deserves it! I was born a year after the Vietnam War ended but I know how you guys were treated. It makes me angry. G-d bless the Vietman Vets.
I’m not a veteran myself. Only a vet’s brat. I was just a couple of years too young to be involved with the draft, though I knew many friends of my older siblings who went, along with my father, who was in the Pacific during WWII, as well as Korea and Vietnam. Those guys hated Fonda so much that it left a lasting impression on me, though my dad never really mentioned her. Being from the WWII generation he never brought any of that home to us kids, while it seemed that the Nam vets were more open to discussing those things.
One friend told me that when he returned from Nam he arrived at the San Francisco airport only to be confronted by and spat in the face by a hippie. You’d have to know this guy to get the whole gist of this, but I can assure you the ramifications of that spit were swift and dramatic.
These hippies would not have the guts to defend this country. I hope your friend clobbered that hippie!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.