Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boxer wins and so does Brown
Fox News ^ | 2 Nov 2010 | Fox news

Posted on 11/02/2010 8:12:53 PM PDT by for-q-clinton

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last
To: presently no screen name

Don’t know. But with 12% of precints reporting, Boxer and Brown still leading.

http://www.sfgate.com/election-results/


201 posted on 11/02/2010 9:05:27 PM PDT by Justaham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: old school
RE: "Where is all of this “alleged” information coming from?"

In the case of the propositions' forecasts those are my opinions based upon huge differences revealed by polling yesterday. That is, the tax proposition was favored by 60+ percent and the proposition to suspend the new emissions standards for industry was opposed by 60+.

Polls rejected the pot law.

Local radio commentators are also questioning the Brown, Boxer wins based upon virtually zero returns -- and news reports here did say that half the ballots are mail-ins. The reports also said that millions of those had yet to be turned in and were due today.

202 posted on 11/02/2010 9:07:29 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48

I won’t ask, but many in California will just have to take the coming trial like the pussies they are.


203 posted on 11/02/2010 9:08:21 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: p. henry
Wouldn't put Brown and Boxer in the same category. Brown is an old hack and I damn sure did not vote from him, but there it is remotely understandable how he can attract some voters.

Boxer on the other hand is an arrogant idiotic, inarticulate, unlikeable and a case in point on the deeply disturbing average California voter. Look as hard as you like objectively — Boxer simply has no discernable merits.

204 posted on 11/02/2010 9:09:30 PM PDT by R W Reactionairy ("Everyone is entitled to their own opinion ... but not to their own facts" Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Thought Halloween was over!!!


205 posted on 11/02/2010 9:10:08 PM PDT by Lakeside Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R W Reactionairy

“Boxer on the other hand is an arrogant idiotic, inarticulate, unlikeable and a case in point on the deeply disturbing average California voter. Look as hard as you like objectively — Boxer simply has no discernable merits.”

Very, well-said!


206 posted on 11/02/2010 9:12:44 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: rurgan

The numbers don;t like - 7.6 million democrats to 5.2 million Republicans, with 3.4 million Independents thrown in, and lean left on social issues.


207 posted on 11/02/2010 9:13:24 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Now, the lunatics have been handed the keys to the asylum. As America moves back from the abyss. California just sped up, and is now driving into it. This will be at very least. Spectacular. Like watching a crash, at Indianapolis.

You are exactly right.

I'll be reporting from Ground Zero.

208 posted on 11/02/2010 9:16:16 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

The left coasters are nuts.


209 posted on 11/02/2010 9:18:05 PM PDT by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
C-span has it at 15% of precincts, Boxer-47.9% to Fiorina-46.3%, and despite that closeness, they've still got it called for Boxer already. Smells like BS to me.

http://hosted.ap.org/
210 posted on 11/02/2010 9:18:06 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Boxer is only ahead of Fiorina by 3,800 votes at the moment. That one is prematurely called. They no doubt have their algorithms and historical precinct statistics etc but this is closer than the PA Senate race which swung from 2% behind to a slight win by Toomey.


211 posted on 11/02/2010 9:47:55 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Boxer is only ahead of Fiorina by 3,800 votes at the moment. That one is prematurely called. They no doubt have their algorithms and historical precinct statistics etc but this is closer than the PA Senate race which swung from 2% behind to a slight win by Toomey.


212 posted on 11/02/2010 9:52:05 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

That’s what some of us have been saying on this thread since 8pm.


213 posted on 11/02/2010 9:53:38 PM PDT by Cinnamon Girl (G-d Bless President Bush. He kept us safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl

Sorry, FR is soooo slooooow I was lucky to just post it after 10 tries. I hope we pull this one out!


214 posted on 11/02/2010 10:08:54 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl

Sorry, FR is soooo slooooow I was lucky to just post it after 10 tries. I hope we pull this one out!


215 posted on 11/02/2010 10:09:07 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl

I just saw Fiorina ahead by a bigger margin than she was just reported being behind. I hope she pulls it out!


216 posted on 11/02/2010 10:12:06 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

At 19% counted, SFGate reports Fiorina on TOP!

They called it too soon.

Whitman only a couple points behind!


217 posted on 11/02/2010 10:26:19 PM PDT by harmonium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

I can see calling Brown, but with millions of absentees, one would have to know what percentage of the absentee voters;

a) turned in valid ballots and
b) who they actually voted for.

So, yes, as a statistician, I’d say a call based on exit polling alone, is premature in a close race like Fiorina-Boxer. And I said the same when Toomey was behind. Still waiting on Brady-Quinn in Illinois, Buck-Bennet in Colorado, Rossi-Murray in Washington, and Miller-McAdams-Lisa M Likely in Alaska.


218 posted on 11/02/2010 11:17:58 PM PDT by bIlluminati (Don't just hope for change, work for change in 2011-2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Brown was just on Fox. He doesn’t sound or look good. Wonder why????? /sarc


219 posted on 11/02/2010 11:23:35 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
The man stumbled around and didn't really say anything. CA made a huge mistake voting for this reprocessed ham. Meg might have turned the state around.

vaudine

220 posted on 11/02/2010 11:28:23 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson