Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flowerplough

You spend too much time listening to the radio. I work here twelve months a year, and interact with hundreds of teachers every week from all over the country. You live in a fantasy land where we’re all commies, instead of people doing their jobs.

Oh, since it’s the appropriate date, my father—a 35-year veteran in the Marine Corps (Force Recon, by the way)—tells all who’ll listen how HOMOS are accepted in the Corps, as long as they do their jobs. Does that mean Marines are queer? My daddy is extremely manly. Shriek away, flower.


14 posted on 11/10/2010 9:03:32 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: warchild9
Anecdotal evidence (ie your experience) is not particularly useful (like the example of your father).

Polls and studies as well as contributions to political parties all shown overwhelming liberal faculties. This is particularly true of “elite” campuses.

While I am personally encouraged by your anecdotal evidence, I am largely unpersuaded.

16 posted on 11/10/2010 9:08:30 AM PST by NeilGus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: warchild9

Too much time listening to the radio? Maybe too much time arguing with other idiots on the interweb?

“Conservative Professors Hard To Find”

...By coincidence, this leftward surge is the topic of a just-published investigation, “Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty.” Ponderous title aside, this rigorous and important study contains much of interest.

Using such methodologies as cross-tabulating political self-descriptions and multiple regression analysis, the co-authors - an emeritus professor of government at Smith College, Stanley Rothman; a professor of communication at George Mason University, S. Robert Lichter, and a professor of political science at the University of Toronto, Neil Nevitte - answer two questions:

•How do American faculty see politics?
When professors are asked about their political outlook, they call themselves liberal about four times more often than the general public. In some departments (English literature most of all, followed by philosophy, political science, and religious studies), more than 80% of the faculty calls itself liberal and less than 5% calls itself conservative. This disparity has prompted “a substantial shift to the left” since the mid-1980s, and is still increasing.

•Why are faculties so liberal?
Conservatives complain of endemic political bias. Liberals retort that conservatives are dumb. In the words of Robert Brandon, chairman of Duke University’s philosophy department, “We try to hire the best, smartest people available. If, as John Stuart Mill said, stupid people are generally conservative, then there are lots of conservatives we will never hire.”

Which side is correct? The conservatives are.

Mr. Rothman, et al., find that, even when professional accomplishments are equal, a more liberal outlook predicts “a significantly higher quality of institutional affiliation.” They even assign a number to this liberal edge: “The ideological orientations of professors are about one-fifth as important as their professional achievements in determining the quality of the school” for which they work. This means, Robert Lichter said, “Republicans get worse jobs than Democrats.”

Conservative complaints about “liberal homogeneity in academia deserve to be taken seriously,” the authors conclude. They also state that their findings “suggest strongly that a leftward shift has occurred on college campuses in recent years, to the extent that political conservatives have become an endangered species in some departments.”

Endangered species? In the more pungent observation by David Horowitz, “Universities are a left wing monolith these days. A conservative professor, or a Republican or evangelical Christian professor, is as rare as a unicorn.” A Harvard Crimson article acknowledges that the Rothman study implies that “Kremlin on the Charles [River]” might in fact be accurate when applied to Harvard.

The Rothman team’s work is not likely to receive much of a hearing on campus. The executive director of the Modern Language Association, Rosemary G. Feal, responded to its findings with predictable outrage: “It boggles my mind the degree to which this is rubbish.”

Assuming that Ms. Feal’s reaction will be the predominant one, the job of creating political balance at Columbia and other universities will require more than nicely asking professors to hire conservatives. It will take a concentrated and protracted effort by stakeholders – alumni, students, parents of students, legislators - to reclaim an institution that has become a fortress for the left.” http://www.meforum.org/pipes/2526/conservative-professors-an-endangered-species

And there’s Mike Adams. His first book, Welcome to the Ivory Tower of Babel, came out in 2004. His second book, Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts “Womyn” On Campus, was published in 2008.


21 posted on 11/10/2010 9:34:30 AM PST by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson