Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TopQuark; fallujah-nuker
And why were they doing (some of) the things you allege? Is it not because the labor you mentioned has failed to stay competitive?

It's because those workers aren't willing to accept the total absence of benefits and Third-World wages just to have a CHANCE at being competitive.

31 posted on 11/11/2010 11:06:34 PM PST by neutronsgalore (ROPERS DELENDA EST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: neutronsgalore
"It's because those workers aren't willing to accept the total absence of benefits and Third-World wages just to have a CHANCE at being competitive. "

Well, that just illustrates my point: how can you be competitive if you don't even know that competitiveness is not the same thing at all as accepting third-world wages?

Suppose you make 10 gadgets per hour and get paid $10. A Chinese worker make 2 gadgets per hour and get paid $1.90 By how much should you salary drop for you to be as desirable as the Chinese worker. The cost of a single gadget you produce is $1 vs. $0.95 when made by the Chinese. You salary should drop only 5% --- from $10 to $9.50 --- for you to be competitive. These $9.50 are far above $1.90 that the Chinese worker makes. You don't have to accept the Chinese wages at all.

Please reflect on this. Perhaps that will make you refrain from repeating the leftist propaganda about "accepting third-world wages" which evil corporations supposedly want you to do.

33 posted on 11/11/2010 11:15:11 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson