Skip to comments.U.S. Supreme Court Will Soon Issue a Landmark Decision on Validity of Constitution (Windsor case)
Posted on 11/15/2010 7:27:33 AM PST by mbarker12474
Anybody know anything about this?
ATLANTA, Nov. 13, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution. The Supreme Court will consider three petitions filed by William M. Windsor, a retired Atlanta, Georgia grandfather. The decision should be rendered by the end of the year. Unless The Supreme Court acts, federal judges will be free to void the Constitution.
The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court by Grandfather Windsor are:
1. Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges? 2. Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants? 3. Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Without The Constitution, the Supreme Court has no authority, so if they rule it void, then their ruling is without force.
OK, now what is this case really about?
Let’s hope Mark Levin covers this on his radio program, today!
Somebody forgot their morning meds?
Based solely on what’s presented here, it sounds like a pro se appeal - the questions themselves are inflammatory. Not saying these aren’t good points, but the SCOTUS prefers questions of law, not drama. Put your flamers away, I’m just saying that as a PROCEDURAL matter, it’s unhelpful to use arguments designed to inflame the passions.
My question exactly!!!
Don’t know anything about but the title alone seems laughable.
If there is no Constitution on what, then, do we base our laws?
It would mean the Courts are now in activist positions and can interpret law on their bias or even base decisions on international law.
This is a press release from the guy involved in the lawsuit. Anything from PRNewswire is a paid promotional release, not a news story.
He sounds like a loony.
Nah, too wacky for satire.
> Without The Constitution, the Supreme Court has no authority, so if they rule it void, then their ruling is without force.
True, but rational thought does not apply to lunacy.
It is quite simple actually.
The court is authorized by the Constitution. If SCOTUS rules the Constitution invalid, it rules that it is not a lawful body and is not authorized to make such a judgment.
Anybody can post anything on PR Newswire. I would want to hear about this from several other sources before believing a word of it. He filed these “petitions” this month and thinks the Supreme Court is going to hear them soon? The Supreme Court, as near as it it possible to tell from this mess of a press release, hasn’t even agreed to hear any of this, let alone issue a decision. This nothing more than a press release from a person who is desperate for personal publicity, and, frankly, a crank. Total waste of time.
Why would he cover this? He doesn’t cover the BC issue in any manner what so ever.
I’ve now looked this up:
“Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Judge Orinda D. Evans”
Friday, 08 October 2010 00:00 William M. Windsor
“Maid of the Mist Accused of Hundreds of Counts of Perjury”
by Niagara Falls Newsline | April 27, 2009
Maid of the Mist Corporation v. Windsor...
Jul 23, 2010 ...
MAID OF THE MIST STEAMBOAT COMPANY, LTD.,. Plaintiffs - Counter-. Defendants - Appellees, versus. ALCATRAZ MEDIA, LLC,. ALCATRAZ MEDIA, INC. ...
Kookiness. Shouldn’t have been on Breitbart. The Supreme Court denied cert., which means that they refused to hear it.
There is no “landmark” decision forthcoming. The article is full of other fearmongering.
There are serious problems with what our courts do in real cases. Worry about them, not this one.
4. Can man-hating, racist hacks be appointed as associate justices of the Supreme Court?
IMHO it’s knowing how to choose your battles. Mark’s a whole lot smarter than this old lady, and being as I can’t go looking for that birth certificate, I will trust his judgement.
Are you not stunned by the depth of corruption on display? It’s way beyond anything we suspected, and grievous. I am not minimizing the BC issue. But, in the beginning, I saw Orly Taites (forgive spelling) interviewed, and she had kook written all over her. That has tainted this whole debate.
Its knowing how to choose your battles.
The truth will come out.