Skip to comments.Assange Calls for Clinton Resignation
Posted on 11/30/2010 2:26:05 PM PST by OldDeckHand
TIME Exclusive: WikiLeaks founder tells Richard Stengel SecState should resign "if it can be shown that she was responsible for ordering U.S. diplomatic figures to engage in espionage in the United Nations, in violation of the international covenants to which the U.S. has signed up."
(Excerpt) Read more at thepage.time.com ...
Maybe she’ll resign over his dead body ... literally.
He’s actually got me sticking up for Hillary. The hell with the UN, I think the only reason we have them in this country is to keep our enemies close.
That's about the best outcome he can hope for, at this point. He's pissed off all the wrong people around the globe. His life isn't worth spit, now.
He may as well spout off in the press, while he's still got breath to do so.
Actually, it was Polonium-210
Do we know whether or old there is an “old” relationship between the precious and Assange? Wonder if “Jody” from Code Pink has been a courier again...
I still remember those FBI files she had when the Clinton regime was in the WH.
What ever happened to those files? Sounds like she is still into the spying business.
Wonder if Cristina ever attracted Bill’s attention?
That said, Assange is talking about the 'international covenants'? Sorry, the US enters into treaties with nations. Any 'agreement' with the UN is tantamount to a treaty with the Elks Club or the Knights of Columbus.
The very fact that this little tid-bit has been leaked to the media, is a sure indicator that the Russians are already under this guy's bed.
I expect him to disappear without a trace in the coming days. The Russians? They won't know a thing about it.
Hey stranger :) Good to see you!
I always assumed there was a lot of back and forth snooping that went on- but it surely seems to have people in an uproar- whether for show or not it’s hard to tell.
Of course Dick Morris ascribes more sinister motives saying he’s sure it’s for blackmail purposes.
Whatever the case- it’s sure an interesting show- though not without consequence.
Hmm....makes sense, in a diabolical sort of way, but I don't know that The Punk is sophisticated enough to pull off something this complex.
He really ain't that smart.
I say they all should resign the entire Obama regime, this is the most incompetent administration in the history of the USA. They have caused severe and irrepairable damage to our standing in the world. This was the Liberals Pandora’s Box.... They were all for leaking any information that they deemed could damage George W. Bush but now it seems Karma has its revenge. Someone needs to stand up and say it....
“Barrack Obama has made America less safe in the world”.
For a couple really, I just don't think so. First, he's not that smart, not by a long-shot. Second, he's black and Hilary isn't. For that reason, and that reason alone he's unstoppable in the Dem primary. He can't be beat and I don't care if Hilary has pictures and videos of him molesting children. Black America is not going to abandon their boy (no pun intended).
Plus, these leaks have really hurt him (Obama). It is going to be very difficult for him to have candid conversation with anyone in a foreign position of power. What little international credibility he had left, is really gone now.
"Any 'agreement' with the UN is tantamount to a treaty with the Elks Club or the Knights of Columbus."
Still here, heehee.
My favorite quote from Hadley was, “When given the choice between [it’s a] conspiracy or incompetence, I choose incompetence. And I’m right 90% of the time.”
How about the lame ducks trying to squeeze through unpopular legislation like the dream act?
And get rid of Hildabeast now before she has a chance to challenge Obambi in the Democrat primary?
So, she asked someone if the Brazilian president was a druggie. So, she's got spies in the UN?
Isn't that what the UN is all about all the countries spying on each other?
And who the hell is aSSange to call for Hildabeast's resignation?
I know the maggot is tied to Soros... and that Obambi is another one of Soros' puppets.
The press talked about 900 FBI files that Hillary got her hands on, but in fact I’m sure it was a lot more than that.
The clintons left the White House with a bunch of computers and computerized FBI files on EVERYONE of importance around the world who has an FBI file, as well as truckloads of White House furniture and china.
Not only that, but they had installed their own guys in the top levels of the FBI during the clinton years, and Sessions did nothing to remove them. So it can be presumed that they were fed more FBI files, even after leaving office.
That only stopped, I’m fairly sure, when hillary lost the White House to Obama. Everyone feared and obeyed her up to that point, because they figured she would be back in the WH for another 8 years, and she would get even with anyone who crossed her.
And I’m not sure if it stopped entirely, because Hillary is still a threat to be President at some point. The Obama administration was filled with former clintonoids, and who knows who they are really loyal to?
How exactly is it binding under US law, which is the law to which our government is responsible.
However, if our nation has made such agreements binding under our law, then I think we should do the honorable thing and withdraw from the UN.
I think Clinton should resign and we should withdraw from the UN regardless of if we broke any of their covenants, but I see no reason why anyone should care what Assange says.
Julian Assange, Oprah, various rock stars and Hollyweird types: Just why should I, or anyone else, give a rat’s derriere what they think about anything? So he posts a bunch of stuff on the internet. Why should I care what he thinks? I am no fan of Hillary’s, but it is not all bad having her there stirring the pot against the Bamster.
There are a lot of people out there that are foolish enough to believe that our government could and should operate in complete and total transparency. However, a lot of them also tend to be pretty close to being anarchists and believe they have a right to know everything about everyone else, but no one has a right to know anything about them.
Now we know why Obama has not acted swiftly to pe-empt Wikileaks on its past transgressions and on their latest espionage.
Assange is in the bag for Obama, and this proves Assange is in the Alinski network, and that he and Obama are hooked up.Obamas light talk of getting to Wikileaks is mere lip service.He has no intention of taking care of Assange to protect America's diplomacy, or our warriors in Afghanistan.
Why didn't Assange ask Obama to resign? Hillery Clinton is Obama's biggest threat for his 2012 second term run. And Obama thinks he has just taken Clinton down.As Rush says, its time for more Operation Chaos.
I’m no supporter of Hitlery, but there, but the grace of God.....
You’re backing up multiple gigs of data to cave paintings? Dang, I’m impressed.
I wouldn't be so sure. I expect that he has saved out some particularly embarrassing memos to be dribbled out if he was to "disappear" suddenly, without explanation. A poison pill life insurance policy as it were.
You, sir, are extremely perceptive.
I never thought I would ever be on Hillary’s side but it’s a fracked up world right now.
If you’re saying that the RonPaulbot “side” of the TEA Party movement is aligned with the left, I’d counter that they aren’t really part of the movement — or at least they’re way on the fringe.
If you’re saying that the RonPaulbot AND TEA Party people are aligned with the left, well, then I’d disagree on the TEA Party side. To say the least...
I saw part of an interview with Assange. He said he offered the State Department a look at the material before the release. They refused.
But if some twerp private stationed in Iraq can access all this information then our security protocols need a little screwtiny.
Obama is supposed to be oh so intelligent.
He couldn't pour piss out of a boot if the instructions were written on the heel.
Why not just shoot him at the base of the skull with a .22 short?
And, he took out Romney when he stated the Mass health plan was just like his.
Not that it causes me any distress, but the guy IS busy taking out potential opponents.
His BIG problem is Palin. She's take every shot he and the media can deliver...and she's shooting back with a bigger gun...more accurately.
I can't wait for the second half of 2012...we're gonna see (political) war on a scale the nation has never before witnessed.
I NEVER thought I’d defend Hillary, but she seems to have her head screwed on straight about State secrets and the need for privacy with our allies.
Yep, my FRiend, you've just described Chicago politics perfectly. Anyone who will take the time to look will see that this has been the Kenyan's strategy from day one (back in the Illinois state elections).
Don’t you mean Soros tells Assange to call for Hillary’s resignation? Duh. Pre-empt 2012 by Soros. Obama, dictator for life and then UN chief for life.
Assange Calls for Clinton Resignation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Now we know why Obama has not acted swiftly to pe-empt Wikileaks on its past transgressions and on their latest espionage.
Assange is in the bag for Obama, and this proves Assange is in the Alinski network, and that he and Obama are hooked up.Obamas light talk of getting to Wikileaks is mere lip service.He has no intention of taking care of Assange to protect America’s diplomacy, or our warriors in Afghanistan.
Why didn’t Assange ask Obama to resign? Hillery Clinton is Obama’s biggest threat for his 2012 second term run. And Obama thinks he has just taken Clinton down.As Rush says, its time for more Operation Chaos.
74 posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:06:21 PM by Candor7
Possibly. But someone would have to do that leaking, which would make him/her a target as well. I don’t know. My gut feeling is that he is going to be taken out fast.
WTH! I can't believe posts on Free Republic concerning Hillary Clinton and the Wikileaks story! Freepers actually coming out on her side as if the spying had anything to do with national security. It did not! Seriously, take a look at the type of information that Clinton was seeking and ask yourself why she was interested in it and what it could be used for. Hillary was interested only in collecting dirt on foreign leaders to be used for LEVERAGE at a later date. This has always been this woman's M.O. as well as other democrat leaders. Why do you think Nancy Pelosi won her speakership back when it was in the dem parties absolute best interest to shake her off? She knows who has cash in the freezer and where the bodies are buried.
This is the highly touted Smart Power that will improve America's standing in the world? Seems it's nothing more that corrupt democrat machine politics on the world stage.
To me, this is the most logical explanation.
Although, Hillary has so many enemies in the world. It’s hard to single out just one as the culprit behind Assange.
Maybe Soros is the Master mason.....who knows, Clintoon can’t be happy about his wife under fire.
ZERO eliminates the competition, as the old saying goes “keep your friends close, and your enemies closer”....aahhh the democrat doublecross.
ROFLMTO.....the plot thickens. From where is Assange running this website? The interpol warrant for him went out this evening? Imagine, it only took his Wikileak threat to expose a bank to get the warrant in motion, but our national security didn’t move them at all.
I wonder when they catch this guy if he will have a ‘military’ trial... Is there not some law suit moving its way in court, personally holding John Ashcroft accountable for something he did?
I don't know. It's a little mysterious. Maybe they've come to the collective conclusion that someone has to take the fall to protect Obama, so it might as well be her.
"TIME says that Weaki founder Ass-ange said the dump was heavily redacted by his organization and the media working with them..."
From what I understand, some names were redacted and Assange tried to portray this as him wanting to protect the lives of people mentioned in those documents. The problem is that just because a name is blacked-out, it doesn't keep people from putting 2+2 together pretty quickly. Blacked-out or not, they're still in danger.
"I wonder when they catch this guy if he will have a military trial... "
The law is complicated in this regard. It's highly unlikely he'd face a military commission, and it's far from a certainty that he would be tried at all. This is due mostly to cases that sprung from the release of the Pentagon Papers almost 40-years ago. Prosecution is going to be an uphill battle.
"Is there not some law suit moving its way in court, personally holding John Ashcroft accountable for something he did?
You're probably referring to Abdullah al-Kidd v. John Ashcroft, et al.. It's an suit that has already been litigated for years. The nutty 9th held last year that it could move forward to trial, but Ashcroft has appealed that ruling. It will be years before this is resolved.
Orders from Clinton US Diplomats Told to Spy on Other Countries at United Nations
SPIEGEL ONLINE ^
This article claims there is a ‘directive’ signed by Hillary Clinton.... but Assange says IF “if it can be shown that she was responsible for ordering U.S. diplomatic figures to engage in espionage in the United Nations, in violation of the international covenants to which the U.S. has signed up.”
Assange or somebody acts like they are playing cat and mouse with Hillary... do they have the so called ‘signed’ directive or is some one calling her bluff?
It is rather strange that it seems as though the whole left world is closing in on Hillary... I, now have NO sympathy for the gal who believed that Richard Nixon should not have legal representation when she was helping the House write up Articles of Impeachment on President Nixon. I firmly believe what goes around comes around....
Now again there is no way to safely hedge a bet on Hillary, as I can think of no other modern woman that when scorned does not get her pound of flesh.
These liberals have for years said the way to fight terrorist is in a court room, and they attempted to set up their ‘world court’. Yet why on earth would these liberals want Assange tried in an American court, imagine the discovery would be enough to stop a few liberal hearts.
While it may well take years for the Ashcroft trial to be resolved, the precedence now is that a government official can be held to account personally for actions taken while in office... Right???
Old Bill has been amazingly quite over these past few days, yet he always had something to say when the media was holding President Bush over hot coals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.