Skip to comments.If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!
Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
But not behaviors. So the military can't discriminate against those who practice bestiality, adult consensual incest or even felons?
Robinson and Phelps are saying the same thing in different ways. Both are equally despicable.
Being against the repeal is the same as protesting at military funerals is the same how? Please explain.
Psychology (mindfigurin)has shown that sometimes when you really despise something, it is because you really want it. Sorry for flauntin my edjumacation.
So if I'm against adult consensual incest please explain how I really want it because I really don't.
Why are your talking points right out of the Homosexual Agenda Manual?
...just like my opinion has 'eff-all' to do with where I live. I read the NH papers daily; especially the opinions of the citizens in the 'reader's comments' section.
It's pretty apparent you haven't been following politics up here for the last couple of years.
ROTFLMAOPIMP!!! By the way...the Republicans were elected in NH based on fiscal concerns, not social issues. The DEMOCRAT Governor John Lynch, who SIGNED the 'gay marriage' bill; was RE-ELECTED by a comfortable margin.
Wonder what all those 'Free Staters' floding into NH think of 'gay marriage' and 'DADT'? Like I said...we will have to agree to disagree...my opinion and your opinion are just that...opinions. If and when 'gay marriage' is repealed, then you've got me. Have a sunny day.
Wow, that was a real shortcut to thinking.
Perhaps you are right. Perhaps we should round all homosexuals up and stick them in gas ovens.
If that doesn't speak to you on so many levels in so many ways ...
I want credit for the zot on this loser, I was the one that outed him. Many here do deserve the assist.
You are sickening. Likening those conservatives who oppose the homosexual agenda to Hitler's tactics and despicable acts is worse than disgusting.
Ah, the nazi reference. Soooo typical.
To ascertain the veracity of your statement, you need no more witness the flaming going on in this thread by Log Cabin tourists in common cause with the Leftist elements who have long sought to shut down FreeRepublic...
Yes, people who wanted freedom against the tyranny of a “my way or the highway king”
It seems you have an “agree or shut up” tact there, redcoat.
why will you not answer if you have served and why do you feel that you need to lecture vets and those serving if you have not?
Now where in the 1st amendment does it say that the military has to accept the homosexual agenda?
No, they willingly act like barnyard animals, KNOWING it is abhorrent making the barnyard animals more noble and less culpable.
Then how the hell can you proffer an opinion of the effects of DADT on military? You're looking from the outside.
I survived Hill 937 Dickweed! Don't tell me I should be “humbled” or ashamed of anything! There is NO way that we would have survived that knowing some fagot might be exchanging aids infested/perverted blood with us!
Whew! And I made it through them all without commenting (until now).
4-square behind JR.
I get it, but, I disagree with both of his premises. Is that ok?
Thanks. I’d like to believe that I try to be thoughtful, mature and well-reasoned. I know I don’t always succeed, but I hope the effort is appreciated.
just saw the posts now where you state you have never served and yet you feel you need to lecture us on who are and have.
You know nothing on how combat units work, how we look at things , how we live, how we train so until you do then find out, serve and then come back instead of pushing yuour pro homo crap.
Really, and we’ve been waiting for you all this time!
She’s one of the Equestrian types. She’s also a libertarian who doesn’t care about any sort of behavior whatsoever. Its this apahetic atitude that so many people have, just letting people be deviant for the sake of it. People are tempted by things every day but I able to control them and I wish other could do the same. I am no angel of course, I am a non-believer firstmost and I am young. However, people need to value “traditional” family values and not let America turn into a PC land where anyone who is for good ethics in life and living well is criticized and attacked.
Libertarians are those(not all but it seems to be their inclination) people who perpeuate the slipperly slope these days. One day its homosexuality, then its something else. There have to be some limits in this western nation. I pray(Yes I did say that. I really mean hope) that America does not turn into defenseless Europe.
“...we should round all homosexuals up and stick them in gas ovens...”
For reference see:
Reductio ad Hitlerum...
Argumentum ad Nazium...
Playing the Nazi card...
Godwin’s law: “given enough time, all online discussionsregardless of topic or scopeinevitably end up being about Hitler and the Nazis.”
I see your username (at least the first part of it) fits you well.
Now some may say what they do is their own business. Well in 4 years at least 8 Couples were found engaging in their illegal under the UCMJ acts either in the rack or showers TOGETHER. Other not so in the Closet Queens were making hits on the mess decks. So No It Does Not Work. They were flown off ASAP upon discover for THEIR safety. This wasn't the PC Navy of today BTW this was U.S. Navy late 1970's when policy was clear about Queers.
They don't like that name Queer or others? Gee I'm so sorry. Ok I'm not LOL. They ruined once very common and good descriptive words like gay to use in a deception of their destructive lifestyle.
Seems some in here are not quite up to date on Biblical Scriptures either. They need to read Genesis chapters 18-19. Now Lot wasn't a nice man as we find out late in chapter 19. But look at Lot's wrong compared to the ones of which GOD destroyed two cities. Hello out there anyoner reading that? The act was so serious Lot offered the men at his door his daughters so his guest which were angels of GOD would not be man raped. IOW Gay is an abomination before GOD.
I want harm any Homo as long as they stay out of my life and way from my family. I won't hunt them down. But I'm sick and tired of them flaunting their destructive life style in such a manner you can not ignore it. Why do they do this? Any Pro-Gay want to answer? If they went about their businness like sane rational people who would know? No one would. That's the point. They won't.
The United States Armed Forces does in fact not enjoy many of the Constitutional Rights as some in here say or think. It is in fact a government within a government overseen by congress to regulate it. Many things that would be Unconstitutional as a civilian apply in the military including Double Jeopardy trials by the military under the UCMJ for crimes you may commit in the civilian world after receiving a civilian trial punishment. Don't like it? Don't serve. Simple enough?
Do you truly believe that their nature and behavior make them non-human?
Dawkinists. I despise each and every one of them. If you're one of them, you have no business here. None.
There is a HUGE difference between incest and homosexuality. Incest is both morally and genetically wrong. You can not equate the two.
You seem to be drawing your posts from the logicjumpin-exaggeratin-Ad hominem-strawman-Biblethumpin’ and free banjo jamboree playbook.
I’m in complete amazement the poster is still here.
One has to draw the line somewhere. And a couple of pitchers of beer tend to blur that line. ;-)
it is and I can only speak for me but homosexuals used to say that their life was private , well OK then keep it private.
Do not go around telling folks what turns you on sexually.
It is all about sex even though they say otherwise.
Love, well I love many but feel no need to have sex.
But for them to say they can now hold hands , dress like women and be open about their sexual preference on base is wrong and will only cause trouble.
I admit that up ion the north east there are far many more homosexuals and I know a few but when I saw them at a parade it showed me how they act one way in front of the likes of me and then act another when they are with their pals.
Don’t ask was wrong, you should not base getting a job based on sexual preference but it was done and it kept their lives private. Now they say they do not want to be private they want to be open.
Doing this will bring so many problems and how many pro’s will it bring?
Basing civil rights like they do on a sexual preference is just stupid IMHO .
They are not born that way there is no gene, nature never intended for them to carry on the human species.
As for hating them by some.
It’;s hating their agenda, it;s how they are now in your face etc.
Anyway hope you and your family are well up there and have a merry Christmas to you and your family.
Oh, so holy.
You still miss the point. On this subject, there IS no gray area. It’s AC versus DC. Positive versus negative. There is no moderate or middle ground in regards to this issue.
If you believe this is not true, then you might consider finding some other forum to Troll on. This one is already locked and loaded. But go ahead, keep on shaking the barrel of this weapon from the end that points down range. You seem to welcome the inevitable outcome.
Please add me to the list.
I can’t contribute much (too poor, too old, etc.), but maybe I can help out locally as a precinct chair.
I’m not happy with Cornyn and Hutchison. Their RINO leanings have been exposed.
Let me know if you think I can help.
Oh, I am using a little thing I like to call the Constitution. The law on its face allows Gays to serve. That is actually ALL I am saying.
My old unit gave me that name for a reason. I wear it proudly.
We’ll see how this shakes out.
I’ve been reading about the regulations regarding PACs in Texas and it’s got me dizzy.
There’s a difference when you have an atheist who actively supports rationalism and one who doesn’t. I don’t go around telling people that Christianity is some fake, dumb myth made by old men. I have been to church before and the experience was beautiful, especially with some of the speeches of the pastor. I do not seek to get rid of religion at all. I hate the so-called American Association of Atheists or whatever its called due to disrespect of the Christian religion and treating it like some 3-cent fable. I love religion but I need to figure out if God really exists.
It will probably be a quest throughout this century, getting harder and harder as people begin to unjustly destroy faith.
Is that what he said? Because I thought he said this:
" No, they willingly act* like barnyard animals"
Misconstruing another member's post is deception.
*emphasis is mine.
Standards of what is wrong change.
Homosexualism is a word that describes the leftist perverted homosexual political movement. Homosexualism is not a civil right, it’s a perversion. I will have conservatives on FR. Liberalism is not practiced here. Sorry to see you go, but go you will if you preach the liberal lie.
The homosexual agenda and lifestyle killed my brother from Aids. This is a matter of life and death, not free expression. Spiritual law and natural law trump perversion.
Okay. Enjoy the skittles and unicorns...the conservatives will keep packing.
Works for me. Except, I recall using Shinola as a kid. I guess that makes me one of those who COULD tell the s___ from Sninola...
I am basing this on THE CONSTITUTION. There is nothing in THE CONSTITUTION to support a ban of homosexuals in the military. Furthermore, the 14th amendment affords equal protection to ALL.
What I said in the previous post about standards changing. His rationale that Homosexuality is not a peversion is ridicalous because one can argue the same thing for incest. Some things are just not ethical at all.
Homosexuality just weakens the social structure of the country, leading us to being more alienated from each other.
God bless you and all that were there. Thank you. Sorry you have to debate with these dweebs. Makes me f-ing sick.
Stop with the hyperbole. Jim specifically said "If you support the homosexual agenda...."
Newspapers all across the country are flat-out LYING about DADT.
For example, the front page of my paper (the Toledo Blade) has this headline today:
Senate Ends Military's Ban On Gays
So if you're gay you haven't been able to serve in the military the past 17 years?
That's what the headline implies and it's a lie.
BOTTOM LINE: We need a new media. And anyone here who thinks FNC is "new media" and is doing more help (vs. harm) to conservatives is being fooled, but it's not surprising.
Increasingly, FNC's guests and their commentary is aligning more and more to what you'd except from CNN and MSNBC.
FNC was decent up until 2004 or so, but currently the only show I can stomach on that network is Glenn Beck.