Skip to comments.If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!
Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
I’ve seen a different side of FR today that somehow I missed before and I just cannot be a part of it. It is time for me to leave the forum.
***And yet, you’re still here as well. Maybe the zot generator is working on some kind of delay.
You consistently and conveniently ignore the jackbooted thuggism of the homsoexual agenda. Our rights of freedom of religion, speech and association are already - right now - curtailed due to the homosexual agenda, and it’s only getting worse.
You pretend for some reason not to see this. You aren’t dumb, so it’s not that you can’t read well. There have been many, many hundreds of articles about the infringements on our rights from the advancement of the homosexual agenda for years and years. Have you somehow managed to avoid reading any of those aritcles? That’s hard to believe.
Question: Is “faggotry” a word?
Answer: If it ain’t, it oughta be.
Well, that’s the entire point of this exercise. If you push the homosexual agenda (which I feel is a repugnant Marxist attack on our God-given constitutional rights) on FR, your account here will get the zot.
Pretty simple. Either you is or you ain’t, baby.
Crikey, you found better stuff than I did.
What is a political action committee?
The term “political action committee” (PAC) refers to two distinct types of political committees registered with the FEC: separate segregated funds (SSFs) and nonconnected committees. Basically, SSFs are political committees established and administered by corporations, labor unions, membership organizations or trade associations. These committees can only solicit contributions from individuals associated with connected or sponsoring organization. By contrast, nonconnected committees—as their name suggests—are not sponsored by or connected to any of the aforementioned entities and are free to solicit contributions from the general public. For additional information, consult our Separate Segregated Funds and Nonconnected Committees fact sheet.
Are the titles chosen for SSFs and nonconnected PACs subject to different requirements?
Yes. The Act and Commission Regulations require an SSF to include the name of its sponsoring organization in its official title. 2 U.S.C. §432(e)(5); 11 CFR 102.14(c). The Act places no such restriction on the title that an nonconnected PAC uses. Neither committee, however, may include the name of a candidate in its title.
May both an SSF and an nonconnected PAC contribute up to $5,000 to each of a candidates election campaigns?
Yes. Provided the SSF or the nonconnected PAC has qualified as a multicandidate committee by having:
1. been registered with the Commission at least six months,
2. received contributions from over 50 persons, and
3. made contributions to at least five candidates for federal office.
2 U.S.C. §441a(a)(5).
What other requirements of the Act and FEC Regulations apply to both SSFs and nonconnected PACs?
Most of the basic requirements of the Act and Regulations are the same for SSFs and nonconnected political committees. For example, the prohibitions and limits on contributions apply equally to both SSFs and nonconnected PACs. In addition, both types of committees must fulfill the same basic recordkeeping and reporting requirements, although an SSF does not have to report operating expenses paid for by its sponsoring organization (see above). Finally, SSFs and nonconnected PACs may support candidates in the same ways, that is, by making monetary and in-kind contributions to candidates, by contributing to their political parties and by making independent expenditures to support or oppose candidates.
How do I start a nonconnected PAC?
Nonconnected PACs must register by filing FEC Form 1 [PDF], Statement of Organization within 10 days after raising or spending in excess of $1,000 in connection with federal elections. Such PACs should download the Campaign Guide for Nonconnected Committees [PDF] for more information on the laws that apply to them.
toolkit Download our Nonconnected PAC Registration Toolkit
The complete package of forms and other information necessary to register a committee with the FEC.
When do I need to report my PAC’s receipts and disbursements?
After registering with the FEC, PACs must file regular reports disclosing their receipts and disbursements. PACs have the option to file these reports quarterly or monthly, and may change their filing frequency as often as once a year. PACs that choose to file quarterly may be required to file certain pre- and post-election reports, depending on their activity. Please consult our reporting page for more information.
Name some names.
It’s a word.
It is what I have been not able to communicate as my views as well.
We all have choices who we have in our lives.
Like smokers they are free to smoke but not in or on our property.
My son just cannot tolerate the smell and even chooses not to go often to the Indian Casinos as it makes him ill.
And likewise if my sons’ severe disability is offensive to any business we want to go to we simply don't if not welcomed.
Fortunately that has not happened to many times.
Either he wasn’t teachable or didn’t listen but ‘Doing the right thing’ taught by his dad obviously didn’t include standing by his word. That would be a conservative trait.
He can call people names but no one else should - liberalism!!
It’s a good time to clean them out since they outed themselves, IMO. Isn’t it nice to see when homosexuality is the topic, the ‘rats run to the cheese wearing a christian cape as a disguise.
Keep up the good work Jim we all love and support you 100%
It's all in the perception, toots.
what you said...and i believe hell is at least gettin a *hard* frost over the homo successes ...
But it's simple, really -- LIBERALS ALWAYS LIE!
Their self-loathing probably has something to do with it, but who really cares? They just lie. They dissemble. They evade. They equivocate. They spin. They edit. THEY LIE! It's just what they do.
All the best!
I believe there are about 3 to 4 different types. I found the definition of the types last night. I'll look and see if I can find them again and I'll post them.
May both an SSF and an nonconnected PAC contribute up to $5,000 to each of a candidates election campaigns?
Yes. Haven't check out the difference between the two. However, it appears to me that nonconnected PACs can spend much more if they are not in collusion with the candidate(s) while they support his or her candidacy as in producing tv commercials that support their viewpoints or possibly even directly naming them in the political ad thanks to court ruling or two, and the SCOTUS case Citizens United.
Recommended reading here from the FEC:
Nonconnected PAC Registration Toolkit
- FEC Form 1 - Statement of Organization [PDF]
- Screen-fillable FEC Form 1 [PDF]
- Screen fillable FEC Form 1 with audio instructions [PDF]
- Committee Treasurers Brochure [PDF]
- Campaign Guide for Nonconnected Committees [PDF]
- Compliance with Laws Outside the FEC's Jurisdiction [PDF]
- Special Notices on Political Ads and Solicitations Brochure [PDF]
- Partnerships Brochure [PDF]
From this page:
Oh, man. It’s worse than I thought.
Wow, LJ. Even someone keying up on you about something else gets the zot today. I didn’t realize you had such high status here on FR.
I'm no fag...nor hypocritical, like you and yours.
Sad to see you and this site turn ridiculous.
Zot me, Bruno.
You need to preach it to the homosexuals and their lobby.
For it is they who are our schools, on our TVs, in our theaters, music, fashion, in our politics, in our healthcare, and in our churches, telling our children and young people that anal sex is natural and normal. And yet you derisively tell us to stay out of “gay” bars?
WE are surrounded by them daily, they have demands and punishments for us, legal and fiscal, among others. THEY are trying making “life rough” for us, not the other way around. And yet you imply that all we have to do is just “not watch them”? As if we do watch them?
Why chastise Freepers? We did not start this fire.
Sorry Jim, I've been dying to do that ;)
Thank you, roses of sharon.
I’m sorry, but your opus has received a failing grade.
Gays in the military is one of the least important issues facing our nation, IMHO.
Zot me, Bruno.
***Another freepercide. I don’t think the original bugzapper thread had this many freepercides by this time.
LOL - so now we're Obama-paid? One blogpimp insisted we were Soros-funded. Gee, I can't keep straight who it is that's paying us.
Let me set the record straight.
We don't like to see people shamelessly pimping their blogs and using FR as a vehicle to get income-generating blog hits.
If someone has a good blog and some information to share, they should post it here on FR in its entirety instead of excerpting for the sole purpose of driving traffic to their blogs.
If the blog is good, people will bookmark it and read it regularly.
But when people post teasers and include videos (for which they erroneously take credit), but require you to click on their blogs in order to access the video or commentary, the intent is pretty obvious.
And referring to the one blogpimp as "the biggest fighter of Islam on FR" is a bit hyperbolic, don't you think? That FReeper is certainly impressed with himself and does enough self-promotion on his own.
We have active military FReepers who are in dangerous locations, doing the heavy lifting. I'd say our soldiers who are fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan are the bigger fighters of Islam, for starters. What they do is a lot more difficult than writing some blog and thumping their chests about how they are risking your life to do this. Sheeesh.
"Basically, SSFs are political committees established and administered by corporations, labor unions, membership organizations or trade associations. These committees can only solicit contributions from individuals associated with connected or sponsoring organization. By contrast, nonconnected committeesas their name suggestsare not sponsored by or connected to any of the aforementioned entities and are free to solicit contributions from the general public. For additional information, consult our Separate Segregated Funds and Nonconnected Committees fact sheet."
The examples that comes to mind...that (SSFs)labor unions use funds raised from 'union dues' and corporations use 'profits' to support political candidates, while FR would be soliciting from the general public, which would fall under being a nonconnected committee.
Zot me, Bruno.
Sometimes less is more. You could have simply stated you were a useful idiot.
And just this ONE thread proves you right! Never mind about the MSM and history.
What is in their heart comes out of their mouth. Like they say keep a sucker talking long enough and he hangs himself.
And they are such drama queens who are so easily offended who constantly offend everyone else. LOL! All their spinning and deception makes them dizzy - I think it robs them of oxygen; thus the mental disorder.
lol...well look who’s back. Haven’t seen your illegal-alien-apologist ass around here in a few years.
Please add me to the list of those interested in this PAC.
Wasn't homosexuality classified as a 'mental illness' until the mid 70's or so?
Yeah, so what if the disgusting and anti-Constitutional homosexual agenda is shoved down millions of more peoples’ throats and our military weakened.
But there is such a thing as "obsessive compulsion", which is a psychological phenomenon. People are compelled by emotional needs, regardless of their source, to repeatedly do things they know to be unwise, unhealthy, or simply unsatisfying. At that point, they can choose (free will) to either resist or give in. Most give in because they lack social support mechanisms that might help them resist their urges or psychological counseling that might help them understand and control their compulsions.
Worse, there are cases such as the one you cite, where the young and vulnerable are manipulated for the political or personal ends of others and offered poison in place of medicine. I'm convinced there's a special circle in Hell for people who prey on the innocent.
Homosexuality exists in many species as a matter of autonomic compulsion in the absence of suitable opposite sex partners. That's not the case with people, who unlike other animals possess voluntary consciousness and reasoning ability. And yet, those unique abilities may be overcome by inexplicable need. They simply cannot help the way they feel. I've seen three year-old boys instinctively pick up toy guns. I've seen others pick up their older sisters' makeup kits. It just happens, and there's always a reason, but chances are: you're never going to know. They're all human and they are all God's children. Whether they belong in the Army is another matter, entirely...
Paul bot eh?
No problem. Bye (again).
Your home page is awesome.
He ain't "back" no more....
Not that I am shedding a tear mind you.
It is done.
LOL - I wish. Stultis and JR had “words” not long ago and got a stern warning. I’m sure JR remembered him well, it wasn’t long ago.
For additional information, consult our Separate Segregated Funds and Nonconnected Committees fact sheet."
That can be found here.
"SSFs and Nonconnected PACs"
Golly. What’s wrong with shoving your pee-pee up another’s poo-poo and ingesting fecal matter as a part of your ‘love-making ritual?
After all, it’s all about our children!
IMO JimRobs 'pushback' is nothing more than standing firm against the incremental and in-yer-face assault of our Republic by an overall commie agenda, a part of which is gay 'rights'...
sticks and stones...Ive been called plenty of names...boo friggin hooo...
simply put, there is no 'debate' to be had with the pro queer agenda, for them its constant assault, so the only debate is to acknowledge that we'll never agree...I dont seek out a fight with any pro commie/anti God group, but i refuse to retreat any further in the name of fairness...because i receive no quarter or respect from those on the other side...
if ya dont like it here, you are FRee to leave...
I’ve had my head in the books all day. Just got to your post. Have you read any of the stuff to which you linked? Should we split it up between us? I planned to write a summary for the group. Thoughts?
You blogpimp hatin’ war profiteer you!
"In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder. The American Psychological Association Council of Representatives followed in 1975."
Imho, they bowed to pressure from homosexual organizations.
Do these sentiments on a conservative site surprise you? You’ve been here long enough to know better. ...unless you only visit here occasionally.
***A lot of long term freepers getting the zot lately. I think they signed up in the 2000 election cycle timeframe because they were looking for the best GOP website, rather than the best CONSERVATIVE website.
The time has come to re-examine the idealogical litmus matrix that I’ve proposed several times here on FR.
I would like to see an idealogy litmus matrix here on Free Republic, but when I proposed it to Jimrob, he called me a newbie.
To: babygene I dont think hes all that interested.
To: MHGinTN It doesnt matter what a FReeper thinks. Its just a list that they tell us what they think. That way we can tell who were dealing with.
To: Jim Robinson Hah hah, thats great. I signed up 2 months after you and Im a newbie. Back then no one even said, Welcome to FR. But yeah, I do think that there are tons of RINOs. To be more accurate, the term would be CINOs.
Ive been pushing for an idealogical litmus matrix here on FR, not to get rid of RINOs but to expose them.
THE GOP DOESNT WANT US- SO WHATS NEXT?
***It simply takes too long. Look at this thread alone. I see evidence of RINOism in some of the FReepers on this thread. It takes 700 posts to drill down. We need the matrix posted and available so that we dont have to drill down on every FReeping thread. Theyre wasting our time. Deliberately.
Agreed to a large degree. Perhaps a way to rate members by other members???
762 posted on Thursday, February 07, 2008 8:43:23 PM by roamer_1
130 posted on Monday, December 08, 2008 2:39:20 PM by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
49 posted on Monday, December 22, 2008 7:29:27 PM by Kevmo ( Its all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies] 48 posted on Thursday, November 26, 2009 10:25:08 PM by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)