Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sachs: 'Victor Davis Hanson Has Done More Harm To American People' Than Any Other Commentator
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 12/23/2010 6:07:54 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

Jeffrey Sachs has attacked distinguished military historian Victor Davis Hanson as an "extremist" who "has done more harm to the American people" than any other commentator.

Sachs, a Columbia prof and income redistributionist supreme, launched his surprising verbal assault in commenting on Hanson's National Review Online column, "The Obamites' About-Face." Hanson there makes the case that out of political pragmatism, Obama has flip-flopped on everything from "the environment, radical Islam, taxes, stimulus, the economy, national security" to foreign policy.

View video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: extremism; jeffreysachs; vdh; victordavishanson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

Victor Davis Hanson - somebody.
Jeffrey Sach-munch - nobody.


21 posted on 12/23/2010 6:29:17 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat
I treasure everything that Victor David Hanson writes.

I have no use for a crypto communist like Sachs. On the other hand, Hanson is a neo con, and one of those who argued us into the position we are in where we are overstreached and bankrupt. Dr. Hanson knows and knew far better than that because he wrote about the collapse of the Athenian empire when they became overstretched and started to defend the periphery, which they could not afford, thereby losing the core of their Empire and existence.

A lot of the time Dr. Hanson writes tellingly, but no competent scholar would make the egregious error that he made. We are going to be paying for Bush's escapades for several decades.

22 posted on 12/23/2010 6:29:27 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
“Because the constitution doesn’t allow the federal government to tax wealth. Fortunately.”

I think they figured out a way. They call it the death tax.

23 posted on 12/23/2010 6:30:46 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Because the constitution doesn’t allow the federal government to tax wealth. Fortunately.

That's not the reason.

24 posted on 12/23/2010 6:31:21 AM PST by mewzilla (Hey, Schumer, how's that Lockerbie bomber deal investigation coming along?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
That's still not the reason :)

There are 535 examples of why we don't go where the money is sitting right there on Capitol Hill.

25 posted on 12/23/2010 6:32:38 AM PST by mewzilla (Hey, Schumer, how's that Lockerbie bomber deal investigation coming along?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Have you ever has a chance to look through the financial disclosure form members of the House and Senate file?

If pols were taxed based on their wealth instead of the income, they might not be so eager to keep raising taxes.

26 posted on 12/23/2010 6:35:34 AM PST by mewzilla (Hey, Schumer, how's that Lockerbie bomber deal investigation coming along?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

How much longer before we take away this soft, nondemanding, wholly unproductive lifestyle from these no-talent Commie “professors”.

Their easy, safe and protected existence is largely provided on our backs after all.


27 posted on 12/23/2010 6:39:09 AM PST by EyeGuy (RaceMarxist Obama: The Politics of Vengeance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
“I've got a question for the income redistributionist: If that's what you really want, why do progressives tax income and not wealth?”

####

A very valid question.

Taxing wealth, while probably not totally fair (I'd have to think about it), is MUCH better than taxing income, even with a flat RATE scheme, which is usually mistakenly referred to as a “Flat Tax”.

28 posted on 12/23/2010 6:42:45 AM PST by EyeGuy (RaceMarxist Obama: The Politics of Vengeance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Sachs is quite an screwball if he really thinks that telling the truth does harm.

Just my opinion of course.


29 posted on 12/23/2010 6:44:04 AM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Sachs is spelled wrong, I have it on good authority that it’s “u”, not an “a.”


30 posted on 12/23/2010 6:47:36 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012: don't retreat, just reload)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Soros could have not have wreaked the havoc he did in Eastern Europe, without Jeffrey Sachs and his “shock therapy”. These cruel individuals continue to boast about it. What better example of Sachs than to witness him taking the good character of another - it’s what Marxists do in order to hide their own evil.


31 posted on 12/23/2010 6:50:38 AM PST by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
VDH is the absolute best. An educator that used to lean left, then grew up. And boy did he grow into a fine guy.

And someone like VDH understands what passes for leftist thinking far better than anyone who has never been a liberal. That makes for very insightful commentary.

32 posted on 12/23/2010 6:51:05 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Like 0bama, Sachs is a stooge of George Soros.

Googling “Jeffrey Sachs” and “George Soros” pulls up a plethora of articles linking the two.


33 posted on 12/23/2010 6:52:48 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

They tax both.

Lots of areas & states also have ‘personal property taxes’ on everything they own.


34 posted on 12/23/2010 6:54:15 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Because what they truly want is a feudalist system.
They don’t want anyone else accumulating wealth.


35 posted on 12/23/2010 6:55:11 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I’m a huge VDH fan, and I must say to Professor Hanson, You must be doing something right; you know you’re over the target when you’re taking flak.


36 posted on 12/23/2010 6:57:08 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Which part of the American populace dreamed up “Trusts’ to be put into place instead of just plain wills?????

I want to know who will eventually have to pay the taxes that this generation of people with trusts are so fond of?

I have a neighbor who insists that he needed a trust because probate would drag out for tens of years on his estate!!!

The man has a small property with a 35 ++ year old manufactured home on it, 2 trucks which don’t total $15,000 in calue, a very old llama & a pasture pet horse.

His entire estate isn’t worth $30,000 & he tries to talk like he ‘had to get a trust’ & so should everybody else!!!


37 posted on 12/23/2010 6:59:06 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

The answer is easy if you go back to the book (Marx’s The Communist Manifesto)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Marx takes care wealth in Rule 3
3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.

Rule 4 is where they come for us.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.


38 posted on 12/23/2010 6:59:17 AM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

“Lots of areas & states also have ‘personal property taxes’ on everything they own.”

####

Here in Missouri the thieving PP Tax is just on cars, boats and motorcycles I believe.

Do you mean there are some states that actually scour the entire personal balance sheet?


39 posted on 12/23/2010 6:59:40 AM PST by EyeGuy (RaceMarxist Obama: The Politics of Vengeance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

A younger looking version of total Lefty Robert Redford.


40 posted on 12/23/2010 6:59:52 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson