Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charities With the Highest Administrative Costs
Mainstreet ^ | 12/26/10 | Greg Blocquet

Posted on 12/26/2010 12:31:28 PM PST by Mikey_1962

1. American Tract Society

Administrative expenses: 68.0%

Topping the list of America’s worst charities is an organization that spent more than $1.6 million dollars on its administrative expenses in 2007, over twice what it spent the previous year.

2. Boys Choir of Harlem

Administrative expenses: 66.3%

Long-respected for its role in improving the lives of disadvantaged and impoverished young people in Harlem, New York, the Boys Choir of Harlem went all the way to the White House, performing for sitting presidents since Lyndon Johnson.

3. National Council of Negro Women (NCNW)

Administrative expenses: 64%

Serving as an umbrella organization for 39 national and local advocacy groups for women of African descent both in the U.S. and abroad, the National Council of Negro Women coordinates its activities with partners in 34 states.

4. Union Rescue Mission, Little Rock

Administrative expenses: 62.1%

Arkansas’s Union Rescue Mission is the first charity on the list whose administrative expenses reached over 60 percent of total expenses for the last reported year. The Mission’s goals are of the highest importance, targeting hunger, victims of abuse, and people struggling with addiction in Arkansas and her neighboring states, which it pursues through the efforts of a few key Baptist reverends.

5. Cherokee National Historical Society

Administrative expenses: 58.2%

Dedicated to preserving the history and traditions of the Cherokee people, the Cherokee National Historical Society, based in Oklahoma, is the fifth-most inefficient charity in the United States

(Excerpt) Read more at mainstreet.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Mikey_1962
Looks to me like 501C3's to aid the disadvantaged being disadvantaged by the disadvantaged that run the 501C3's.

In short, screw your bro.

....the Jesse Jackson model!

21 posted on 12/26/2010 1:40:11 PM PST by HardStarboard (I'm sure George and Dick had quiet smiles while watching the election results!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye
few key Baptist reverends.

I've never known a white Baptist Pastor who consented to be called "Reverend" - Pastor, Brother, Preacher but not Reverend.

22 posted on 12/26/2010 1:59:15 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

You got my thoughts exactly.


23 posted on 12/26/2010 2:11:38 PM PST by TexasRedeye (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
Were any of Charlie Rangle or Maxine Waters' kin involved in the administration of any of these "CHARITIES"? If so, I am not surprised,because Charlie and Maxine both believe charity begins at home.

vaudine

24 posted on 12/26/2010 2:14:29 PM PST by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

Is the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) on the bad charity list? Morris Dees and his few top employees take out high salaries, what they call education expense is all the fund raising literature they send out and little goes to anything else.


25 posted on 12/26/2010 2:20:25 PM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I have never heard of a white “Reverend” either. Maybe it’s a Black thing.


26 posted on 12/26/2010 2:36:53 PM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
"or that single out minorities for their aid recipients"

Wait a minute; without the aid to THAT particular group, Democrats would be out of business, and tons of black "activists" would be un-needed!

Then again, we'd save Billions of taxpayer wealth-redistribution dollars for sure!

27 posted on 12/26/2010 3:12:05 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seemoAR; Graybeard58

A number of denominations use “Reverend” as a courtesy prefix for clergy: “The Reverend Mr. Lastname” or “Reverend Father Lastname” are the equivalent of elected officials’ being “The Honorable Representative Lastname.” The titles are used in the addressing of letters, and that’s about it.

You call your congresscritter “Congressman” or “Representative” or “Mister,” in every other usage, and most people call their clergy “Father” or “Deacon” or “Mister” or “Pastor.” Baptists seem to me to be more likely than other groups to address a pastor as “Reverend,” in speech, as in “Reverend Graham,” but I’ve never heard any use “reverends” in this way as a plural noun. They would say “pastors” to identify a group of church leaders.


28 posted on 12/26/2010 3:15:56 PM PST by Tax-chick (Coming soon: Anoreth's Absolutely Amazing Airport Adventure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

The Silver Star Families of America, an organization that assists the wounded, ill and dying of the Armed Forces from
all wars, runs less that 5% admin.

And it is actually in their by laws.

Check out charity financial pages before you donate to see how transparant they are.


29 posted on 12/26/2010 3:17:31 PM PST by Steve Newton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT

With a salary of $303,936 a year, all I can say is that Mo Dees is living well. It must be good to be oppressed.


30 posted on 12/26/2010 3:26:49 PM PST by InABunkerUnderSF (Anyone who has read Roman history knows a barbarian invasion when they see one in progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

So?


31 posted on 12/26/2010 3:49:38 PM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I agree, I agree!!!

Reverend is an adjective, and your reference to politicians
is fine. You wouldn’t address your Senator by saying,
“Well Honorable, I disagree with you.”


32 posted on 12/26/2010 4:27:55 PM PST by Ed Condon (Give 'em a heading, an altitude, and a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

You can’t trust government stats with things like that because of the way government accounting goes.

I doubt if the SSA numbers are comparable to private industry.


33 posted on 12/26/2010 4:34:18 PM PST by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: seemoAR

La.


34 posted on 12/26/2010 4:40:01 PM PST by Tax-chick (Coming soon: Anoreth's Absolutely Amazing Airport Adventure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ed Condon

Exactly. Nor would you say, “Several of the honorables were indicted in Wake County last week.”


35 posted on 12/26/2010 4:43:53 PM PST by Tax-chick (Coming soon: Anoreth's Absolutely Amazing Airport Adventure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Baptists seem to me to be more likely than other groups to address a pastor as “Reverend,” in speech, as in “Reverend Graham,”

I'm 65, Baptist my entire life and have known many Baptist Pastors and have never met a Baptist Pastor who wanted to be addressed by the title "Reverend".

I've never met Sharpton or Jackson and don't even know if they claim to be Baptist.

News people refer to them as Reverend.

36 posted on 12/26/2010 7:44:32 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

My current Pastor has an earned doctorate, (As opposed to an honorary one) and prefers to be called brother Bobby.


37 posted on 12/26/2010 7:47:19 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Just going from the general media. References to Billy Graham and his son Franklin Graham always say “Reverend Graham,” as if that’s what you’d say if you met either man in person.

Would real people (non-journalists) say Mr. Graham?


38 posted on 12/26/2010 7:48:30 PM PST by Tax-chick (Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Our Puerto Rican deacon, “Reverend Mr. Rafael Fuentes,” according to the bulletin, goes by “Brother Rafael.”


39 posted on 12/26/2010 7:49:47 PM PST by Tax-chick (Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye; seemoAR

Please see my number 36 and 37 reply


40 posted on 12/26/2010 7:50:09 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson