Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitch Daniels: Truce Directed at Liberals, Not for Social Conservatives
lifenews ^

Posted on 12/28/2010 2:55:21 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27

Indiana governor Mitch Daniels has given yet another interview in which he talks about a social issues truce he put forward this summer that upset pro-life conservatives.

The interview with WANE follows on the one he gave the Indianapolis Star in which he appeared to shift position and suggest the truce was meant for liberals, not social conservatives concerned about issues like abortion.

In the Star interview, Daniels suggested the truce was meant for liberal activists like those who favored repealing the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy — and he continued that line of thinking in the WANE question and answer session.

(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: daniels; mitch

1 posted on 12/28/2010 2:55:26 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

He’s spinning like a top. Not a good sign.


2 posted on 12/28/2010 2:59:29 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“...a social issues truce he put forward this summer that upset pro-life conservatives.”

How did the pro-death liberals like it?


3 posted on 12/28/2010 3:00:10 PM PST by jessduntno ("'How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think." - Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No, it’s not a good sign.

If he just said what he really thinks he’d probably make more sense.


4 posted on 12/28/2010 3:02:53 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Yeah, not sure I buy that one. We’ll see in the debates.


5 posted on 12/28/2010 3:03:16 PM PST by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Looks like he checked which way the political winds are blowing and decided to ‘adjust’ his socially-liberal ways. We don’t need a half conservative, we need full conservatives.


6 posted on 12/28/2010 3:06:09 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (Fire all the damn rino!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Daniels is a strong conservative.

His remarks were blown WAY out of context.

7 posted on 12/28/2010 3:09:31 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

IF he really meant this latest version, why did he not explain it that way on his first couple of attempts?


8 posted on 12/28/2010 3:10:28 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Unless he says he can he see Chicago from Ft. Wayne, he belongs on the short list. At 5’-7”, he’s probably too short anyway.


9 posted on 12/28/2010 3:11:36 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This has been out there for weeks, why wait?? It is too late even if its wrong because opinions are already formed. If this is true then he is too thick and slow to ever consider for President.

Although I think the stories were right in the first place and he’s not on our side.


10 posted on 12/28/2010 3:15:01 PM PST by GeronL (#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Voted for him and liked him because of his conservatism. I totally disagreed with his nanny state do-goodism by banning smoking (outdoors!) on government property. Indoors, OK, but outdoors?


11 posted on 12/28/2010 3:17:00 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Ya right I got that... sure ... Why not ... I believe him.....NOT!!!!!!


12 posted on 12/28/2010 3:17:32 PM PST by Breto (never accept the premise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
The Leftwingtards responded to the idea of a "truce" ~ which necessarily includes them giving up their favorite social(ist) agenda ~ WITH TOTAL SILENCE.

A couple of them may have fed the to get some Conservatives to criticize him ~ but silence speaks in this case, and they did not say "yes".

Actually, there's no hope of converting the Leftwingtards to the cause of truth, justice and the American way of life.

13 posted on 12/28/2010 3:20:14 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

They say he has been successful in Indianapolis, but isn’t he tied to that awful Lugar?


14 posted on 12/28/2010 3:25:19 PM PST by Theodore R. (Rush was right when he said America may survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This latest version doesn’t really make sense.

A truce involves both sides of a dispute.

If just one side concedes then that’s a surrender.


15 posted on 12/28/2010 3:39:47 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Yeah, Mitch Daniels Presidential aspirations are dead before they even began. His efforts to distance himself from Social Conservatives have been ongoing and continuous for months, while at the same time he shamelessly reaches out to every RINO and Liberal special interest he can shake hands with.

This man is NO Conservative. It’s one thing to build consensus. It’s quite another to surrender former principles and eschew old friends in order to accept new beliefs and embrace new “friends” for the sake of political advancement. There’s an old saying where I come from — “Dance with the one who brung ya.” Well, Daniels, like SO MANY OTHER Establishment Republicans, has ignored that wisdom. And they ain’t gonna be at the dance in 2012 as anything more than wallflowers....


16 posted on 12/28/2010 3:42:31 PM PST by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I got so stressed and sick about things that happened lately that I ended up in the ER.


17 posted on 12/28/2010 3:45:11 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Daniels looks like a politician here, trying to win back social conservatives. Better to stand by comments and move on than do this. However, I cannot back him in the primary if he is not clearly on the side of appointing judges that support repeal of Roe v. Wade.


18 posted on 12/28/2010 3:49:45 PM PST by wastedpotential (McCain always said I was an agent of intolerance - but in 2008 those like me tolerated him most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

It tells me he is scrambling to find the “right” answer, which in turn, tells me he is running for POTUS.


19 posted on 12/28/2010 3:55:43 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I think it’s odd how people are willing to assess a candidate on what they say (however inartfully) versus what they actually have done.

Romney was a socially liberal governor. He now says he’s conservative - do we trust what he says or what his record indicates?

Huckabee was a fiscally liberal governor. He now says he’s conservative - do we trust what he says or what his record indicates?

If you answered “record” to those two, I’m not so sure Mitch’s highly awkward statements should really unwind his record as a fairly conservative governor (he’s not perfect, and his position on smoking is puzzling). But frankly, he may have the most effective, conservative gubernatorial record of all of the serious candidates that were governors. I think what he’s really saying is that he wants to focus on financial matters instead of running on wedge issues...but I will be keeping an eye on this.

Rush, Sarah, Mitch...our guys and girls don’t rely on the teleprompter so they’ll come off awkward sometimes. I think Sarah knows that SOUTH Korea are our allies, and I think Mitch isn’t suddenly going to become Giuliani 2.0 because of his goofy truce statements.


20 posted on 12/28/2010 4:00:58 PM PST by order66.exe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: order66.exe

“Truce” is an inflammatory word, no matter how much Mitch tries to walk it back. There really is a culture war. The liberals have unceasingly bombarded our culture for many years. And yet WE are the ones offering a truce?


21 posted on 12/28/2010 4:33:31 PM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I wish he’d give it up. There aren’t that many stupid people who will vote for him in the Presidential primary.

He should hang out with Mitt, Newt, Huck and the rest....hey, maybe try that no-labels gig.


22 posted on 12/28/2010 8:15:02 PM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo

Mitch’s track record in Indiana has been to reduce spending and reduce government employment. He has been solidly pro-life and has always had the support of the pro-life community in Indiana. He was allegedly prompted out of the Bush administration because they felt the budget cuts he wanted to make were draconian. I can’t stand Lugar but Daniels also worked for Reagan and I’m not going to fault a guy for what he did in an entry-level job in the political world. These forum comments strike me as awfully knee-jerk because they aren’t based on what the man has actually done. Rather, they sound to me as so much leaping to conclusions while Daniels tries to find his footing on a national stage. I’d rather have Daniels than Hucksterbee or Romney, by far.


23 posted on 02/12/2011 2:55:46 PM PST by CatholicEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

He isn’t tied to Lugar and he has always been pro life. He is a health nut and tends to nannyism. I don’t think he must be too tough on immigration either. But then, none of them are but Steve King or Bachmann.


24 posted on 02/12/2011 3:01:48 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CatholicEagle

So are you part of the “My Man Mitch” political machine?

The key words are “trying to find his footing on the national stage”. That’s code for, he’s going to go all over the place until he finds a position that sells, kinda like Mitt.

The guy is marked by his own words and deeds. He did cave to the State Dems and spent most of Indiana’s surplus.

I’m more comfortable with someone who has solid conservative positions and articulates them well on the national stage.

No more RINOs .......ever!!


25 posted on 02/12/2011 4:18:35 PM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo

Not part of the Mitch machine, haven’t worked for a candidate for any office higher than sheriff since Pat Buchanan.

I don’t do “code.” My point is that Mitch is a neophyte a lot like Sarah Palin and no question Sarah has had to learn how to speak differently to keep from having her words twisted. Now the press doesn’t twist her words anymore because Sarah has become more speech-savvy—they just attack directly. I think Daniels is going up the same learning curve. Frankly, it stinks that it works that way but the MSM is statist to its core and that’s what we get in 2011 America.

I’m mostly bothered by the kneejerk reactions of people who have no idea as to his track record, good or bad.

Having said that, I wasn’t nec. responding just to you. I’m a long time lurker on Free Republic and still learning how to post.


26 posted on 02/13/2011 8:21:31 AM PST by CatholicEagle (There are more airplanes on the bottom of the ocean than submarines in the sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson