The witch hunt for this judge has begun. They researched his biography and knew how to attack if he ruled against The Regime. This is a warning shot to all other judges who may have the opportunity to rule on this case.
Yet again our corrupt biased media does the dirty work for this admin and their messiah.
posted on 02/01/2011 8:27:27 AM PST
(Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
The good judge was a Naval Aviator, USNA Class of 1962.
look at all the dirt some Soros-Sutoro team opposition research operative dug up on this judge
and about all they can accuse him of is liking camellias
posted on 02/01/2011 8:28:15 AM PST
(All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
Did I miss something in this story? He paid cash for his wife giving birth? That’s “His own Med Story”? Really?
posted on 02/01/2011 8:31:05 AM PST
Personalize. Freeze. Demonize.
Shout out to the State Run Media: No, not EVERYONE who rules against Communism is a bad guy.
posted on 02/01/2011 8:33:12 AM PST
(If Illegal Aliens are Undocumented Workers, then Thieves are Undocumented Shoppers.)
I’m basking in the Era of Civility.
I wouldn’t even chalk this up to media ‘bias’ or even mendacity, but to reporter stupidity. The implication is that the reader is equally stupid. Unfortunately, in too many cases, that’s true.
Do the reporters really think a judge is going to rule on a constitutional issue because s/he has his/her own medical story? What person over 30 doesn’t have their own medical story? Sorry, sorry coverage.
posted on 02/01/2011 8:38:38 AM PST
Defenders of the law said that analogy was flawed. Insurance can't work if people are allowed to opt out until they need medical attention. Premiums collected from many who are healthy pay the cost of care for those who get sick. Since the uninsured can get treated in the emergency room, deciding not to get coverage has consequences for other people who act prudently do buy coverage.
Are they kidding? There's some serious schizophrenia going on here. How can they make this argument and at the same time insist that insurance must cover pre-existing illnesses?
Do you guys ever read the stories that you post? It’s not a hit piece. Very favorable to him.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson