Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The witch hunt for this judge has begun. They researched his biography and knew how to attack if he ruled against The Regime. This is a warning shot to all other judges who may have the opportunity to rule on this case.
1 posted on 02/01/2011 8:26:08 AM PST by TexasNative2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TexasNative2000

Yet again our corrupt biased media does the dirty work for this admin and their messiah.


2 posted on 02/01/2011 8:27:27 AM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000

The good judge was a Naval Aviator, USNA Class of 1962.

GO NAVY!


3 posted on 02/01/2011 8:27:33 AM PST by paterfamilias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000
look at all the dirt some Soros-Sutoro team opposition research operative dug up on this judge

and about all they can accuse him of is liking camellias

4 posted on 02/01/2011 8:28:15 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000

Did I miss something in this story? He paid cash for his wife giving birth? That’s “His own Med Story”? Really?


6 posted on 02/01/2011 8:31:05 AM PST by Grumpybutt (Gender Traditionalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000
Classic Alinsky.

Personalize. Freeze. Demonize.

Shout out to the State Run Media: No, not EVERYONE who rules against Communism is a bad guy.

7 posted on 02/01/2011 8:33:12 AM PST by Lazamataz (If Illegal Aliens are Undocumented Workers, then Thieves are Undocumented Shoppers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000

I’m basking in the Era of Civility.


8 posted on 02/01/2011 8:34:13 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000

I wouldn’t even chalk this up to media ‘bias’ or even mendacity, but to reporter stupidity. The implication is that the reader is equally stupid. Unfortunately, in too many cases, that’s true.

Do the reporters really think a judge is going to rule on a constitutional issue because s/he has his/her own medical story? What person over 30 doesn’t have their own medical story? Sorry, sorry coverage.


14 posted on 02/01/2011 8:38:38 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000
Defenders of the law said that analogy was flawed. Insurance can't work if people are allowed to opt out until they need medical attention. Premiums collected from many who are healthy pay the cost of care for those who get sick. Since the uninsured can get treated in the emergency room, deciding not to get coverage has consequences for other people who act prudently do buy coverage.

Are they kidding? There's some serious schizophrenia going on here. How can they make this argument and at the same time insist that insurance must cover pre-existing illnesses?

16 posted on 02/01/2011 8:40:06 AM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000

Do you guys ever read the stories that you post? It’s not a hit piece. Very favorable to him.


18 posted on 02/01/2011 8:44:14 AM PST by republicangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson