Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Computer ties human as they square off on 'Jeopardy!'
CNN Tech ^ | February 15, 2011 | John D. Sutter

Posted on 02/15/2011 7:52:19 PM PST by Kaslin

(CNN) -- The computers haven't proven to be our trivia overlords just yet.

Give them at least until Wednesday.

An IBM supercomputer named Watson finished one round of the TV show "Jeopardy!" on Monday night tied with one of his human competitors and $3,000 ahead of the other.

The man vs. computer face-off won't be complete, however, until the final rounds of the extended trivia game show are aired on Tuesday and Wednesday.

IBM trumpets Watson, which has been in development for years and has the processing power of 2,800 "powerful computers," as a major advancement in machines' efforts to understand human language. The computer receives clues through digital texts and then buzzes in against the two other "Jeopardy!" contestants like any other player would. It juggles dozens of lines of reasoning at once and tries to arrive at a smart answer

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Prokopton
Does it have the rudimentary capability of understanding the spoken question or is the question inputted separately?

They said the question gets sent to Watson as a text file at the same time it is revealed to the human players and read.

Watson does not hear nor parse the question - nor the answers of the other players. That happened last night. Watson buzzed in second. The human player gave the wrong answer. That answer was also Watson's, and it merely repeated the same wrong answer not having any way of getting the information that xyz was wrong. A human would've thought "Hmm, better go with my second guess..."

21 posted on 02/15/2011 8:41:49 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ask Watson if Islam is a religion of peace.

That will fry his circuit board.


22 posted on 02/15/2011 8:43:23 PM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csense
Does Watson activate the button mechanically, like his human counterparts?

My understanding is that Watson mechanically operates a plunger-type of control, just like a human. The difference is that Watson receives a text file at the instant that the other contestants start to hear the question. Watson's comprehension of the question is undoubtedly much faster, so Watson is apt to "buzz in" first.

I knew the answer to all but three of the questions tonight. I suspect that Ken Jennings and the other fellow knew just about every question too. But Watson reacts faster than they can, so Watson controls the board.

23 posted on 02/15/2011 8:46:55 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (BO + MB = BOMB -- The One will make sure they get one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"Hey Watson, your mother's a whore."

24 posted on 02/15/2011 8:49:57 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida
Ask Watson if Islam is a religion of peace.

Answer: Yes. Oh, and by the way "peace" means, in this context, that the last infidel has been killed or converted. They simply seek peace. That isn't too much to ask, is it?

25 posted on 02/15/2011 8:50:47 PM PST by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Grumplestiltskin
My wife and son were saying how “unfair” it was. Perhaps. But the background information, and the earlier trials from a few years ago shows just how difficult a feat the computer is performing. Pretty amazing.

I was surprised at how uneven it was. It was not very “entertaining”. One would think they would have tried it a few times and seen how uneven it was. And then perhaps add in a delay to the computer of a tenth of a second or whatever to make it comparable to a human’s response of thought and then action to push the button.

Of course then you wouldn't be showing the full capability of the machine.

26 posted on 02/15/2011 8:57:35 PM PST by 21twelve ( You can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust ... another lost generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Buckhead
I want to know if Watson has an advantage "ringing in." I work with a guy who was on Jeopardy, who finished second, and said that hitting the button was 50% of the game.

Off topic, thanks for your service to our republic in 2004. My son has learned from you. God bless you.

27 posted on 02/15/2011 9:18:49 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
It is a quibble whether it reads the question or hears it from Trebek.

Not a quibble at all. Even a small child could easily understand the spoken question. If the computer cannot, it is obviously limited in its abilities even when compared to a child.

28 posted on 02/15/2011 9:21:00 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

the humans have to wait until the exact moment when trebek finishes, and the computer can buzz in early?


29 posted on 02/15/2011 9:29:04 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hecht

It is who is first on the button. I knew most of the answers so you know the guys did - Watson just rang in faster. Needs to be some kind of built in delay on Watson’s ringing in ability.

Also, the final question category was “U.S Cities” and Watson’s answer was Toronto with several question marks after it - what’s with that? I would think Toronto should have been eliminated from Watson’s possibilities by virtue of the category alone.


30 posted on 02/15/2011 9:29:29 PM PST by Let's Roll (Save the world's best healthcare - REPEAL, DEFUND Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

on jeopardy, can the contestants read the question like we can at home, or do they have to listen to trebek?

Listening is different than reading and might activate different parts of the human brain?

If the humans have to listen to Trebek, so should the computer. there are speak to text programs.


31 posted on 02/15/2011 9:33:58 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

>>Not a quibble at all. Even a small child could easily understand the spoken question. If the computer cannot, it is obviously limited in its abilities even when compared to a child.<<

You are conflating the ability to “hear” versus the ability to “read.”

All Jeopardy contestants get to read (via sight) the answers before they ring in. It is thus a quibble whether Watson reads the clue by text input as opposed to hearing Trebek speak it — Watson is on an even footing with the human contestants.


32 posted on 02/15/2011 9:37:19 PM PST by freedumb2003 (The TOTUS-reader is a Judas Goat, leading the American sheeple to the slaugherhouse /Parmy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hecht

“there were several easy questions that the humans knew and I could see them trying to push the button but Watson answered first. I suppose watson answers at the speed of light while humans have to push a button that is far slower and puts them at a disadvantage.”

If they explained how that works, I missed it. Maybe it was rigged so that once the computer reaches its threshold for answering (50% certainty, whatever that means), it has to wait the average time it takes a human brain to order its thumb to click in.


33 posted on 02/15/2011 9:38:45 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How does a computer decide how much to wager in final jeopardy? I suppose it doesn’t matter if it has doubled the other players’ scores. But what if it wasn’t? How would a computer judge its knowledge of “U.S. Cities” if, presumably, if it knows everything it knows with equanimity? I mean, it can’t say to itself, “Well, I took that calculus course sophomore year, but I didn’t study very hard, so I better not swing for the fences.”


34 posted on 02/15/2011 9:44:33 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
“there were several easy questions that the humans knew and I could see them trying to push the button but Watson answered first. I suppose watson answers at the speed of light while humans have to push a button that is far slower and puts them at a disadvantage.”

I watched it and I agree. Watson was faster on the button. But so was Ken Jennings when he had his big run too against other people.

But I was very impressed with the programming of that machine. It could make complex associations and do it very well.

What amazed me was how Watson was so totally wrong of the Final question. I would have thought that would have been an easy one, but then again, Watson never had the 'pleasure' of flying through Chicago. He only travels via cyber space. ;~))

35 posted on 02/15/2011 9:49:11 PM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Time to crank up, “I Lost On Jeopardy” by Weird Al! :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvUZijEuNDQ


36 posted on 02/15/2011 9:49:50 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grumplestiltskin

“This is ‘John Henry’ all over again — only this time, the steam drill is winnin’!”

I suppose John Henry technically won, but at the end he was dead. The machine didn’t die, did it?


37 posted on 02/15/2011 9:49:57 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

“But so was Ken Jennings when he had his big run too against other people”

I always figured Jennings’ secret was that he clicked in before he knew the answer. But that was his risk, and anyone could have taken it.


38 posted on 02/15/2011 9:53:08 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

“It is a quibble whether it reads the question or hears it from Trebek.”

Understanding spoken speech requires far more processing. There can be difficulties in a machine understanding regional dialects, slang, and subtle differences in similar sounding words. For example, disambiguating heir, air, and err requires additional processing to determine which word best fits the context of the sentence.


39 posted on 02/15/2011 9:58:51 PM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So what’s the deal - does Watson have an internet connection and basically googles the answer in an intelligent way or does he have these facts programmed into him somehow? If it’s all internal, then that’s pretty impressive, because he would have to have an incredibly broad database of raw factual info do draw on.


40 posted on 02/15/2011 9:58:55 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson