Posted on 02/19/2011 4:01:41 PM PST by AndyTheBear
No, no, it's Ludacris who wants to date dinosaurs. You'd think he could do better but there it is.
Only if you believe the mass extinction was the fault of the Jews.
BTW, all alcoholic beverages sold in the U.S. must be radioactive, thus proving it was made with recently harvested live grains.
Because 12 tests can be written off as anomalies...but if they keep finding radiocarbon in dinosaur bones it just gets harder and harder to marginalize those who dare question that they are millions of years old.
Real science is based on dogma, NOT repeated experiments! Stop the testing now!</satire>
Yes that is why the experiments must be stopped. Because the radiocarbons found don't exist.
But if these evil experiments continue to find these untrue results then it will only get harder and harder to write the creationists off as whack jobs....so lets go ahead and ban the experiments!
And perhaps burn some books?
Yes, different methods are used because dinosaur bones are presumed to be millions of years old. Now that they appear to be much younger, shall the experiments be repeated to make sure they are not in error? Of course not. Thus, as I said such evil tests should be outlawed...along with Galileo's evil telescope thingy.
Look, if one properly looks for radiocarbons in dino bones, one will not find them right? Is this true or not? Do you care about testing things to see what is true or not?
Exactly, and the fact that they find Carbon-14 in the bones every time somebody does this evil practice is like torturing puppies. Pure evil! I think they have invisible pink unicorns putting it there! Whats your theory?
Until I find out the answer from the Source, I lean toward the 10k end, but I’m willing to read other views. Less is possible, more is possible. With God anything is possible, and a literal week for creating a solar system is as nothing to Him.
Indeed, tests that might falsify a popular scientific view and embarrass arrogant academics should be viewed with more scorn than I already have!
I will join you...and say people who dare look for C14 where it can't possibly exist (dino bones) are puppy torturing, wife beaters, with delusions of godhood!!! And they have stinky diaper pants!!!
Good call! Keep up the well reasoned arguments. But for the love of Darwin...STOP THE EXPERIMENTS!!!!
Therefore, you would not expect any in the bones! So the devil put it there? Or was it imps? Ninjas? What's your explanation?
The age of the sedimentary brackets have to be established somehow. However, certainly there can be no C14 in dino bones...there is just no way...but there is! So stop the experiments, or some people have to rethink too many things!
STOP THE EXPERIMENTS NOW!!!! NO C14 TESTING IN DINO BONES!
Oh the horror if we have to rethink the age of the "sedimentation" layers.
?
Totally meaningless, especially without a benchmark sample from the dinosaurs' home planet.
Apples and orangutans.
Has this been verified? My understanding is that the ratio of radiocarbons to regular carbon is kinda low. I mean I don't think of myself as radioactive because of my own C14, but I must suppose I have some. Also, are we sure crude oil was all once living matter? Some scientists disagree, albeit they are in the minority.
Except there was some! Dang! Well shall we assume contamination every time the experiment was done? Or shall we try again and make sure one way or the other.
Which side wants to try? Which side wants to hide?
I am pretty conservative, my call to ban the tests is satirical.
They DO NOT use carbon 14 for dating dinosaur bones. The use uranium.
Um, these so-called creation scientists actually did check for C14 in dino bones. It was an evil thing to be sure. And by a cruel trick of magical imps, they seemed to have found what could not possibly be in a bone that has been dead for millions of years.
We don't know for sure the dates of the layers of sedimentation, albeit many people have worked hard studying and theorizing about them. We don't know for sure the original concentration of uranium at any given time or location except as we can correlate it with the sedimentation and such. But we DO know for sure that after 100,000 years ALL C14 will be gone...thus we can conclude that if there is ANY C14 in dino bones the uranium dates and sedimentation dates that were used to calibrate them are drastically wrong, and much rethinking and re-theorizing is in order. For C14 no calibration is needed. No matter how much or how little C14 the dinos had in them, it should all be long gone. So any C14...is crazy! It would turn modern thinking on its head. And that is exactly what 12 of 12 tests have shown. Is this not provocative? Or is it just scary?
In science, you are supposed to get a theory and then put it to the test...but all too often, people who grow attached to theories prefer to simply promote them rather than test them. To look for ways it all fits together, instead of using tests that subject it to the possibility of all falling apart.
Thus, there is much incentive to marginalize these crazy readings. They are very provocative. They would turn far too much established theory on its head.
So the question is...does main stream science have the balls to run tests for C14 on dino bones? Or is it going to turn away from risking falsification? Modern science says none will be there. But so far they have been wrong. Shall they see for sure? Should the hide their head in the sand? What should they do?
I blame sloppy bokkeeping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.