Posted on 03/01/2011 10:30:01 AM PST by Kaslin
The great Russian social philosopher Pitirim Sorokin argued that when societies reach a sensate stage of historical evolution, it is inevitable that ideational impulses will percolate to the center of culture. This cyclical interpretation of history is driven by forces in the stream of history, a kind of quasi Marxian belief in historical inevitability. While religious zeal often does emerge when sensual pleasures cannot satisfy the soul’s longing for transcendence, the questions that emerge are: what is the catalyst for change and how are ideational beliefs channeled into socially empowering ideas.
As I see it the catalyst for social transformation is found in the culture, yes even the debauched popular culture. The consumption of popular culture represents a powerful medium for change if the message is transferred from the degrading sensate presentations to the uplifting ideational. A lapse into the personal, into cultural narcissism, is a function of disbelief in the transcendent. If there isn’t a God, anything is possible noted Dostoyevsky, including the belief that people can be gods. The restraints that God imposed on human behavior have been lifted by the belief we can recreate the world in man’s image. An existential light suggests there is no wrong except for the limitations we impose on ourselves. Taboos are the social conventions that arbitrarily restrain us from the lure of sensate pleasure.
From these assumptions the institutions that once mediated between the individual and the state have been rendered weak and battered. The family is in disarray and even terms like mother and father have been put through the cauldron of political correctness with terms as parent one and parent two the substitutions. Schools no longer teach social conventions when what counts is expression, the noise of recognition. Churches are less religious centers and more social organizations there to promote the latest fad emerging from the Zeitgeist. The Tocquevillian view that these mediating structures give America unique qualities seems anachronistic against the backdrop of present reality.
How then can the wave of sensualism be reversed? As I see it there is the distinct possibility for a Wilburforcian revolution, a moral turning based on the literal capture of popular culture (Wiburforce and his colleagues did transform British social norms in the 19th century, including the abolition of slavery). Suppose, for the sake of argument, films for television and movie consumption subtly adopted the stance of honor, courage, sacrifice, civic virtue. Suppose our heroes were not those who flouted the law, but those who defended freedom. Suppose the dark and sinister lyrics of misogynistic rap music were replaced by romance and courtship. Is it possible that a degraded culture which has had a profound effect on shaping public attitudes can be transmogrified into the vehicle for capturing the culture and serving as the vanguard of an ideational era?
For the United States to survive as a democratic republic we must examine the endogenous threats, not merely the exogenous challenges. In fact, our inability to withstand external threats is due in large part to our unwillingness to consider the cultural decay around us. It certainly isn’t easy to envision the transformation I believe is necessary, especially when the models for youthful emulation sell debauchery and sensual pleasure at any price (Pace: the tv program “Skins”). But there are Wilburforcians in our midst who understand the historical stakes and are willing to tease out of the American past the romance and excitement that led directly to the establishment of this exceptional nation.
If there is a cycle to history, catching this ideational wave will not only promote a desirable social outcome, it may even have commercial possibilities. It isn’t coincidental that PG rated films invariably do better at the box office than R rated films. America is poised for change if only the channels of popular culture can be opened to consider that which is uplifting. One can never be entirely sure of what the future holds, but reclaiming liberty, defending the republic and appreciating the noteworthy in our history are goals worth realizing through the influence of cultural expression.
I learned a new word today… “ideational”
Where are the young movie makers and artists, poets, writers willing to take the arrows to produce good arts?
Which is to be mitigated employing feed-forward periodicity: The Biblical system of Sabbaths and appointed times.
50s to early 60s?
It is “Wilberforce” not “Wilburforce”.
With my tongue firmly in cheek, I argue that not everything is about "u."
Equally troublesome is that your screen-name is spelled "Ranald" which some would say is a lifetime dis-qualifier for spelling Nazi appointment but then again, you have probably been asking for spelling in a broad manner for much of the time you have used Ranald.
What I think is useful in the article is the overwhelming usage of complex terms with no clarity added by their usage.
His name was indeed Ranald.
I have no doubt — it was just the irony overload and the pun that popped into my head. LOL.
I’m not holding my breath but it’s an interesting idea anyway.
Now I'm wondering if he got Sorokin right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.