Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Ronald Reagan Moved After Detecting Radioactive Plume (Took 1 Months Radiation in 1 Hour)
ABC News ^ | March 14, 2011 | LUIS MARTINEZ

Posted on 03/14/2011 2:11:19 AM PDT by buccaneer81

USS Ronald Reagan Moved After Detecting Radioactive Plume Off Japan Ship's Crew Was Exposed to Low Level of Radiation

By LUIS MARTINEZ March 14, 2011

The aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan and other US Navy ships in the waters off the quake zone in eastern Japan were repositioned after the detection of a low-level radiation plume from the troubled Fukushima nuclear plant located 100 miles away.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan
KEYWORDS: japanearthquake; navair; nukeplants; radiation; shipmovement; usnavy; ussronaldreagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: allmost

I read this article @ stars & stripes


21 posted on 03/14/2011 3:49:48 AM PDT by Lil Flower (American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cavador
"Do they have dosiometers on the ship?I know that they have wearable ones for the engine crew ,but is there one on the bridge as well?"

I would expect that they have rad detection capability in any air-handling equipment, which is probably what alarmed. Once that happened, the health physicist types undoubtedly put film badges on "non-reactor" personnel.

22 posted on 03/14/2011 3:59:00 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
This part was useful as well- "To put this into perspective, the maximum radiation dose received was equal to the amount of natural background radiation one would receive in one month from sources such as rocks, soil and the sun."
23 posted on 03/14/2011 4:00:37 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

24 posted on 03/14/2011 4:02:56 AM PDT by magslinger (What Would Stephen Decatur Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

No, it isn’t double talk. It is just logical to move the ship out of the direct path of the wind. It doesn’t mean they are scared or worried or anyone is in danger, which they are not. Just something for the media to go into a frenzy on to fill the 24 hour news cycle and try to increase ratings.


25 posted on 03/14/2011 4:08:34 AM PDT by Galactica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg

You would think the design would be along the lines of using power to keep the rods together to produce heat and once outage occures the rods would reseparate away from critical mass... much like when air goes out on a truck the breaks lock up.

The final containment pot of molten uranium, as you mention, is the ultimate “if all else fail” and would work, but I am surprized that it takes power to contain the problem. We should not have to send a guy down there to pull rods out.


26 posted on 03/14/2011 4:14:25 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrates Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“To put this into perspective, the maximum radiation dose received was equal to the amount of natural background radiation one would receive in one month from sources such as rocks, soil and the sun.”

I would assume the people closer to the plant (not 100 miles away)were getting a dosage like that 24 hours per day every day. Nothing to worry about?


27 posted on 03/14/2011 4:19:00 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Bingo.


28 posted on 03/14/2011 4:19:28 AM PDT by khnyny (What exactly is a CDO??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
"...Now it is true that one of the reactors was damaged. slightly damaged. But there is no danger of a meltdown..."


29 posted on 03/14/2011 4:20:25 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

30 posted on 03/14/2011 4:26:45 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
So thats why he repositioned the ship away from the plant,,,because there was nothing to worry about. Double-talk.

I don't think that's what the Reagan's CO was saying at all. They detected elevated (but still minimal) radiation. They executed the standard precautions (making the contaminated crew take decom showers) and moved the ship in case there was more radiation headed there way.

The Reagan has about 6000 crewmembers, so 17 represents .3% (or .003) of her crew. The ship is designed to operate in an irradiated environment, with complex radiation detection equipment, washdown equipment for both personnel and the ship itself (washdown sprayers actually built into the hull/flightdeck of the ship) and overpressure capability (keep the pressure inside the ship higher than the outside, so contaminants can't get in.

If there was a need for the ship to stay where she was, the CO would have been able to. But if there wasn't, he took the right action in not only mitigating any potential risk (emphasis on "any") but also the likelihood of bad PR.
31 posted on 03/14/2011 4:28:40 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

“one month from sources such as rocks, soil and the sun”

I dunno, this just doesn’t seem to be that significant.


32 posted on 03/14/2011 4:30:18 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
That's a chilling thought. Some of those people have possibly received several years worth of radiation already.
33 posted on 03/14/2011 4:31:25 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

If the “radiation” was removed with soap and water then it was not radiation but contamination. Somewhat the same thing but not entirely. Think an pile of dog crap. Contamination is the pile, radiation is the smell.


34 posted on 03/14/2011 4:34:15 AM PDT by Sursam Abordine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I dunno, this just doesn’t seem to be that significant.

Per hour? Sounds pretty significant to me. Sit in it for a week and pick up six years worth of exposure.

35 posted on 03/14/2011 4:36:02 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

To those frothed by imagination into a near-panic state it seems HORRIBLE and TERRIFYING. They, sad to say MANY FReepers included, have become very destabilized in reasoning.

It’s a tell tale as to our cultures general gullibleness to emotionally-driven response. Wanna know how an Obama got elected?

Here is the dynamic of irrationality in action.


36 posted on 03/14/2011 4:38:46 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sursam Abordine
Point is, can someone please educate PAOs and so-called news reporters to at least attempt some sort of accuracy in reporting. In the end, the hysteria caused by irresponsible reporting surrounding this issue may be worse than reality.

Remember 3-mile Island. Carter and his gang of roving idiots allowed that serious problem to become fodder for late night jokes and official policy for the last 30 years.

Don't think Obama and company will NOT use this to shutdown future nuclear plants in this country and possibly go after the ones we have.

37 posted on 03/14/2011 4:39:10 AM PDT by Sursam Abordine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Those 17 were aircrew returning from shore. They and their helos were washed down. They were contaminated with particulate matter. But the ship also went through a zone of radioactivity.


38 posted on 03/14/2011 4:39:41 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bvw
To those frothed by imagination into a near-panic state it seems HORRIBLE and TERRIFYING. They, sad to say MANY FReepers included, have become very destabilized in reasoning.

I see none of that on this thread. I see questions, skepticism and speculation, not "near-panic."

39 posted on 03/14/2011 4:44:01 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I’m with you. Part of emergency planning for this type of situation is knowing which way the plume will be or is going. First thing to do is get out of the way, not sail directly into it’s path.


40 posted on 03/14/2011 4:44:44 AM PDT by Sursam Abordine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson