Skip to comments.Dianne Feinstein in electoral trouble? So says the latest Harris Poll.
Posted on 03/24/2011 11:59:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
A new poll from California shows Dianne Feinstein falling below 50% in re-elect support, a rating than in any other state might mean something. McClatchy sends up the red flag from the latest Harris Poll, which gives the four-term Senator only a +4 on support for a fifth term, hitting below 50%:
Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein remains more popular among California voters than her colleague Barbara Boxer, a new Field Poll shows.
But Feinstein can’t rest easy as she prepares for another re-election bid next year. For the first time since her initial 1992 election, less than half of the Californians surveyed consider themselves leaning toward Feinstein.
“It’s somewhat surprising, because she’s considered by many to be among the most popular politicians in California,” Field Poll director Mark DiCamillo said Wednesday.
Forty-six percent of Californians surveyed between Feb. 28 and March 14 said they are “inclined” to vote for Feinstein next year. Forty-two percent are “not inclined,” and 12 percent call themselves undecided.
My friend Eric Ostermeier at Smart Politics takes a hard look at the data, and says Feinstein should be worried:
For starters, the senior Senator from California’s job approval rating has been languishing in the 40s for well over a year and has been on the decline for half a decade.
SurveyUSA’s most recent poll from February of this year found Senator Feinstein with only a 43 percent approval rating – down by more than a quarter from the 59 percent rating she received in November 2006 when she was elected to her fourth term.
That means Feinstein has suffered through a 29-point net drop in job approval from her reelection in November 2006 (+25 points; 59 percent approve, 34 percent disapprove) to February 2011 (-4 points; 43 percent approve, 47 percent disapprove).
And the February poll is not an aberration.
On job approval, Feinstein is actually under water at 43/47.5 in Survey USA polling this year (averaging two iterations). That’s about the same as last year’s 43.5/47.8 over 12 polls, when Barbara Boxer withstood a tough election against Carly Fiorina. Eric does even more number-crunching and discovers that only 23 of the 140 Senators to have won four or more terms in office failed to win 60% of the vote in at least one of those first four elections, and Feinstein has only gotten as high as 59.4% — in her last election, in the Democratic wave of 2006.
National Journal’s Hotline throws a dash of cold water on the Feinstein-is-vulnerable analysis:
46 percent of California voters surveyed said they would be inclined to vote for Feinstein in 2012, while 42 percent said they would not be inclined to do so. During the year before her previous reelection campaigns, Feinstein’s reelect percentage has consistently been over 50 percent in the Field Poll: 53 percent of registered voters were inclined to reelect her in a poll released in March of 2005, while that figure was 59 percent in March of 1999. In a June 1993 poll, the figure was 58 percent.
Still, there are encouraging signs for Feinstein.
48 percent of California voters approve of the job Feinstein is doing, while just 33 percent disapprove, according to the survey. That figure is higher than Sen. Barbara Boxer‘s (D-Calif.) October 2009 44 percent approval rating.
It’s encouraging news for Feinstein; Boxer, despite attracting a well-known and well-financed GOP opponent in Carly Fiorina, still won by ten percent. The 2012 presidential election should also boost Feinstein’s chances in the heavily Democratic state of California.
The sample for the Harris poll was also rather small for a state the size of California, only 444 registered voters. Harris and Field are considered the leading pollsters in the state, but given the wide geographical distances and disparities in the Golden State’s electorate, that seems too small to be a reliable predictor for an election eighteen months away.
Also, one would have to presume that California would vote for a Republican for statewide office to believe that Feinstein is really vulnerable. The GOP didn’t win one such office in 2010 despite the Republican sweep across the rest of the nation and the disastrous economy in their own state. They re-elected Boxer, for Pete’s sake, and stuck a 72-year-old retread in the Governor’s office 28 years after serving his first two terms in that office — by fourteen points. In 2012, with Barack Obama at the top of the ticket, Feinstein will be one of the few — perhaps the only — Senator who will benefit from his presence.
The GOP will robustly contend for Feinstein’s seat, but don’t expect any miracles. About the best that could happen would be to force Democrats to spend a lot of money defending her, and keep them from spending it elsewhere.
Whomever the Republican candidate is, the unions will find some illegal who once waited on the candidate to claim (s)he left a poor tip or something, and the media will gin it up into a major scandal.
Well, the entire state gets to vote for her (or not vote for her). It's not like she's the mayor of L.A. In that case, you'd have a point.
Boxer had high dissaproval and still won, easily last time around.
California is gone. The parasites outnumber the hosts. The Democrats have won.
I feel sorry for the Californians who are conservative/moderate. When they say left coast that is true. The whole costal area is liberal - not so much certain areas of the state. In Louisiana we have been trying to get Mary Landrieu out for two terms now both times unsuccessfully. One of her large bases is New Orleans and we had hoped that Katrina dispursed that base. But she also has a base in Cajun country. She has slipped by twice (I’m sure with underhanded help). 2014 coming and we are eager to try again - hopefully this time we can rid ourselves of the LAST Democrat to represent us in Washington, D.C.
Is someone attempting ot suggest that California is going to elect anything other than an idiot statist leftist?
Don’t waste your time, don’t make me laugh, just knock it off.
I was sure that Senator M’aam would finally eat dirt only to be disappointed. Carly was not a bad candidate. Boxer is awful and Feinstein is only marginally saner. Sad comment on California.
Do you mean a California (CA) Democrate (D), better known as a CAD?
So was Boxer. Then the Union Filth started terrorizing voters and stuffing the ballot boxes. And, Presto! She won!
Don’t worry the Republicans in their infinite wisdom will find a socialist to run against the socialist forcing conservatives to stay home.
It’s California and she’s a lib democrat. As the incumbent, there’s no way she loses out there. Boxer was by comparison FAR more vulnerable, and she still won big.
Feinstein lose? No way.
Putting RNC money into statewide California elections is equivalent to burning it.
Yep. At the national level, write it off except for a few competitive U.S. House races, and call it a day. At the Senate and Presidential levels, CA is toast.
Oh, please.... there's no way she loses.
You are correct. I know many here in California that would never vote for a republican no matter what. I would say around 40% to 45% are like this.
For the most part they are incapable of thinking for themselves.
She is not going anywhere. Dems win automatically in Cali
I agree with all of your comments on 56. I was very, very disappointed. It seemed unfathomable to me that Ms. Boxer could possibly win - particularly against a well-spoken and accomplished opponent (yes, maybe she wasn't the best CEO in the world at HP -- but at least she did something)... and yet ... surprise, surprise...
It is in their DNA.
California is a lost cause as long as they believe that they can get bailed out by Uncle Sugar!
Now, don’t get excited. We all know the California GOP folds like a cheap suit.
Bull****. The peep of kolifornia had a chance to boot that commie Boxer last year:..and blew it. I remember e everyone saying “This is gonna be our year!” And it was a failure. For whatever her problems, Gloria would be a lot better than six years of that Boxer moron.
Just bait for a bunch of unemployed political advisers trying to reel in another RINO sugardaddy/mommy with more money and ego than brains.
California has quite a bit further to fall before politics in this state becomes competitive again.
I think California is gone. It seems to be occupied primarily by crazy libs, illegal aliens, public sector unions and people who are on the dole or want to be on it. I really thought that the race between Boxer and Fiorini would be closer. It is hard to believe that anybody except an abortionist would respect Boxer who is a total idiot in addition to being inhumane.
With California now having Open Primaries, Feinstein will be facing off against a more liberal democrat in the general election.
That’s pretty much my list of dumbest senators as well. The only difference would be I would replace Casey with Schumer. Casey is a complete ignoramus while Schumer is more evil than stupid.
And yet she still won...
Agree.. Only way a conservative wins is if a earthquake and Tsumani hit and take out both LA and SF.
Richard Blum has made a fortune off the government because of his wife's dirty dealings. Whether it's real estate commissions on inflated prices for unused railroad rights of way, mining, tungsten bullets, or gold, Feinswine's machinations have a curious way of benefiting Catellus Development, thus ending up in the pocket of her husband, often via the Chinese.
That's a good one! Got any more?
Who's going to be the sacrificial lamb? Are there any rumors of potential candidates?
Saw it off and let it float around the Horn to Argentina!
No question the Bay Area is overrepresented: Brown, Harris, Feinstein, Newsom and Lockyer. Boxer might officially reside in Rancho Mirage but she has more in common with Berkeley.
Controller John Chiang (D) is from Los Angeles as is the Dem. Assembly Speaker.
San Diego doesn't have anyone on the scene likely to move up. Mayor Sanders (R) is termed out in 2012. I don't see any of the congressional delegation, Issa, Bilbray or Hunter "Jr.", running against DiFi.
Good old Prop 14. We could have DiFi vs Mark Leno.
Write-Ins aren't allowed so there'd never been a situation like AK or CT had with incumbents pushed out and running as "independents."
That’s okay.... John and Ken will smack her around a little to bolster their street cred and then when a viable opponent arises they will annihilate them with their broccoli or heads on a stick crap... and she can slide into victory just like SENATOR Boxer and Jerry Brown. I wonder if Boxer and Brown ever properly thanked John and Ken?????