Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Teaches Wrong Words in Citizenship Booklet
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ^ | 2011 | U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Posted on 04/21/2011 7:45:47 AM PDT by bunkerhill7

This US Immigration Agency says this falsehood in their citizenship booklet:

``The Founding Fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution in 1787. The Constitution is the “supreme law of the land.” The U.S. Constitution has lasted longer than any other country’s constitution. It establishes the basic principles of the United States government. The Constitution establishes a system of government called “REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY.” In a representative representative democracy, citizens choose representatives to make the laws. U.S. citizens also choose a president to lead the executive branch of government. The Constitution lists fundamental rights for all citizens and other people living in the United States. Laws made in the United States must follow the Constitution.``

Nowhere does ``representative democracy`` appear in US. Constitution. The USA is a REPUBLIC.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; citizenship; constitution
PLEASE WRITE OR CALL YOUR CONGRESSMAN/WOMAN TO GET THIS FALSEHOOD CHANGED. ====

[MY CAPS]

I Pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

============

Article 4, Section 4 Republican Government

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a REPUBLICAN Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.``

Nowhere in the Constitution is the word `democracy` found.

----

ABRAHAM LINCOLN, speech, 1856

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the REPUBLIC is destroyed."

==================================

Abraham Lincoln LETTER: Mrs. Bixby Letter

Executive Mansion

Washington, D.C.

November 21, 1864

Dear Madam,

I have been shown in the files of the War Department a statement of the Adjutant-General of Massachusetts, that you are the mother of five sons who have died gloriously on the field of battle.

I feel how weak and fruitless must be any words of mine which should attempt to beguile you from the grief of a loss so overwhelming. But I cannot refrain from tendering to you the consolation that may be found in the thanks of the Republic they died to save.

====================

Horace Greeley's "The Prayer of the Twenty Millions" (August 19, 1862)

To ABRAHAM LINCOLN, President of the United States DEAR SIR: I do not intrude to tell you--for you must know already--that a great proportion of those who triumphed in you election, and of all who desire the unqualified suppression of the Rebellion now desolating our country, are sorely disappointed and deeply pained by the policy you seem to be pursuing with regard to the slaves of the Rebels. I write only to set succinctly and unmistakably before you what we require, what we think we have a right to expect, and of what we complain. I. We require of you, as the first servant of the REPUBLIC, charged especially and preeminently with this duty, that you EXECUTE THE LAWS.

===============

Frederick Douglas said 1859:

"Our fathers, when they framed this Government under which we live, understood this question [of popular sovereignty] just as well, and even better, than we do now. They knew when they made this REPUBLIC that a country so broad as ours, with such a variety of climate, soil, and productions, must have a variety of interests, requiring different laws adapted to each locality."

==============

Lincoln`s Speech to the One Hundred Sixty-Fourth Ohio Regiment Washington, D.C. August 18, 1864

``Soldiers -- You are about to return to your homes and your friends, after having, as I learn, performed in camp a comparatively short term of duty in this great contest. I am greatly obliged to you, and to all who have come forward at the call of their country. I wish it might be more generally and universally understood what the country is now engaged in. We have, as all will agree, a free Government, where every man has a right to be equal with every other man. In this great struggle, this form of Government and every form of human right is endangered if our enemies succeed. There is more involved in this contest than is realized by every one. There is involved in this struggle the question whether your children and my children shall enjoy the privileges we have enjoyed. I say this in order to impress upon you, if you are not already so impressed, that no small matter should divert us from our great purpose. There may be some irregularities in the practical application of our system. It is fair that each man shall pay taxes in exact proportion to the value of his property; but if we should wait before collecting a tax to adjust the taxes upon each man in exact proportion with every other man, we should never collect any tax at all. There may be mistakes made sometimes; things may be done wrong while the officers of the Government do all they can to prevent mistakes. But I beg of you, as citizens of this great REPUBLIC, not to let your minds to carried off from the great work we have before us.``

-------------------

Tedddy Roosevelt-

``This was the most famous university of mediaeval Europe at a time when no one dreamed that there was a New World to discover. Its services to the cause of human knowledge already stretched far back into the remote past at a time when my forefathers, three centuries ago, were among the sparse bands of traders, ploughmen, wood-choppers, and fisherfolk who, in hard struggle with the iron unfriendliness of the Indian-haunted land, were laying the foundations of what has now become the giant REPUBLIC of the West``

1 posted on 04/21/2011 7:45:51 AM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

ping


2 posted on 04/21/2011 7:49:14 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Prayers for missing Marizela Perez. Prayers for her safe return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
They pulled 'Representative Democracy' out of their keisters.

You would flunk Pol Sci I describing that as a government.

3 posted on 04/21/2011 7:51:20 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
U.S. citizens also choose a president to lead the executive branch of government.
The Electoral College is left out as well.
4 posted on 04/21/2011 7:54:07 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

The citizens also don’t choose the President. That’s the job of the electors.


5 posted on 04/21/2011 7:56:05 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Many people confuse type with form. They aren’t the same. Our type of government is Republic. Meaning that there is no monarch or other strong man. Our form of government is Representive Democracy which is clearly laid out in the constitution.


6 posted on 04/21/2011 8:04:16 AM PDT by webboy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

My first reaction is that this is willfull propagandizing on the part of the socialists and communists who infest every branch of the federal government from top to bottom.

But then I think that the bureaucrats who write garbage like this probably learned their mushy-headed version of history in government schools and have never actually read the constitution themselves.

Then I realize that both explanations are no doubt true.


7 posted on 04/21/2011 8:17:26 AM PDT by Iron Munro ("Our country's founders cherished liberty, not democracy." -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Is this a RECENT CHANGE IN WORDING?


8 posted on 04/21/2011 8:17:49 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

From Webster’s 1828 dictionary:

republic

REPUB’LIC, n. [L. respublica; res and publica; public affairs.]

1. A commonwealth; a state in which the exercise of the sovereign power is lodged in representatives elected by the people. In modern usage, it differs from a democracy or democratic state, in which the people exercise the powers of sovereignty in person. Yet the democracies of Greece are often called republics.


9 posted on 04/21/2011 8:27:08 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webboy45
Our form of government is Representive Democracy which is clearly laid out in the constitution.

Democracy in what sense? The word democracy was never used in the Constitution to my knoweledege. There is no universal right to vote. The states can restrict voting on a whole host of requirements and qualifications. Save those restricting discrimination in the Constitution. Race, Sex, etc.
10 posted on 04/21/2011 8:30:05 AM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of their Moonbats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

The US is a republic, and is also a representative democracy.

Has any one noted that republic and democracy are almost synonyms etymologically? Republic comes from Latin res publica, meaning of the people (or more literally, “the people’s thing”). Democracy come from Greek: rule by the demos (people).

Republic has genberally been taken to mean a government in which the chief executive is elected. The electors do not need to be representative of the whole population: see Rome or Venice as examples. This distinguishes a republic from a monarchy, where rule is (in theory) hereditary.

A representative democracy is designed to reflect the interests of the people, through elections choosing legislators.

Rather than getting too worked up over fine distinctions, I think that much more important to regard is the fundamental fallacy in all governments, which is that the people cannot be at all accurately represented in their infinite variety through occasion elections with very restricted choices (usually only two viable Presidential candidates, for example). The government makes so many rules that no one can know them all, and there is no conceivable way that the thousands of decisions made ievery year can represent the public. Therefore, the only approximation of the ideal of a popular government is to have the functions of the state as restricted as possible, and let the people make their own decisions, including their own life choices for their own sustenance and care, and provision for their own families. That is the only true ideal for popular government, and we are far from it.

Not only is restricted (or limited) government the ideal, but it is the most efficient in allowing and encouraging creative work, and in nurturing independent-minded and self-supporting adults. Even mental health is better in a society of people who have learned, and have been allowed to support themselves, care for their dependents, and make their own decisions.

The other way, of helpless dependency of the perpetual infant, leads to poverty and social strife, with frequent deadly conflict.


11 posted on 04/21/2011 8:31:02 AM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webboy45
Sorry- from first grade I am taught that the USA is a republic. Anybody who can read can determine that there are not the words in Section 4.

We do not need private interpretation of the Constitution. Even a fifth grader can see that these are not the same words.

Show me where do the words ``representative democracy`` occur in the Constitution!!!

``Article 4, Section 4 Republican Government ...a Republican Form of Government...``

US immigration Sercvice:= ``The Constitution establishes a system of government called “REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY`

The word ``republic`` is nowhere mentioned in the US Immigration booklet.

Thus they are not even using the words of the constitution to teach newly-to-be citizens. What the h is this crap?

To tell someone that a legal document has something in it but omits the words and verbally substitutes another word as true is fraud. Are you going to call this country a ``constitutional democracy`` as India does?? Or a democracy, but not a republic as Australia calls itself?? Give me a break!!

Now you want to redefine the US Constitution and the country? My family has been here since 1648 and we have always been taught by our teachers in school that we live in a republic.

If one does not want to uphold the Constitution, which, as one can read, is made up of WORDS!!- then find another constitution in another country but leave the U.S. Constitution alone!!

I will not dance to a new tune nor sing a new song.

12 posted on 04/21/2011 8:36:57 AM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

pg 14...a president must be a “native-born”? Where is that in the constitution?


13 posted on 04/21/2011 8:41:13 AM PDT by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

What’s a republic?


14 posted on 04/21/2011 8:42:46 AM PDT by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

The whole bickering between Republic and Democracy is in a word...well...stupid.

We are a Constitutionally Federated Democratic Republic. In shorthand, calling us a republic is no more or less accurate than calling us a democracy. Both are wholly inadequate to describe our form of government on their own, but they’re convenient.


15 posted on 04/21/2011 8:47:30 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Republic alone is meaningless. The USSR was a Republic in every sense of the word, but had a system of government far different than our own. There are at least a couple dozen forms of Republican government, with at least half a dozen still practiced. I could dispense with conformity altogether and start referring to the USA as a federation in shorthand, and be no less accurate than those who refer to us solely as a democracy or solely as a republic.


16 posted on 04/21/2011 8:57:48 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]



Tough Dog Says "Donate"


Click the Pic

17 posted on 04/21/2011 9:13:19 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Melas
We are still a representative republic, but less of one because of the 17th amendment which took the right of selecting Senators away from the state legislators and placed it directly with the people. It was a very bad move & needs to be repealed. Now the left is working on abolishing the electoral college. If that is ever accomplished, then we will be a true democracy run by mob rule. So in a very small way, you are correct. Since 1913, our representative republic began disbanding. I say began because there are states that still have representation in the federal government via US Senators because they have laws allowing them to recall those Senators. No where in a democracy will you find this kind of representation. Words have meaning and to try and change a form of government by misconstruing words is usurping the US Constitution & our laws. The only democracy about our form of government created by the founders was in the simple majority of the public at large needed in each state to elect their US Congressmen to the US House of Reps. Or to put it as “Boner” said, only 1/2 of 1/3 of branches the federal government is elected by a simple popular democracy vote.
18 posted on 04/21/2011 9:22:24 AM PDT by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

< sigh >

We need to worry about REAL issues folks and semantics don’t cut it.

A “representative democracy” = a “democratic republic.” The term “representative” however is more understandable, and more regularly used, than “republic” (a word used in the name of many communist and other dictatorships, btw).

I’m very happy that citizenship courses actually teach that we live in a REPRESENTATIVE democracy, and not the more commonly used word for our system, “a democracy,” which of course ignores the fact that we are represented by others, and protected by the rule of law.


19 posted on 04/21/2011 9:28:16 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
We need to worry about REAL issues folks and semantics don’t cut it.

Well said. The problem here lies in the stubborn belief held by some that you can describe ANY form of government in one word. Not even dictatorship is sufficient on its own.

20 posted on 04/21/2011 9:38:06 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Maybe those in charge want to use Democracy versus Republic because of the fact our current two party system is Democrats and Republicans and it is a psyhological push into the Democratic Party.


21 posted on 04/21/2011 11:52:32 AM PDT by pacpam (action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
Sir: I adhere to the U.S. Constitution.

From what federal document of the Founders are you quoting? It appears you never went to school in the USA and never said the Pledge of Allegiance when you were a kid...

``...and to the Republic for which it stands...``

Are you also blind or cannot understand English in the Constitution?

Did you ever read the Constitution??

Article 4, Section 4 Republican Government The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a REPUBLICAN Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.``

22 posted on 04/21/2011 12:25:17 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/659-qa-republic-if-you-can-keep-itq

A Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Unfortunately for us, we didn’t keep it. It’s been morphed, and has changed, and is no longer a republic.


23 posted on 04/21/2011 12:45:00 PM PDT by Ro_Thunder (I sure hope there is a New Morning in America soon. All this hope and change is leaving me depressed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
Sir: The Constitution is the law of the land and it says nowhere in there the word `democracy`. My civics classes always taught me the the United States is a Republic.

I have never heard anyone argue from a non-1789 base, and use non-sourced quotes as a basis for an argument.

Sir, your musket has no musketballs nor powder.

But my musket has the words of the Constitution etched upon its barrel in blood from a bloodied British bayonet on Bunker Hill where my g-g-ggrandfatherr fought and died.

Yours does not.

Ergo, your argument is empty. You have nothing to stand on.

I stand on the Constitution of the United States of America.

What original document are you using?

Surely, it cannot be the U.S. Constitution for which my family so valiantly fought.

24 posted on 04/21/2011 12:56:19 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson